Penelitian ini merupakan studi validasi dua metode recall untuk melihat apakahmetode pengisian kuesioner modifikasi DILQ lebih valid daripada wawancara padasiswa usia 9-11 tahun. Sebanyak 60 siswa kelas IV dan V SDIT Nurul Fikri Depokpada April 2016 diobservasi makan siang sekolah sebagai gold standard, kemudiandirecall pada siang esok hari dengan metode recall secara random. Hasil t-testmenunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan signifikan antara setiap tingkat validitas (Tingkatpenghilangan, Tingkat Intrusi, dan Total Kekeliruan) kedua metode. Namun, setiaptingkat validitas Metode Pengisian Kuesioner Modifikasi DILQ yaitu 20,24%,13,34%, dan 1,99 lebih rendah daripada Metode Wawancara yaitu 26,96%, 21,76%,dan 2,66.Kata Kunci:Modifikasi Day in the Life Questionnaire, Recall, Siswa, Validasi, Wawancara

---

This study is a validation study of two recall methods which aims to determine iscompleting the Modified Day in the Life Questionnaire more valid than interviewin schoolchildren aged 9 to 11 years. Sixty students fourth- to fifth- grade in SDITNurul Fikri Depok was observed eating school lunch as gold standard, then theyreported school lunch recall on next afternoon with randomized recall method.Although t-test result indicated that every validity rate (Omission Rates, IntrusionRates, Total Inaccuracy) did not differ significantly for the two methods, meanevery Validation Rate were lower for completing the Modified Day in the LifeQuestionnaire method (20,24%, 13,34%, and 1,99) than for interview method(29,96%, 21,76%, and 2,66).Keywords:Modified Day in the Life Questionnaire, Recall, Schoolchildren, Validation,Interview.