Program Internsip Dokter Indonesia (PIDI) diimplementasikan sejak tahun 2010sebagai kelanjutan pendidikan profesi setelah diimplemetasikannya kurikulumberbasis keompetensi (KBK) di Indonesia. Dalam pelaksanaannya, sejumlah pro-kontra muncul dari berbagai pihak di antaranya mahasiswa, institusi pendidikan,organisasi profesi, dan masyarakat umum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untukmenganalisis kebijakan PIDI melalui pendekatan retrospektif. Hasil penelitianmenunjukkan tahapan pengagendaan kebijakan dan formulasi yang relatif baiknamun kurang optimal pada saat legitimasi dan implementasi kebijakan. Peranaktor kebijakan terpotret belum terdelegasi dengan payung hukum dan rincianfungsi yang kuat. Oleh karenanya, direkomendasikan untuk dilakukan evaluasikomprehensif terhadap pelaksanaan PIDI yang melibatkan stakeholder kunci.Kata kunci: PIDI, internsip, intern, dokter, kebijakan.

---

As the consequence of Competency-Based Curriculum (KBK) implementation,Indonesia Medical Internship Program (PIDI) has been conducted since 2010 as acontinuation of the medical education. In practice, a number of pros and consemerges from the various parties among students, education institutions,professional organizations , and the general public. This study aimed to analyzethe policy of PIDI through a retrospective approach. The results showed the stageof agenda-setting and policy formulation has been relatively well conducted butnot optimal in the legitimacy and implementation phases. The role of policy actorshave not been clearly delegated with the strong legal protection and details offunctions. Therefore, it is recommended to do a comprehensive evaluation of theimplementation of PIDI involving the key stakeholders.Keywords:PIDI, internship, medical intern, doctor, policy.