Abstrak
Penggunaan layanan Online Food Delivery (OFD) yang kurang terkendali dapat menyebabkan peningkatan asupan makanan dan berpengaruh terhadap kejadian status gizi berlebih/obesitas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perbedaan proporsi status gizi berdasarkan penggunaan layanan OFD pada mahasiswa nonkesehatan UI. Penelitian ini melibatkan 136 responden dengan desain studi cross-sectional dan data diambil melalui pengukuran antropometri, pengisian Google Form, dan wawancara. Analisis data yang dilakukan adalah univariat, bivariat (chi-square), dan multivariat (regresi logistik ganda). Hasil menunjukkan perbedaan proporsi status gizi yang signifikan berdasarkan durasi loyalitas konsumen, uang saku, dan asupan energi. Setelah dikontrol oleh aktivitas fisik dan asupan energi, ditemukan perbedaan proporsi status gizi berdasarkan preferensi makanan dengan hubungan negatif (p-value = 0,039; OR = 0,213; 95% CI = 0,49—0,93). Asupan energi merupakan faktor dominan dalam pengaruh preferensi makanan terhadap status gizi (OR= 9,605). Penelitian lebih lanjut diperlukan untuk mempertimbangkan aspek lain terkait penggunaan OFD dan status gizi. Mahasiswa nonkesehatan UI disarankan memperhatikan pesan gizi seimbang dalam pemilihan makanan saat menggunakan OFD untuk menghindari risiko status gizi berlebih atau obesitas.
The uncontrolled use of Online Food Delivery (OFD) services can lead to increased food intake and the occurrence of excessive nutritional status or obesity. This study aims to examine the differences in the proportion of nutritional status based on the use of OFD services among non-health students at UI. The study involved 136 respondents using a cross-sectional study design, and data were collected through anthropometric measurements, Google Form, and interviews. The data were analyzed using univariate, bivariate (chi-square), and multivariate (multiple logistic regression). The results showed significant differences in the proportion of nutritional status based on the duration of consumer loyalty, allowance, and energy intake. After controlling for physical activity and energy intake, there were differences in the proportion of nutritional status based on food preferences with a negative relationship (p-value = 0.039; OR = 0.213; 95% CI = 0.49—0.93). Energy intake was the dominant factor influencing the relationship between food preferences and nutritional status (OR = 9.605). Further research is needed to consider other aspects of OFD services and nutritional status. Non-health students at UI are advised to pay attention to balanced nutrition when selecting food through OFD to avoid the risk of excessive nutritional status or obesity.