Ditemukan 39998 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
The high stunting rate in Kebumen District makes this region one of the special locations for handling stunting in Indonesia. One of the reasons is because the policies and regulations on stunting interventions have not been maximally used as a common foundation in dealing with this problem. One of them is the policy of utilizing village funds. The purpose of this study was to analyze the implementation of policies and formulation of advocacy for the use of village funds for stunting in Kebumen Regency in 2019. This study was a qualitative study using the RAP (Rapid Assessment Procedure) approach. The subjects of this study were stakeholders at the District, Sub District and Village level governments that were selected using a purposive technique. The results showed that the uptake of village funds in the health sector including stunting was still very small. In five villages the stunting locus reached only 2.7%. Therefore a strategy is needed, through synchronization and policy collaboration from the Office of Community and Village Empowerment (Dispermades) with policies from the Health Office
Indonesia teritory geographically is a disaster-prone area. In the event of a disasterthere will usually be certain infectious diseases that arise and have increasedbeyond normal limits in communities affected by the disaster. In the end it can becategorized as a public health emergency. Community is the first to directly dealwith the threat and disaster. Preparedness in community will determines the sizeof the impact of disasters on communities. Indonesia as a developing country haveurban and rural areas that different from the aspect of development, governmentand geography. The potential difference aspects certainly affect the possibility ofdifferences also in terms of community preparedness in the face of public healthemergencies and disasters. The purpose of this study was to determine aboutcommunity preparedness in urban and rural communities in Indonesia, which inthis study took a sample in Kampung Makasar-East Jakarta and Desa Campaka-Cianjur that were selected based on the consideration that the two regions areequally harmful for any problems public health emergencies both in terms ofdisaster as well as an increase in cases of the disease. This study uses acombination of quantitative methods (descriptive analysis data based on anassessment of the preparedness of community that combines elements of DesaSiaga Aktif and Desa Tangguh Bencana) and qualitative methods (in-depthinterviews, review of documents). The results of this study reveal that there areany differences in preparedness in rural and urban communities. In urban areas,the percentage of community preparedness is 62.3%, while in rural areas is 41.3%.Almost all of 20 indicators meet in existence and also vary between rural andurban areas. Points are still lacking is the implementation and performanceindicators were not as expected as it should be. The cause of the most strikingdifference between the results of the structural differences in rural and urbanareas, accessibility, funding and knowledge society. It is necessary for thesupervise of the stakeholders (in this research are health centers, the governmentin rural and urban)Keywords: community preparedness, public health emergency, rural, urban.
Hasil analisis kuantitaf dari faktor predisposisi (predisposing factors)menunjukkan bahwa umur (p=0.38), pendidikan (p=0.301), pengetahuan (p=0.201),pekerjaan (p=0.68), kondisi ekonomi (p=0.592), sikap (p=0.452) dan faktor sosialbudaya tidak mempunyai hubungan yang bermakna dengan pemanfaatan RTK diManggarai Barat. Faktor ketersediaan sarana dan tenaga kesehatan mempunyaihubungan bermakna (p=0.038) serta ketersediaan sarana transportasi juga bermakna(P=0.04). Faktor ketersediaan kendaraaan dijelaskan oleh faktor jarak dan faktorgeografis. Faktor-faktor penguat (reinforcing factors) seperti keluarga (p=0.201), masyarakat (p=1), tenaga kesehatan (p=0.26) dan pemerintah (p=0.345) tidak bermakna terhadap pemanfaatan RTK di Manggarai Barat tahun 2016.
Bad goegraphic condition and bad access to health facility still remain to bethe big problem in effectivity of maternity care in NTT Province, Indonesia. The badaccess to the facility causes the problems of 3 Lates (Tiga Terlambat) and still highof MMR and IMR. One of the wayouts of the problems is the revoluiton of Motherdan Infant Health care in NTT since 2009 with providing maternity waiting houses(MWH) near facility of health care.The aim of the study is to determine the effectivity of using maternity waitinghouses in district of Manggarai Barat, Province of NTT, in 2016. The use of MWHlink to the factors of: predisposing factors, enabling factors and reinforcing factors.This research uses Mixed Method Research with explanatory design. Totalsurvey samples are 100 respondents using multistage random sampling method andtotal indepth interview samples are 29 respondents. The analisys of data using thesoft ware program of Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) and Nvivo 11Plus.The result of the survey is 19% pregnant women used MWH in ManggaraiBarat in 2016. Indepth Interview shows the fact that the use of MWH have a positiveimpact for many pregnant women from the villages with bad geographic conditionsand the pregnant women with high risk maternity. The quantitative analysis showingthe result that the predisposing factors: age (p=0.38), education (p=0.301),knowledge (p=0.201), work (p=0.68), socio-economic condition (p=0.592), attitude(p=0.452) and socio-cultural factors had no significant relation with the use of MWHin Manggarai Barat in 2016. The factors of heath facility and healt care provider(p=0.038) and the presence of transportation facility (car or vehicles) (p=0.04) havesignificat relation with the use of MWH. The reinforcing factors: family (p=0.201),public figures (p=1), health care provider (p=0.26) and government (p=0.345) had nosignificant relationship with the use of MWH in Manggarai Barat, 2016.
Kata kunci: JKN-KIS, Persalinan di fasilitas kesehatan, Podes, Susenas.
