Ditemukan 35817 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
To deal with COVID-19 cases in Indonesia, the Hospital Disaster Plan (HDP), which has been synonymous with natural disasters, must be implemented with various adjustments related to the interests of hospitals to protect their health workers. HDP already exists in the National Hospital Accreditation Standard (SNARS) which is an instrument in hospital accreditation. But so far, HDP has only been a complementary document for accreditation, without being simulated and socialized so that when this pandemic occurs, many hospitals are stuttering about it. Many health workers have fallen victim to this pandemic. Regardless of being exposed at work or not, health workers are the people most at risk of contracting this Corona virus. This thesis discusses the performance of HDP implementation at H. Hanafie Muara Bungo Hospital which has activated the HDP system since March 2020. To obtain good performance in HDP implementation, it is necessary to have a good financial system, resources and work implementation so that patients and staff feel safe from transmission. virus. The approach that can be used to evaluate the performance of these four aspects is the Balanced Scorecard. This research is a descriptive analytic study with a quantitative and qualitative approach (mixed method). The instruments used for this research are questionnaires and in-depth interview guides. The population is all staff at H. Hanafie Muara Bungo Hospital and the sample is taken by purposive sampling method. A total of 226 samples from the hospital staff for the customer perspective, and 112 samples from the HDP team for the other three perspectives. The results showed that H. Hanafie Hospital had implemented HDP quite well. The level of agreement for the customer perspective is considered quite good, which is 61%. The customer perspective is assessed based on the subvariables of tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy; the internal process perspective is considered to have a fairly good performance, namely 60.4%. From this perspective, it is necessary to improve the communication and coordination of the HDP team on a regular basis; the learning and growth perspective is considered to have a fairly good performance with an agreement level of 70%. This perspective is assessed from three sub-variables, namely worker capability, information system capability and employee motivation. HDP's work system has been equipped with a good information system and committed members, so it is necessary to immediately find a solution for incentives that are not liquid in order to maintain the spirit of team work. and the financial perspective that is considered to have less performance is 51.3%. This perspective looks at the budget and realization of HDP activities at H. Hanafie Hospital. So far there has been no budget and realization for HDP activities. From this research it can be seen that good coordination and cooperation is needed from all parties in order to carry out HDP properly in order to protect all elements in the hospital, both staff, patients and visitors
Hasil didapatkan : Mutu pelayanan kesehatan unit Hemodialisa RSUD.H.Hanafie secara umum sudah baik namun ada beberapa aspek yang perlu ditingkatkan lagi, kriteria fokus pada pelanggan, kriteria pengukuran. analisis, dan manajemen pengetahuan, dan kriteria hasil kinerja organisasi masih dinilai sangat kurang. 2. Dalam unit hemodalisa di RSUD H. Hanafie Muara Bungo, hubungan yang paling kuat terletak pada kriteria pemimpin dengan kriteria fokus pada operasi sedangkan hubungan terendah pada kriteria perencanaan strategis.
Kualitas mutu pelayanan kesehatan di unit Hemodialisa perlu ditingkatkan, terutama fokus pada pelanggan, perencanaan strategis, pengukuran, analisis dan manajemen pengetahuan dan hasil-hasil kinerja organisasi. Komitmen dari seluruh elemen di rumah sakit sangat dibutuhkan. Pelayanan konsumen dengan baik dan benar, tindakan medis yang tepat sesuai dengan standar operasional prosedur, pelayanan prima dan upaya untuk memenuhi kelengkapan sarana prasarana rumah sakit adalah hal penting yang harus dilakukan oleh Unit Hemodialisa RSUD H.Hanafie untuk peningkatan mutu pelayanan rumah sakit
The quality of health services is an important thing in health service organizations that encourage every health service organization to improve the quality of health services. Seeing the increasing number of visits by the Hemodialisa Unit accompanied by several problems related to the role of leaders, access to the less strategic Hemodialysis Unit, and the less optimal use of suggestion boxes for patients, so that performance improvements in all elements need to be done in an effort to improve service quality.
The purpose of this study was to determine the description of the service quality of Hemodialysis units using the criteria for malcolm baldridge. This type of research is descriptive analytic research, which is a series of activities in which the researcher collects performance information and hospital service quality then analyzes it for various conclusions.
The results are obtained: Quality of health services for Hemodialysis Hospital RSUD. H. Hanafie in general is good, but there are several aspects that need to be improved, the criteria for focusing on customers, measurement criteria. analysis, and knowledge management, and the criteria for organizational performance results are still considered very lacking. 2. In the hemodynamic unit at H. Hanafie Muara Bungo Hospital, the strongest relationship lies in the criteria of the leader with the focus criteria on the operation while the lowest relationship is on the strategic planning criteria.
The quality of health services in the Hemodialysis unit needs to be improved, especially the focus on customers, strategic planning, measurement, analysis and management of knowledge and organizational performance results. Commitment from all elements in the hospital is needed. Customer service properly and correctly, appropriate medical actions in accordance with standard operating procedures, excellent service and efforts to fulfill the completeness of hospital infrastructure are important things that must be done by the Hemodialysis Unit of H. Hanafie Hospital to improve the quality of hospital services
Latar Belakang: Waktu tunggu rawat jalan adalah waktu yang diperlukan seorang pasien mulai dari saat mendaftar sampai dengan dipanggil untuk diperiksa oleh dokter spesialis. Merupakan gambaran dari kemampuan fasilitas sarana dan prasarana serta SDM dalam memberikan pelayanan kepada masyarakat. Di RSUD H Hanafie, waktu tunggu masih menjadi kendala dalam pelayanan terhadap pasien poliklinik. Masih cukup sering didapatkan komplain dari pasien baik yang disampaikan langsung maupun lewat kotak saran. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui waktu tunggu pasien rawat jalan, waktu tunggu pendaftaran, waktu tunggu rekam medik, waktu tunggu spesialis serta mengetahui faktor-faktor penyebabnya. Serta mengetahui persepsi dan harapan pasien terhadap pelayanan rawat jalan. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Cross Sectional, dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Teknik sampel Systemic Random Sampling, Instrumen penelitian Formulir Observasi, Pedoman wawancara mendalam dengan informan, pedoman wawancara mendalam (FGD). Data kuantitatif di analisa univariat dan multivariat menggunakan software SPSS versi 26. Hasil: Rata-rata waktu tunggu 109±25 menit, waktu tunggu pendaftaran 51±20 menit, waktu tunggu rekam medik 20± 9 menit dan waktu tunggu spesialis 38±15 menit. Waktu tunggu poli terbaik adalah poli Syaraf dan Poli Paru dengan waktu rata-rata 99 dan 98 menit dan berbeda bermakna dengan P masing-masing 0,012 dan 0,010. Terdapat sejumlah faktor yang menyebabkan waktu tunggu memanjang, baik kendala SDM, sarana dan prasarana serta regulasi. Kata kunci: Waktu tunggu, Rawat jalan, Pendaftaran, Rekam Medik, Pasien ulangan 1 Mahasiswa Program Studi Kajian Administrasi Rumah Sakit FKM, Universitas Indonesia 2Dosen, Program Studi Kajian Administrasi Rumah Sakit FKM, Universitas Indonesia
Background: Outpatient waiting time is the time it takes the patient from registering until being called to be examined by a specialist. This is an overview of the ability of facilities and infrastructure as well as human resources in providing services to the community. At H. Hanafie Hospital, waiting time is still an obstacle in providing services to patients at the polyclinic. Complaints of patients are still quite common, either directly or through the suggestion box. Objectives: This study aims to determine outpatient waiting time, registration waiting time, medical record waiting time, specialist waiting time, and to determine the factors that cause it. As well as knowing the patient's perceptions and expectations of outpatient services. Method: This research uses cross sectional method, with quantitative and qualitative approaches, Systemic Random Sampling, Research Instrument Observation Form, Guidelines for in-depth interviews from informants, and in-depth interview guidelines (FGD). Quantitative data were analyzed univariate and multivariate using SPSS version 26. Result: The average waiting time was 109 ± 25 minutes, registration waiting time was 51 ± 20 minutes, medical record waiting time was 20 ± 9 minutes and specialist waiting time was 38 ± 15 minutes. The best waiting time for the polyclinic was the neurology department and the pulmonology department with a mean time of 99 and 98 minutes and significantly different with P 0.012 and 0.010, respectively. There are a number of factors that lead to prolonged waiting times, including human resource constraints, facilities and infrastructure and regulations. Keywords: Waiting time, Outpatient, Registration, Medical record waiting time, re-treatment patients 1 Student, Hospital Administration Study Program, Faculty of Public Health, University of Indonesia 2 Lecturer, Hospital Administration Study Program, Faculty of Public Health, University of Indonesia
RSUD Kota Bandung sesuai dengan paradigma Good Governance harus menyelenggarakan pelayanan kesehatan yang bertanggung jawab, efektif dan efisien. Ia harus melaksanakan mutu pelayanan prima. Untuk itu diperlukan alat pengukuran kinerja yang komprehensif, akurat dan sensitif, sebagai wujud pertanggung jawabannya kepada masyarakat maupun pemilik. Namun ternyata Pengukuran Kinerja yang ada di RSUD Kota Bandung tidal: dapat menjawab seluruh pertanyaan dari masyarakat dan pemilik, tentang bagaimana posisi RSUD sesungguhnya. Jadi diperlukan cara lain untuk pengukuran kinerja yang lebih komprehensif, akurat dan sensitif. Balanced Scorecard dengan empat perspektif yaitu finansial, pelanggan, proses bisnis internal serta pembelajaran dan pertumbuhan, oleh banyak perusahaan besar dan Iembaga nonprofit dianggap sebagai alat ukur yang komprehensif dan seimhang. Apakah ia dapat menjadi altematif ? Penelitian ini bermaksud menganalisis pengukuran kinerja RSUD Kota Bandung pada tahun 2006 dengan pendekatan Balanced Scorecard. Desain penelitiannya adalah studi deskriptif analisis, pengolahan dengan metode studi kualitatif dan kuantitatif terhadap data sekunder kegiatan tahun 2003-2005 dan data primer dari survei tahun 2006. Hasii penelitian mencakup empat perspektif yaitu : 1) Kinerja finansial : Tingkat Pertumbuhan Pendapatan 110,53 %, Inventory Turn Over 16 kali. 2) Kinerja pelanggan : Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan Rawat 'nap 80,12 %, Rawat Jalan 72,06 %, Pangsa Pasar Rawat Jalan (2003 - 2005) adalah 19,22 %, 18,79 %, dan 23,25 % , Pangsa Pasar Rawat snap (2004-2005) adalah 22,8 % dan 9,14 % Retensi Pelanggan tahun 2003 - 2005 adalah 56,64 % , 57,42 % ,dan 60,87 %, Akuisisi Pelanggan (2003 - 2005) adalah 43,36%, 42,58%, dan 39,13%. 3) Kinerja proses bisnis internal : Tingkat Pertumbuhan Pelayanan yaitu dua parameter bare pada pelayanan Radiologi, Tingkat Efisiensi Pelayanan (2003-2005) adalah 130R 62,34%, 69,97%, dan 75,05%, Avl,OS 2,90 had, 3,02 hari, dan 3,16 hari, TO1 1,8 had, 41,3 hari, dan 41,15 hari, BTO 74,53 kali, 81,92 kali, dan 79,48 kali. 4) Kinerja pembelajaran dan pertumbuhan : Tingkat Kepuasan Kerja/Pegawai 73,87 %, Turn Over Pegawai tahun 2003-2005 adalah 11,54%, 20,83%, dan 18,52%, Tingkat Produktivitas Pegawai 2003-2005 adalah 19,04 juta , 26,08 juta, dan 24,72 juts, Tingkat Absensi Pegawai 2003-2005 adalah 4,17%, 6,23%, dan 5,58%. Seluruh hasil ukur saling terkait dalam hubungan sebab akibat baik sebagai indikator hasil maupun sebagai indikator pendorong. Dengan demikian RSUD Kota Bandung dapat melakukan pengukuran kinerja yang lebih komprehensif, akurat dan sensitif dari sebelumnya dengan pendekatan Balanced Scorecard.
Consistent to Good Governance Paradigm RSUD Kota Bandung must to do health service implementation, that is accountable, efective and efficient. It must to carry out the best quality services. That to need performance measurement tools which comprehensive, accurate, and sensitive one, as accountability existences to public and the owner. Whatever in fact the performance measurement in RSUD Kota Bandung could not to answer all questions from people and the owner to describe the position of the Hospital actually. So, they need another formulas to measure the performance comprehensively, accurately and sensitively. Balanced Scorecard with four perspective that is financial, customer, internal business process, learning and growth, has considerred by a lot of manufactures and non profit institutions as a comprehensive and balance measurement tools. Can that be an alternative ? This reaseach is analizing performance measurement of RSUD Kota Bandung in 2006 with Balanced Scorecard approach. The design of research is descriptive study analize, processing by qualitative and quantitative study method, towards secondary data of activity in period 2003-2005 and primary data from survey in 2006. Results of this research consist four perspective that is : 1) Financial Performance Income Growth Level 10,53 %, Inventory Turn Over 16 kali. 2) Customer Performance : Inpatient Customer Satisfaction Level 80,12 %, and Outpatient 72,06 %, Outpatient Market Share (2003 - 2005) are 19,22 %, 18,79 %, and 23,25 % , Inpatient Market Share (2004-2005) are 22,8 % and 9,14 %, Customer Retention (2003-2005) are 56,64 % , 57,42 % , and 60,87 %, Customer Acquisition (2003 - 2005) are 43,36%, 42,58%, and 39,13%. 3) Internal Business Process Performance : Service Growth Level is two new parameter of Radiolgy Services, Service Efficiency Level (2003-2005) are BOR 62,34%, 69,97%, and 75,05%, AvLOS 2,90 days, 3,02 days, and 3,16 days, TOI 1,8 days, 41,3 days, and 41,15 days, BTO 74,53 times, 81,92 times, and 79,48 times. 4) Learning and Growth Performance : Work/Employee Satisfaction Level 73,87 %, Labour Turn Over (2003-2005) are 11,54%, 20,83%, and 18,52%, Level of Hospital Revenue per employee (2003-2005) are 19,04 million, 26,08 million, and 24,72 million, Employee Absenteeism Level (2003-2005) are 4,17%, 6,23%, and 5,58%. All of measurement results are conected each other in cause and effect relation as laging indicators and driver indicators. Conclusion result RSUD Kota Bandung can do performance measurment that more comprehensive, accurate and sensitive than before with Balanced Scorecard Approach.
Background: Hospitals have a heavy burden during the COVID-19 pandemic, because they have to try to maintain performance and also continue to play an active role in overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of patient visits has decreased, both in outpatient, emergency department, and inpatient care. Of course, this is not an easy thing, especially for private hospitals. The decline in revenue and rising costs cause the hospital's profit to decrease, the risk of reducing employees for efficiency, the risk of patients being unserved, which if it continues and is not immediately anticipated can cause the hospital to be threatened with collapse. This thesis analyzes the differences in the performance of Hermina Grand Wisata Hospital using the balanced scorecard (BSC) approach before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: This study aims to determine the differences in the performance of Hermina Grand Wisata Hospital before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The design of this study was case study using secondary data. The data is taken from the report on the performance of the Hermina Grand Wisata Hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, compared to the report on performance achievements in 2019 as comparison data. The research data collected will be analyzed by conducting a normality test first in both groups (performance before and during the pandemic), then followed by repeated measures Anova test to see whether there are differences in hospital performance before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the Post Hoc test was conducted to see whether there was a difference in each variable. Results: Based on the results of the study, there were significant differences in performance from the customer perspective, namely on the satisfaction variables of outpatients, inpatients, and the emergency department. Based on the perspective of internal business processes, growth and learning, and finance, there are no significant differences. Conclusion: There are differences in performance before and during the COVID-19 pandemic from the customer perspective, namely the percentage of satisfaction indicators for outpatients, inpatients, and emergency rooms. Suggestion: Hospitals make efforts to increase the number of new outpatients, make efficient use of beds, and increase asset utilization to increase income.
Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Tarakan merupakan salah satu RSUD yang mempunyai potensi untuk berkembang dalam menghadapi era globalisasi, lnstalasi Gawat Darurat sebagi pintu masuk pasien yang paling besar di Rumah Sakit Daerah Tarakan. Oleh sebab itu perlu adanya pengukuran kinerja secara komprehensif IGD di RSUD Tarakan Tahun 2008. Untuk mengukur kinerja secara komprehensif dapat menggunakan pendekatan Balanced Scorecard. Mengukur kinerja dengan menggunakan Balanced Scorecard dapat memberikan informasi secara menyeluruh terhadap kinerja program yang dijalankan., baik itu keberhasilan program maupun kendala-kendala yang dihadapi dalam kegiatan. Dimana terdapat empat perspektif Balanced Scorecard yang dikaitkan dengan visi dan misi organisasiyaitu perspektif fmansial, perspektif pelanggan, perspektif proses bisnis internal dan perspektif pembelajaran dan pertumbuhan karyawan, manajemen dan organisasi. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Instalasi Gawat Darurat Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Tarakan pada bulan April sampai Juni 2008. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kasus dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif untuk mengetahui gambaran kinerja IGD RSUD Tarakan berdasarkan empat perspektif dalam Balanced Scorecard yaitu perspektif keuangan, perpektif pelanggan, perspektif proses bisnis internal dan perspektif pembelajaran dan pertumbuhan. Populasi adalah seluruh pasien yang berkunjung ke RSUD Tarakan pada bulan April dan Juni 2008, sampel diambil decara random sampling terhadap pasien yang berkunjung ke IGD RSUD Tarakan dengan menggunakan alat ukur kuesioner. Pendekatan kualitatif dilakukan dengan metode In-depth interview, telaah dokumen dan observasi.In-depth interview dilakukan dengan Kepala IGD, Kepala Perawat IGD, Dokter jaga IGd dan perawat IGD sebagai infonnannya, telaah dokumen terbadap data keuangan IGD sedangkan metode observasi terbadap respon time pelayanan oleh petugas IGD. Dari hasil penelitian diperoleh gambaran bahwa perspektif pernbelajaran dan pertumbuban masih kurang baik karena masih kurangnya komitmen petugas IGD terhadap pelayanan yang dilakukan di IGD di sebabkan kurangnya sosialisasi Standar Pelayanan Minimal di IGD, masih ada ketidak puasan karyawan IGD terhadap reward gaji yang diterima dan ketidak puasan terhadap sistem pengembangan karier di IGD, perspektif proses bisnis internal tentang respon time belum memenuhi standar Depkes, perspektif pelanggan tentang kepuasan pelanggan masih dibawah standar Depkes yaitu < 70 % sedangkan perspektif keuangan tingkat pertumbuhan pendapatan seeara keseluruhan terjadi peningkatan sebesar 9,43 % dari tahun 2006 ke tahun 2007. Untuk itu diharapkan kepada pihak manajer RSUD Tarakan serta Kepala IGD untuk melakukan sosialisasi Standar Pelayanan Minimal (SPM) kepada seluruh tenaga yang bertugas di IGD serta meningkatkan komitmen tenaga di IGD dalam memberikan pelayanan yang bermutu terhadap pasien dengan menjalankan SPM yang telah ditetapkan oleh Depkes Rl, dan menggunakan hasil penelitian yang didapat sebagai dasar untuk melakukan evaluasi kinerja selanjutnya di lnstalasi Gawat Darurat dan menerapkannya ke dalam manajemen rumah sakit demi tercapai Visi dan Misi rumah sakit yang baru.
Tarakan District General Hospital (TDGH) is one of a district general hospital which has a potency to expand and develop in order to deal with the globalization era. It has widely known that the ER is the main entrance of receiving patients at the hospital. Therefore, there is a need for a comprehensive measurement on the perfonnance of the ER at TDGH in 2008, using the Balanced Scoreboani approach. This approach will give the entire intbnnation of the perfonnance of program conducting at the ER, whether its successful or problems found as the program has applied. There are four perspectives that included at the Balanced Scorecard related to the vision and mission of the organization, they are perspective of finance, perspective of client, perspective of internal business process, and perspective of employee, management and organization experience and development. The study is conducted at the ER of TDGH in the period of April to June 2008, using a study case design with a qualitative and quantitative approach, in order to know the description of performance at the ER of Tarakan DGH, based on four perspecti ves of Balanced Scorecard. The population is all patients who visit to the Tarakan DGH in the month of April to June 2008. Sample is taken by a simple random sampling and interviwed with a structured questionnaire. For qualitative approach, an in-depth interview is condocted, as well as a documents exploration and observation toward the ER. The in-depth interview is carried out toward informants, i.e. the Head of the ER, Head of nurse of the ER. doctor in charge of the ER and the nurse of the ER. Finance data is obtained from the documents explonttion, and observation is taken toward service response time by the ER providers. The study found that the perspective on the experience and development is poor, as the commitment of the ER providers in giving the services is still low. This because of the socialization of the Minimum Service Standard at the ER is not so good. Some employee still dissatisfy with the reward they have and also with the development career system at the ER. The perspective of the internal business process on the response time is not fulfilling the MoH criteria of standards. Perspective of client on service satisfuction is still below MoH standard, less than 70%. Of the perspective of finance, the income growth rate in overall is increase 9.43% from the year 2006 to 2007. Therefore, it is expected that the management of the Tarakan DGH and the Head of the ER will carried out the socialization of the Minimum Service Standard (MSS/ SPM) to all health providers of the ER, and increasing the commitment among providers at the ER to address a good services by applying SPM determined by the MoH. !t is also expected that the resuit of the study will be using fur the base of the advance performance eva1uation at the ER and implemented in to the hospital management board, and hoped that the new visions and missions of the hospital are reached.