ABSTRAK Tesis ini membahas karakteristik dan profil dari safety leadership (SL) pada posisi Supervisor, Foreman dan Leadman pada pada projek MHBL di PT. AD yang merupakan tambang batubara. Selain penilaian dilakukan dari sisi supervisor, foreman dan leadman, juga dilakukan penilaian dari sisi operator yang dipimpin langsung oleh ketiga posisi manajemen lini tersebut.Penelitian ini adalah penelitian semi kuantitatif dengan desian deskriptif, dimana objek penelitian terdiri dari 4 posisi: supervisor, foreman, leadman dan operator. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan teori dari Thomas Krause (2005) mengenai safety leadership yang dipengaruhi oleh 4 faktor: Personality, Transformational Leadership Style, Best Practices dan Organizational Culture. Peneliti hanya menggunakan 3 variabel pertama sebagai konsep penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa supervisor, foreman dan leadman menunjukkan hasil yang belum optimal dalam pemenuhan safety leadership di tempat kerja.Sedangkan hasil penilaian operator terhadap safety leadership supervisor, foreman dan leadman di tempat kerja menunjukkan hasil yang baik pada variabel transformational leadership dan best practices, namun pada variabel personality belum memenuhi kriteria safety leadership.

ABSTRACT This research discussed the characteristic and profile of Safety Leadership in job position of Supervisor, Foreman and Leadman in MHBL project at PT. AD which is the second largest coal producer in Indonesia. The evaluation also conducted on operator/ tradesman level which directly supervise within those three levels of frontline management.It?s a semi quantitative research with descriptive design, in which the research objects are four job positions: supervisor, foreman, leadman and operator. The approach being used in this Thesis is Thomas Krause?s theory (2005) of Safety Leadership, which influenced by four factors: Personality, Transformational Leadership Style, Best Practices and Organizational Culture. Researcher took three variables and excludes the organizational culture, as the concept of the research.The result shows that supervisor, foreman and leadman has not fulfil the criteria of safety leadership in their workplace, while the evaluation form operator shown that their supervisor, foreman and leadman already fill the transformational leadership and best practices criteria, although the personality criteria hasn?t fully achieved in safety leadership.

Kinerja sistem manajemen K3 yang unggul juga hielibatkan perhatian pada faktor prang, faktor organisasi dan faktor behaviour Pendekatan integrasi K3 pada system manajemen perusahaan memasukan aspek manajemen SDM dalam penerapannya. Dengan demikian manajemen SDM menjadi bagian dari upaya manajemen K3 di perusahaan dalam rangka mencapai sasaran K3 secara umum. Program HRD dalam kompetensi SDM khususnya safety officer di proyek juga merupakan program pengendalian resiko K3 secara administratif dalam upaya menurunkan dan mencegah terjadinya kecelakaanlinsiden ditempat kerja, balk terhadap K3 maupun lingkungan. Salah satu program pengendalian administratif pada kompetensi SDM adalah evaluasi jobdescription dan atau persyaratan lain yang terkait dengan tugas dan fungsi safety officer diproyek. Jobdescriplion merupakan cetak biru (blue print) dari harapan kinerja pada pemegang jabatan untuk acuan pelaksanaan kerja. Diharapkan tanggungjawab dan kewenangan yang diberikan tertulis dan dimengerti pemegang jabatan untuk melakukan tugas-tugasnya dan menghasilkan output yang diharapkan. Akan tetapi pada prakteknya di lapangan, jobdescription tersebut masih perlu diintreprctasikan ulang dan kebenarannya sangat tergantung pada pemaharnan dan kepentingan pengguna jobdescription tersebut. Unit-unit kerja menterjemahkan kembali dengan jobdescription masing-masing dan tidak standar. Perbedaan intrepretasi dapat membuat ketidakharmonisan sistem kerja yang pada akhirnya dapat membuat gangungan-gangguan dalarn proses manajemen perusahaan. Tesis ini mengevaluasi uraian tugas safety officer korporat (2000) yang masih berlaku di PT XYZ saat penelitian ini dilakukan. Alat evaluasinya adalah kerangka kompetensi kerja yang diharapkan dari petugas K3 di proyek setingkat dengan first-line supervisor. Hal ini dilakukan karena belum ada evaluasi jobdescription dan analisa kompetensi kerja pads safety officer di PT XYZ. Aspek yang dikaji adalah fungsi atau peran penting first-line supervisor K3 dan kompetensi yang dibutuhkan untuk dapat berperan dalam mencegah,menangani dan mengurangi terjadinya keceiakaan/insiden. Kajian ini menghasilkan kerangka kompetensi tugas safety officer berbasis kinerja aktual yang diharapkan. Dibahas jugs aspek-aspek persyaratan jabatan (job spesification) seperti pendidikan, pelatihan untuk safety officer sebagai bentuk input SDM dan pertimbangan dalam menentukan tugas first-line supervisor K3. Kerangka ini yang menjadi acuan untuk melakukan evaluasi jobdescription safety officer.

Integrated Occupational Safety & Health (USH) approach in company's management system includes Human Resource (HR) management aspects in implementation. Good performance of OSH management system also involves great attention to the human factor, organizational factor and behavioral factor. Therefore HR Management has become part of efforts conducted by OSH management in order to achieve OSH objectives. HR Department program which deal with HR Competency, especially for Project Safety Officer , is part of OSH administrative control program to reduce and prevent workplace incident/accident that lead to loss regarding to either OSH related or environmental related issues. One methodology of administrative control program within HR competency is define a clear role and responsibility of a function or a job within work-system. Therefore there is a evaluation program to assess job description of Safety Officer in order to meet required work competency. Job description is a blue-print of expected job performance of the officer in order to do their duties. Management expects that by handing over written authority and responsibility. the officer will understand and running their duties accordingly to achieve desirable output. However in reality, the job description is required to be re-interpreted by the users, that leads to misunderstanding. individualize, non-standard job description. The difference in interpretation can lead to work system disharmony and creates disturbances in management practices. including employee satisfaction. This thesis evaluates Corporate Safety Officer Job description (2000) at PT XYZ, against the work competency framework of a first-line supervisor level OSH officer. This is done due to no job description evaluation and work competency analysis has ever been conducted for safety officer at PT XYZ. Aspect that is being analyzed mainly is the function and main role of first-line OSH supervisor, and competency required to be able to run the role in preventing, handling and reducing incident/accidents. This analysis will result in a performance based competency framework of the safety officer. Also being discussed in the thesis is the job specification aspects, such as education and training for safety officer, as an input and consideration to determining first-line OSH supervisor job. This framework will be a guideline to conduct an evaluation of safety officer job description.