Ditemukan 29265 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Markets are the second largest contributor to waste in Indonesia after households. Most market waste is still managed using traditional methods that are inadequate, namely waste is collected and transported to temporary shelter, then transported by trucks for disposal, without processing. This study aims to assess the economic feasibility of waste management at X Market and Y market by considering the costs and benefits involved. A descriptive quantitative approach based on a case study of economic evaluation using Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) was applied to compare waste management at X Market with waste management at Y Market. The total cost of waste management at X Market amounted to Rp593,412,023, with total benefits is Rp31,707,992. From the total costs and total benefits, a net value of -561,704,031 and a BCR of 0.053 were obtained. The total costs for Y Market amounted to Rp662,910,538, and the total benefits obtained is Rp11,406,250, resulting in a net value of -651,504,288 and a BCR of 0.017 were obtained. This study concludes that waste management at X Market is relatively more feasible than at Y Market, although both are unprofitable and economically unfeasible to implement.
Kata kunci: fishbone diagram, limbah padat, pasar, analisis masalah
Waste Recycle Facility TPS3R is one of the solutions in waste management, but the implementation of TPS3R experiences many obstacles. The community and area developers are not interested in recycling because they incur high costs and are considered unprofitable, so it needs to be convinced that the construction of waste recycling facilities has a beneficial value. The purpose of this study was to determine the economic feasibility of waste recycling facilities (TPS3R) and temporary dumpsite (TPS). This research is a descriptive quantitative case study research in TPS3R Mutiara Bogor Raya and TPS Katulampa as the unit of analysis. The analytical method uses Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA). The results showed the total cost of TPS3R was Rp.549,980,813, the total benefit of TPS3R was Rp.728,616,000, with a net value of TPS3R was Rp.178,635,187 and BCR was 1.32. The total cost of the TPS was Rp. 285.208.500, the total benefit of the TPS was Rp.179,040,000, with a net value of TPS was Rp-106.168.500 and BCR was 0.62. The conclusion of this research is that TPS3R waste management is more profitable and feasible than TPS "managing waste using the dumping collection method".
