Ditemukan 28250 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Djoko Setyono; Pembimbing: I Made Djaja
S-119
Jakarta : FKM UI, 1983
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Ermawaty Rahmah; Pembimbing: Dewi Susanna
T-1837
Depok : FKM UI, 2003
S2 - Tesis Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Inda Marlinda; Pembimbing: Rina Artining Anggorodi
S-3627
Depok : FKM-UI, 2004
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Sabrina Handayani Suciyono Astuti; Pembimbing: Laila Fitria; Penguji: Vetty Yulianty Permanasari, Apri Yulda
Abstrak:
Read More
Pasar adalah kontributor sampah terbesar kedua di Indonesia setelah rumah tangga. Sebagian besar sampah pasar masih dilakukan pengelolaan secara tradisional yang tidak memadai, yaitu sampah yang terkumpul diangkut ke Tempat Penampungan Sementara kemudian sampah dibawa truk pengangkut untuk dibuang, dan belum menerapkan pengolahan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menilai kelayakan ekonomi dari pengelolaan sampah di Pasar X dan Pasar Y dengan pertimbangan nilai biaya dan manfaat. Pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif berdasarkan studi kasus evaluasi ekonomi Cost Benefit Analysis pada pengelolaan sampah Pasar X dibandingkan dengan Pasar Y. Hasil total biaya pengelolaan sampah Pasar X adalah Rp593.412.023 dan total manfaat yang diperoleh sebesar Rp31.707.992. Dari total biaya dan total manfaat tersebut dihasilkan net value senilai -561.704.031 dan BCR 0,053. Total biaya yang dikeluarkan untuk Pasar Y sebesar Rp662.910.538 dan total manfaat yang didapatkan sejumlah Rp11.406.250. Dari total biaya dan total manfaat tersebut, dihasilkan net value senilai -651.504.288 dan BCR 0,017. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa Pengelolaan sampah Pasar X lebih memungkinkan untuk dilakukan dibanding Pasar Y meskipun sama-sama tidak menguntungkan dan tidak layak secara ekonomi untuk dilakukan.
Markets are the second largest contributor to waste in Indonesia after households. Most market waste is still managed using traditional methods that are inadequate, namely waste is collected and transported to temporary shelter, then transported by trucks for disposal, without processing. This study aims to assess the economic feasibility of waste management at X Market and Y market by considering the costs and benefits involved. A descriptive quantitative approach based on a case study of economic evaluation using Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) was applied to compare waste management at X Market with waste management at Y Market. The total cost of waste management at X Market amounted to Rp593,412,023, with total benefits is Rp31,707,992. From the total costs and total benefits, a net value of -561,704,031 and a BCR of 0.053 were obtained. The total costs for Y Market amounted to Rp662,910,538, and the total benefits obtained is Rp11,406,250, resulting in a net value of -651,504,288 and a BCR of 0.017 were obtained. This study concludes that waste management at X Market is relatively more feasible than at Y Market, although both are unprofitable and economically unfeasible to implement.
Markets are the second largest contributor to waste in Indonesia after households. Most market waste is still managed using traditional methods that are inadequate, namely waste is collected and transported to temporary shelter, then transported by trucks for disposal, without processing. This study aims to assess the economic feasibility of waste management at X Market and Y market by considering the costs and benefits involved. A descriptive quantitative approach based on a case study of economic evaluation using Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) was applied to compare waste management at X Market with waste management at Y Market. The total cost of waste management at X Market amounted to Rp593,412,023, with total benefits is Rp31,707,992. From the total costs and total benefits, a net value of -561,704,031 and a BCR of 0.053 were obtained. The total costs for Y Market amounted to Rp662,910,538, and the total benefits obtained is Rp11,406,250, resulting in a net value of -651,504,288 and a BCR of 0.017 were obtained. This study concludes that waste management at X Market is relatively more feasible than at Y Market, although both are unprofitable and economically unfeasible to implement.
S-12030
Depok : FKM UI, 2025
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Rachmat Suherwin; Pembimbing: Agustin Kusumayati, Bambang Wispriyono
T-2018
Depok : FKM UI, 2004
S2 - Tesis Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
A.R. Soemini; Pembimbing: Izhar M. Fihir
T-10
Depok : FKM UI, 1979
S2 - Tesis Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Nisa Larasati; Pembimbing: Laila Fitria; Penguji: Ririn Arminsih, Anak Agung Made
Abstrak:
Perubahan sistem pengelolaan sampah di Universitas Indonesia telah dilaksanakan seperti kegiatan pemilahan sampah tingkat fakultas dan pendirian UPS UI. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan pengelolaan sampah masing-masing fakultas dan efektivitas UPS UI dalam mengolah sampah organik yang dihasilkan oleh fakultas dan unit menjadi pupuk kompos. Penelitian dilakukan pada 14 titik kumpul sampah di Universitas Indonesia dan UPS UI. Peneliti melakukan observasi dan wawancara kepada petugas pemilah sampah, koordinator petugas kebersihan, koordinator/manajer fakultas, dan pekerja di UPS UI. Kegiatan pengelolaan sampah di fakultas terdiri dari pemilahan dan pewadahan sedangkan pengangkutan dan pengolahan sampah organik dilakukan oleh pihak universitas. Jumlah sampah makanan yang diolah menjadi pupuk kompos pada tahun 2017 mencapai 148.652 kg dengan tingkat efektivitas pengolahan mencapai 99.35%. Penggunaan APD pada petugas pemilah sampah berupa sarung tangan sebesar 71%, masker 50%, penutup kepala 64%, dan sepatu boot 79%. Riwayat gangguan kesehatan pada petugas pemilah sampah antara lain pilek dan batuk 67% dan demam sebesar 41%. Hasil pengukuran kualitas sumber air di UPS UI menunjukan jumlah bakteri koliform sebanyak 72 koloni dan Eschericia coli sebanyak 15 koloni. Perbaikan sistem monitoring dan evaluasi perlu dilakukan untuk meningkatkan sistem pengelolaan sampah di tingkat fakultas dan universitas.
Kata kunci: Sistem pengelolaan sampah, efektivitas UPS, alat pelindung diri, riwayat gngguan kesehatan
Waste management system in the campus has been implemented by Solid Waste Handling Facility of Universitas Indonesia (UPS UI). The main purpose of this study, therefore, is twofold that are to describe the current status of waste management in each faculty and to assess the effectiveness of organic solid waste processing in the Solid Waste Handling Facility of the campus. This study is based on the survey in 14 waste rallying points of the campus. In this study we observe and interview sorting waste workers, coordinators of each point, workers and the manager in the Solid Waste Handling Facility. Questions of interview include the waste management system, the use of Personal Protective Equipment (APD) and history of health problems. Activities of waste management in the faculties consist of sorting and packaging. Moreover, activities of organic waste transportation and processing involve the university. The results show that from organic solid waste amount of compos fertilizer is approximately 148.652 kg and the effectiveness of processing is about 99.35% in 2017. Workers in the sorting unit are around 50% using maskers, 71% using gloves, 64% using helmets, and 81% using boots. Furthermore, the history of health problems of workers in the sorting unit shows around 67% of them have suffered from flu and 41% of them have suffered from cough. Finally, the result of water quality in the UPS UI shows that there are 72 colonies of bacteria of coliform and 15 colonies of Escherichia coli. The improvement of monitoring dan evaluation system is needed for enhancement of waste management both in the faculty and university level.
Keywords: Waste management system, effectiveness of solid waste handling facility, personal protective equipment, health problems
Read More
Kata kunci: Sistem pengelolaan sampah, efektivitas UPS, alat pelindung diri, riwayat gngguan kesehatan
Waste management system in the campus has been implemented by Solid Waste Handling Facility of Universitas Indonesia (UPS UI). The main purpose of this study, therefore, is twofold that are to describe the current status of waste management in each faculty and to assess the effectiveness of organic solid waste processing in the Solid Waste Handling Facility of the campus. This study is based on the survey in 14 waste rallying points of the campus. In this study we observe and interview sorting waste workers, coordinators of each point, workers and the manager in the Solid Waste Handling Facility. Questions of interview include the waste management system, the use of Personal Protective Equipment (APD) and history of health problems. Activities of waste management in the faculties consist of sorting and packaging. Moreover, activities of organic waste transportation and processing involve the university. The results show that from organic solid waste amount of compos fertilizer is approximately 148.652 kg and the effectiveness of processing is about 99.35% in 2017. Workers in the sorting unit are around 50% using maskers, 71% using gloves, 64% using helmets, and 81% using boots. Furthermore, the history of health problems of workers in the sorting unit shows around 67% of them have suffered from flu and 41% of them have suffered from cough. Finally, the result of water quality in the UPS UI shows that there are 72 colonies of bacteria of coliform and 15 colonies of Escherichia coli. The improvement of monitoring dan evaluation system is needed for enhancement of waste management both in the faculty and university level.
Keywords: Waste management system, effectiveness of solid waste handling facility, personal protective equipment, health problems
S-9658
Depok : FKM UI, 2018
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Almira Nurul Qisti; Pembimbing: Ema Hermawati; Penguji: Haryoto Kusno Putranto, Ariyanto
Abstrak:
Read More
Dalam rangka pengurangan sampah yang diangkut ke TPA, pentingnya melakukan pengelolaan sampah yang dimulai dari masyarakat yang dapat dilakukan secara sinergis melalui program nasional yaitu bank sampah. Namun hingga saat ini, bank sampah masih belum berfungsi secara maksimal. Pengurangan sampah yang berhasil dilakukan baru mencapai 27,73% dari target sebesar 30% total sampah. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis sistem pengelolaan sampah pada bank sampah dan mengetahui strategi yang tepat untuk bank sampah di Kecamatan Pasar Minggu agar dapat berkelanjutan dan dapat mengurangi sampah yang diangkut ke TPA. Analisis data dilakukan dengan pendekatan analisis SWOT melalui perhitungan bobot dan rating pada indikator kekuatan, kelemahan, peluang, dan ancaman berdasarkan aspek-aspek pengelolaan sampah yang ada pada teori Integrated Sustainable Waste Management (ISWM). Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam kepada 13 petugas bank sampah, observasi secara langsung ke 4 bank sampah, dan telaah dokumen bank sampah di Kecamatan Pasar Minggu. Hasil analisis SWOT diperoleh bahwa nilai internal atau Internal Factors Analysis Summary (IFAS) sebesar 0,732 dan nilai eksternal atau External Factors Analysis Summary (EFAS) sebesar -1,406 menunjukan bahwa bank sampah di Kecamatan Pasar Minggu sudah berada di posisi yang cukup baik, yaitu berada pada kuadran 2 pada posisi antara sumbu kekuatan (strength) dan ancaman (threat). Posisi ini dapat diartikan bahwa bank sampah di Kecamatan Pasar Minggu disarankan untuk melakukan strategi diversifikasi, yaitu dengan menggunakan kekuatan dari segi internal untuk mengatasi ancaman. Kesimpulannya, bank sampah di Kecamatan Pasar Minggu telah berjalan dengan baik. Namun, untuk terus mempertahankan dan meningkatkan kualitas bank sampah, penting dukungan dari semua pihak dimulai dari masyarakat setempat, RT dan RW, pemerintah setempat, hingga lembaga swasta.
To reduce waste transported to the trash yard, it is important to carry out waste management starting from the community which can be carried out synergistically through a national program, waste bank. However, the waste bank is still not functioning optimally. The successful reduction of waste banks has only reached 27.73% of the target of 30% of total waste. This study aims to analyze the waste management system at the waste bank and find out the right strategy for the waste bank in Pasar Minggu District so that it can be sustainable and can reduce the waste transported to the trash yard. Data analysis was carried out using the SWOT analysis approach by calculating weights and ratings on indicators of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats based on aspects of waste management in the Integrated Sustainable Waste Management (ISWM) theory. Data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews with 13 waste bank officers, direct observation of 4 waste banks, and review of waste bank documents in Pasar Minggu District. The results of the SWOT analysis showed that the internal value (IFAS) was 0.732 and the external value (EFAS) was -1.406 indicating that the waste bank in Pasar Minggu District is in a fairly good position, which is in quadrant 2 in the position between the strength and threats. This position can be interpreted that the waste bank in Pasar Minggu District is advised to carry out a diversification strategy, namely by using strength from an internal perspective to overcome threats. In conclusion, the waste bank in Pasar Minggu District is running well. However, to continue to maintain and improve the quality of bank waste, support from all parties is important, starting from the local community, RT and RW, local government, to private institutions.
S-11269
Depok : FKM-UI, 2023
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Mariana Ivoretty Sandra; Pembimbing: Dewi Susana; Penguji: Sri Tjahyani Budi Utami, Rina Fitriani Bahar
S-6412
Depok : FKM-UI, 2011
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Mirza Oktariani Anggina Putri; Pembimbing: Zakianis; Penguji: I Made Djaja, Lusi Nurbaiti Badri
Abstrak:
Di Indonesia upaya pengurangan sampah dilakukan melalui TPS3R dan bank sampah dengan target nasional sebesar 30% pada periode 2017-2025 berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden No.97 Tahun 2017. Akses masyarakat terhadap pelayanan tersebut baru mencakup 79,8% di seluruh Indonesia dengan akses terbanyak dirasakan oleh penduduk kota dibanding desa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui persentase sampah yang terolah di TPS3R dan bank sampah berdasarkan sebarannya di 3 kota, Kota Depok, Kota Bogor, dan Kota Tangerang Selatan Tahun 2018. Jenis penelitian adalah deskriptif yang bersumber dari data pencatatan, kebijakan daerah, dan berita resmi pemerintah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persentase efektivitas pengurangan sampah ke TPA di ketiga kota belum mencapai target yakni masih dibawah 5%. Ketersediaan akses terhadap TPS3R yang paling baik adalah Kota Tangerang Selatan sementara Kota Depok mempunyai ketersediaan akses terhadap bank sampah yang paling baik. Nilai efektivitas pengurangan sampah tertinggi diraih oleh Kota Depok yang mempunyai peraturan daerah terkait 3R. Kota dengan alokasi dana terhadap pengelolaan sampah terbesar adalah Kota Depok, namun Kota Bogor dengan alokasi dana sebesar 2.2% dapat mencapai nilai efektivitas setengah dari nilai efektivitas Kota Depok dan persentase pembinaan dan pemantauan yang paling besar di antara ketiga kota lainnya. Kota Tangerang Selatan dengan cakupan pelayanan TPS3R yang paling baik mempunyai nilai efektivitas terendah meskipun nilai Indeks Pembangunan Manusia adalah tertinggi. Nilai efektivitas yang dicapai ketiga kota belum memenuhi target pengurangan sampah nasional dengan persentase efektivitas diraih TPS3R lebih tinggi dibanding bank sampah.
Kata Kunci: Pengelolaan Sampah Padat, TPS3R, Bank Sampah, Efektivitas, Akses.
In Indonesia, waste reduction efforts are done through TPS3R and waste bank with a national target of 30% in the period 2017-2025 under Presidential Regulation No.97 Year 2017. An effective waste reduction effort can be measured by two indicators, namely primary indicators through the percentage of recycled waste, and other indicators related to legal, monitoring, financial, service coverage, and community participation. This research aims to know the percentage of waste managed in TPS3R and waste bank in 3 cities, Depok City, Bogor City, and South Tangerang City. The type of this research is cross-sectional which sourced from recording data, regional policy, and official government news. The results showed that the percentage effectiveness of waste reduction to landfill in three cities has not reached the target that is still below 5%. The highest effectiveness of waste reduction by TPS3R and waste bank was achieved by Depok City which had 3R related local regulation. The city with largest budgeting allocation for waste management is Depok City, but Bogor City with a budget allocation of 2.2% can achieve the value of half effectiveness of Depok City and the highest percentage of training and monitoring from government among the three cities. South Tangerang City with the best coverage of TPS3R services has the lowest effectiveness value despite its high Human Development Index value. The effectiveness of the three cities still not yet reached a national target of waste reduction efforts with the percentage of effectiveness achieved by TPS3R higher than the waste bank.
Key words: Solid Waste Management, TPS3R, Waste Bank, Effectiveness, Access.
Read More
Kata Kunci: Pengelolaan Sampah Padat, TPS3R, Bank Sampah, Efektivitas, Akses.
In Indonesia, waste reduction efforts are done through TPS3R and waste bank with a national target of 30% in the period 2017-2025 under Presidential Regulation No.97 Year 2017. An effective waste reduction effort can be measured by two indicators, namely primary indicators through the percentage of recycled waste, and other indicators related to legal, monitoring, financial, service coverage, and community participation. This research aims to know the percentage of waste managed in TPS3R and waste bank in 3 cities, Depok City, Bogor City, and South Tangerang City. The type of this research is cross-sectional which sourced from recording data, regional policy, and official government news. The results showed that the percentage effectiveness of waste reduction to landfill in three cities has not reached the target that is still below 5%. The highest effectiveness of waste reduction by TPS3R and waste bank was achieved by Depok City which had 3R related local regulation. The city with largest budgeting allocation for waste management is Depok City, but Bogor City with a budget allocation of 2.2% can achieve the value of half effectiveness of Depok City and the highest percentage of training and monitoring from government among the three cities. South Tangerang City with the best coverage of TPS3R services has the lowest effectiveness value despite its high Human Development Index value. The effectiveness of the three cities still not yet reached a national target of waste reduction efforts with the percentage of effectiveness achieved by TPS3R higher than the waste bank.
Key words: Solid Waste Management, TPS3R, Waste Bank, Effectiveness, Access.
S-9668
Depok : FKM UI, 2018
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉