Abstrak: Penelitian ini membahas tentang analisis risiko K3 pada aktivitas proses wahana PT. X pada bulan Mei-Juni 2018. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian deskriptif dengan AS/NZS 4360:2004 sebagai standar untuk proses penilaian risiko K3. Metode yang digunakan dalam penilaian risiko adalah semi-kuantitatif formula matematika W. T Fine. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tingkat risiko K3 pada aktivitas proses wahana PT. X. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ditemukan 6 risiko terbesar pada tahapan aktivitas kerja dengan level risiko yang belum acceptable, yaitu very high, dan priority 1. Oleh karena itu, diberikan rekomendasi untuk pengendalian dari 6 risiko terbesar tersebut dari masing-masing proses yang bersifat engineering control, dan administrative control.
Kata kunci: AS/NZS 4360:2004, manajemen risiko, penilaian risiko, tingkat risiko.

---

This research discusses about the risk analysis of occupational health and safety in activity of ride process at PT. X in May-June 2018. This research used descriptive research design with AS / NZS 4360:2004 as the standard for the OHS risk assessment process. The method used in risk assessment is a semi-quantitative mathematical formula W. T Fine. The purpose of this study is to determine the level of OHS risk in the ride process activity of PT. X. The results showed that found the 6 biggest risks at the stage of work activity with the level of risk that has not acceptable, that is very high, and priority 1. Therefore, given the recommendation for the control of the six major risks of each process that is engineering control, and administrative control.
Keywords: AS/NZS 4360:2004, risk management, risk assessment, level of risk

Abstrak: Penelitian ini membahas tentang analisis risiko K3 di proses kerja Die Casting Plan 3 PT. X pada bulan Mei-Juni 2016. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian deskriptif dengan AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 sebagai standar untuk proses penilaian risiko K3. Metode yang digunakan dalam penilaian risiko adalah semi-kuantitatif formula matematika W. T Fine. Identifikasi risiko menggunakan metode Job Hazard Analysis (JHA). Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui tingkat risiko K3 pada proses kerja Die Casting. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ditemukan sebanyak 58 risiko pada proses kerja Die Casting dimana pada penilaian risiko awal (basic risk) sebanyak 48,27% risiko dengan level very high, 24,14% risiko dengan level risiko substantial, 18,97% risiko dengan level risiko priority 3, dan 8,62% risiko dengan level risiko priority 1. Kemudian risiko dinilai kembali dengan mempertimbangkan pengendalian yang sudah ada (existing control) menjadi 46,55% risiko dengan level risiko priority 3, 24,13% risiko dengan level risiko substantial, 13,80% risiko dengan level risiko priority 1, 8,62% risiko dengan level risiko very high, dan 6,90% risiko dengan level risiko acceptable. Sedangkan dari keempat proses kerja Die Casting terdapat 5 risiko terbesar dengan level risiko yang belum acceptable, yaitu very high, priority 1 dan substantial. Oleh karena itu, diberikan rekomendasi untuk pengendalian dari 5 risiko terbesar tersebut dari masing-masing proses yang bersifar engineering control, administrative control atau personal protective control.
Kata kunci: AS/NZS ISO 31000 : 2009, manajemen risiko, penilaian risiko, tingkat risiko.

---

This study discusses about the risk analysis of occupational health and safety in the working process Die Casting Plan 3 PT. X in May-June 2016. This study used a descriptive research design with AS / NZS ISO 31000: 2009 as standard for the risk assessment process of occupational health and safety. The method used in the risk assessment is a semi-quantitative mathematical formula W. T Fine. Risk identification method in this study adopted by Job Hazard Analysis (JHA). The purpose of this study was to determine the risk level of occupational health and safety in the working process Die Casting. The results showed that found as many as 58 risks in the working process Die Casting. where the initial risk assessment (basic risk) as much as 48.27% of risk with a very high level, 24.14% of risk with substantial risk level, 18.97% of risk with risk priority level 3, and 8.62% risk risk level priority 1. Then these risks reassessed taking into account the existing controls (existing risk) to 46.55% of risk with risk priority level 3, 24.13% of risk with substantial risk level, 13.80% risk risk priority level 1, 8.62% of risk with a very high level of risk, and 6.90% to the level of risk acceptable risk. While on the fourth working process Die Casting, there are 5 biggest risk to the level of risk that is not acceptable, is very high, priority 1 and substantial. Therefore, given advice on the control of the 5 biggest risks of each process that is engineering controls, administrative controls or personal protective control.
Keyword: AS / NZS ISO 31000: 2009, risk management, risk assessment, risk levels.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini membahas tentang nilai risiko yang didapat pada proses penerimaan dan penimbunan di PT Pertamina (Persero) Terminal BBM Jakarta Group Tahun2012. Penilaian risiko dilakukan dengan menganalisis nilai kemungkinan,pemajanan dan konsekuensi dari setiap tahapan pekerjaan yang kemudian dibandingkan dengan standar level risiko semikuantitatif W.T. Fine J untukmengetahui level risiko yang ada pada setiap kegiatan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif analitik dengan menggunakan metode semi kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa level risiko yang dimiliki pada setiap langkah kegiatan penerimaan dan penimbunan meliputi level : acceptable, priority 3,substancial, priority 1, dan very high. Kata kunci : Penilaian risiko, kemungkinan, pemajanan, konsekuensi dan level risiko.

---

This study discusses the risk values obtained in the process of receiving andstockpiling of PT Pertamina (Persero) Fuel Terminal Jakarta Group in 2012. Riskassessment is done by analyzing the possible value, exposure and consequences ofeach stage of the work which is then compared to the standard level of risksemiquantitatively WT Fine J to determine the level of risk involved in anyactivity. This study is a descriptive analytic study using semi-quantitativemethods. The results stated that the level of risk that you have on every step of theadmission and retention activities include level: acceptable, priority 3, substancial,priority 1, and very high.Keywords:Risk assessment, probability, Exposure, consequences and risk levels