Compassion Fatigue (CF) merupakan kondisi kelelahan emosional dan stres yang direpresentasikan oleh Burnout (BO) dan Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS). Mahasiswa Profesi Ners berpotensi mengalami CF melalui pendidikan praktik klinik intensif pada berbagai setting pelayanan kesehatan. Namun, di Indonesia penelitian mengenai CF pada Mahasiswa Profesi Ners masih sangat terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis distribusi tingkat BO dan STS, serta hubungan antara faktor lingkungan kerja dan tugas atau pekerjaan praktik klinik, faktor klien atau pasien, dan faktor karakteristik individu dengan masing-masing BO dan STS pada Mahasiswa Profesi Ners Universitas Indonesia Tahun 2026. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain kuantitatif dengan pendekatan cross-sectional. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik total sampling pada Mahasiswa Profesi Ners Universitas Indonesia Tahun 2026 yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi, dengan jumlah responden akhir sebanyak 41 orang. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan instrumen baku seperti Professional Quality of Life Scale versi 5 (ProQOL V), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale versi 10 item (CD-RISC-10), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), dan Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa pada distribusi tingkat BO relatif seimbang antara kategori BO yang lebih rendah (51,2%) dan kategori BO yang lebih yang lebih tinggi (48,8%). Selain itu, pada distribusi tingkat STS sebagian besar responden (82,9%) berada pada kategori sedang. Keduanya menunjukan keberadaan BO dan STS sebagai representasi CF pada Mahasiswa Profesi Ners Universitas Indonesia Tahun 2026. Ditemukan juga faktor yang berhubungan signifikan dengan BO, yaitu faktor klien atau pasien berupa frekuensi pengalaman menyaksikan atau merawat klien atau pasien yang sekarat atau meninggal dunia (p = 0,045; OR = 3,792) dan faktor karakteristik individu berupa lama praktik klinik (p = 0,023; OR = 4,643) serta resiliensi psikologis (p = 0,010; OR = 5,833). Sementara itu, tidak ditemukan hubungan yang signifikan secara statistik antara ketiga faktor dengan STS.

Compassion Fatigue (CF) is a condition of emotional exhaustion and stress represented by Burnout (BO) and Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS). Nursing Professional Program Students are potentially at risk of experiencing CF through intensive clinical practice education across various healthcare settings. However, in Indonesia, research on CF among Nursing Professional Program Students remains very limited. This study aims to analyze the distribution levels of BO and STS, as well as the relationships between work environment and clinical practice task or job factors, client or patient factors, and individual characteristic factors with BO and STS, respectively, among Nursing Professional Program students at Universitas Indonesia in 2026. This study employed a quantitative design with a cross-sectional approach. Sampling was conducted using a total sampling technique among Nursing Professional Program students at Universitas Indonesia in 2026 who met the inclusion criteria, resulting in a final sample of 41 respondents. Data were collected using standardized instruments, namely the Professional Quality of Life Scale version 5 (ProQOL V), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 item version (CD-RISC-10), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). The results found that the distribution of BO levels was relatively balanced between the lower BO category (51.2%) and the higher BO category (48.8%). In addition, the distribution of STS levels showed that the majority of respondents (82.9%) fell into the moderate category. Both findings indicate the presence of BO and STS as representations of CF among Nursing Professional Program students at Universitas Indonesia in 2026. The study also found factors significantly associated with BO, namely the client or patient factor in the form of frequency of experience witnessing or caring for dying or deceased clients or patients (p = 0.045; OR = 3.792), and individual characteristic factors in the form of length of clinical practice (p = 0.023; OR = 4.643) and psychological resilience (p = 0.010; OR = 5.833). Meanwhile, no statistically significant relationship was found between the three factors and STS.

Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSB) merupakan minuman berpemanis yang mengandung gula berkalori tambahan dan dapat menyebabkan resistensi insulin, penumpukan lemak, hingga obesitas yang meningkatkan risiko penyakit metabolik. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui perbedaan konsumsi SSB berdasarkan karakteristik individu, faktor lingkungan, dan gaya hidup pada mahasiswa Rumpun Ilmu Kesehatan (RIK) dan non-RIK di Universitas Indonesia tahun 2025. Desain penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif cross-sectional dengan pengumpulan data melalui kuesioner daring pada 191 mahasiswa. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa 50,2% mahasiswa mengonsumsi SSB tinggi (≥6 kali/minggu), dengan proporsi lebih tinggi pada mahasiswa non-RIK (53,1%) dibanding RIK (46,8%). Konsumsi SSB secara signifikan berbeda berdasarkan sikap terhadap konsumsi SSB (p=0,007), tingkat stres (p=0,017), pengaruh iklan (p=0,022), dan kebiasaan merokok (p=0,037). Mahasiswa disarankan untuk membatasi atau tidak sama sekali mengonsumsi SSB untuk mencegah dampak negatif terhadap kesehatan metabolik.

Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSBs) are sweetened drinks containing added caloric sugar, which can lead to insulin resistance, fat accumulation, and obesity, increasing the risk of metabolic diseases. This study aimed to examine differences in SSB consumption based on individual characteristics, environmental factors, and lifestyle among health science (RIK) and non-health science (non-RIK) students at Universitas Indonesia in 2025. A cross-sectional quantitative design was used, with data collected through an online questionnaire completed by 191 students. The results showed that 50.2% of students had high SSB consumption (≥6 times per week), with a higher proportion among non-RIK students (53.1%) compared to RIK students (46.8%). Significant differences in SSB consumption were found based on attitudes toward SSB (p=0,007), stress levels (p=0,017), advertising influence (p=0,022), and smoking habits (p=0,037). It is recommended to limit or completely avoid the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) to reduce the risk of metabolic health issues.