Ditemukan 1 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Sabrina Handayani Suciyono Astuti; Pembimbing: Laila Fitria; Penguji: Vetty Yulianty Permanasari, Apri Yulda
Abstrak:
Read More
Pasar adalah kontributor sampah terbesar kedua di Indonesia setelah rumah tangga. Sebagian besar sampah pasar masih dilakukan pengelolaan secara tradisional yang tidak memadai, yaitu sampah yang terkumpul diangkut ke Tempat Penampungan Sementara kemudian sampah dibawa truk pengangkut untuk dibuang, dan belum menerapkan pengolahan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menilai kelayakan ekonomi dari pengelolaan sampah di Pasar X dan Pasar Y dengan pertimbangan nilai biaya dan manfaat. Pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif berdasarkan studi kasus evaluasi ekonomi Cost Benefit Analysis pada pengelolaan sampah Pasar X dibandingkan dengan Pasar Y. Hasil total biaya pengelolaan sampah Pasar X adalah Rp593.412.023 dan total manfaat yang diperoleh sebesar Rp31.707.992. Dari total biaya dan total manfaat tersebut dihasilkan net value senilai -561.704.031 dan BCR 0,053. Total biaya yang dikeluarkan untuk Pasar Y sebesar Rp662.910.538 dan total manfaat yang didapatkan sejumlah Rp11.406.250. Dari total biaya dan total manfaat tersebut, dihasilkan net value senilai -651.504.288 dan BCR 0,017. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa Pengelolaan sampah Pasar X lebih memungkinkan untuk dilakukan dibanding Pasar Y meskipun sama-sama tidak menguntungkan dan tidak layak secara ekonomi untuk dilakukan.
Markets are the second largest contributor to waste in Indonesia after households. Most market waste is still managed using traditional methods that are inadequate, namely waste is collected and transported to temporary shelter, then transported by trucks for disposal, without processing. This study aims to assess the economic feasibility of waste management at X Market and Y market by considering the costs and benefits involved. A descriptive quantitative approach based on a case study of economic evaluation using Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) was applied to compare waste management at X Market with waste management at Y Market. The total cost of waste management at X Market amounted to Rp593,412,023, with total benefits is Rp31,707,992. From the total costs and total benefits, a net value of -561,704,031 and a BCR of 0.053 were obtained. The total costs for Y Market amounted to Rp662,910,538, and the total benefits obtained is Rp11,406,250, resulting in a net value of -651,504,288 and a BCR of 0.017 were obtained. This study concludes that waste management at X Market is relatively more feasible than at Y Market, although both are unprofitable and economically unfeasible to implement.
Markets are the second largest contributor to waste in Indonesia after households. Most market waste is still managed using traditional methods that are inadequate, namely waste is collected and transported to temporary shelter, then transported by trucks for disposal, without processing. This study aims to assess the economic feasibility of waste management at X Market and Y market by considering the costs and benefits involved. A descriptive quantitative approach based on a case study of economic evaluation using Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) was applied to compare waste management at X Market with waste management at Y Market. The total cost of waste management at X Market amounted to Rp593,412,023, with total benefits is Rp31,707,992. From the total costs and total benefits, a net value of -561,704,031 and a BCR of 0.053 were obtained. The total costs for Y Market amounted to Rp662,910,538, and the total benefits obtained is Rp11,406,250, resulting in a net value of -651,504,288 and a BCR of 0.017 were obtained. This study concludes that waste management at X Market is relatively more feasible than at Y Market, although both are unprofitable and economically unfeasible to implement.
S-12030
Depok : FKM UI, 2025
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
