Abstrak: Penelitian ini menganalisis penerapan sistem keselamatan kebakaran di gedung A dan B PT X pada Tahun 2020 menggunakan Fire Safety Evaluation System (FSES). Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui kondisi sistem keselamatan kebakaran di gedung A dan B PT X. Disain penelitian menggunakan deskriptif dengan pendekatan semi kuantitatif. Gedung A dan B merupakan gedung untuk aktifitas perkantoran. Evaluasi dilakukan terhadap 12 safety parameter menurut NFPA 101A: Alternate Approaches to Life Safety dangan standar NFPA 101: Life Safety Code. Parameter yang di evaluasi adalah konstruksi gedung, pemisahan bahaya, bukaan vertikal, sprinkler, alarm kebakaran, pendeteksi asap, interior finish, pengendalian asap, akses keluar, jalur evakuasi, koridor/ kompartemen dan program tangap darurat. Analisis tambahan juga dilakukan pada sistem proteksi pasif, sistem proteksi aktif dan sarana penyelamat jiwa pada gedung A dan B. Hasil Penelitian menunjukan bahwa penerapan sistem keselamatan kebakaran di gedung A dan B PT X masih memenuhi nilai minimum keselamatan kebakaran gedung perkantoran berdasarkan mandatory requirement pada FSES.

---

This study analysis implementation of fire safety system at A and B buildings PT X in 2020 using Fire Safety Evaluation System (FSES). The purpose of this study was to know the condition of fire safety system at A and B building PT X. The design research was a descriptive with approach to semi quantitative. The building A and B are buildings for office activities. The evaluation was carried out for 12 safety parameters according to NFPA 101A: Alternate Approaches to Life Safety with the NFPA 101: Life Safety Code standard. The parameters evaluated are building construction, hazard separation, vertical openings, sprinklers, fire alarms, smoke detectors,  2 interior finish, smoke control, exit access, evacuation routes, corridors/ compartment and emergency response programs. Additional analysis was also carried out on passive protection system, active protection system, and lifesaving facilities in building A and B. The result showed that the implementation of fire safety at A and B building PT X still met the minimum value of fire safety in the office building based on the mandatory requirements in FSES.