Ditemukan 6 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
One of the mandates of Law Number 40 Year 2004 that the community gets the benefits of health care and protection for Basic Health Needs (KDK), and if the community requires hospitalization then it is served according to standard inpatient room. This is stated in National Health Insurance (JKN) Roadmap 2012-2019, equality of medical and non-medical benefit packages for JKN participants in hospitals in 2019, but so far this has not been realized. The issuance of PP Number 47 Yearf 2021 regulates standard classes that will be implemented on January 1, 2023 and also regulates intensive rooms, isolation rooms and provisions for full-time human resources. The study aims to analyze the readiness of implementation standard inpatient room (KRIS), intensive rooms, isolation rooms and the provision of full-time human resources using a quantitative approach (a questionnaire designed 12 concepts of KRIS JKN criteria in November 2021) and qualitative approch (in-depth interviews using the theory of Donald van Metter and Carl van Horn) at 22 hospitals in the Tangerang district. The results of the study show that the readiness of hospitals at the end of year 2021 to implement KRIS is still less than 60% of hospitals fulfill the criteria for density room (area for bed, minimum distance between beds are 1.5m2, maximum number of bed in KRIS); hospitals fulfilled 23% for intensive care criteria, 36% for isolation room; and 15%-20% full-time specialist doctors in private hospitals and 100% in government hospitals (quantity not quality). Suggestions for this research: the hospital does a mapping of the current availability of inpatient rooms and adjustments are made after the KRIS JKN criteria are set by the government; the government immediately make implementing regulations including firmness on the type of participation and tariffs to be applied so that hospitals can prepare them properly, harmonize regulations, provide tax breaks for medical devices, allocate special funds for government hospitals, massive socialization to hospitals or the wider community, conduct mapping doctors then collaborate with educational institutions that produce specialist doctors; Private hospitals also prepare special funds independently for the preparation of the KRIS JKN; the implementation of KRIS JKN, intensive rooms and isolation rooms is carried out in stages over the next 2- 4 years
Backgorund: The high of outpatient revisit in hospital from INA CBG Claims with grouping code Q-5-44-0 since 2014 can be a burden on health assurance (JKN) financing. Based on INA CBG system, grouping code: Q- 5-44-0 is set for follow up after treatment visit at secondary health facilities. This condition needs indepth analysis to find factor which is related with outpatient revisit rate. Methodology: This study used a cross-sectional study (quantitative methods) to observe relationship between independent variables of JKN participant (gender, age cluster, participant cluster) and hospital (ownership type, hospital referral class, specialist clinic) with outpatient revisit rate (dependent variable). Sample size were 2.947 participant identities as uniqely code which is presented every participant from nine branch offices of BPJS Kesehatan (Indonesia administration bodies of social health security). Results: the average number of 9.96 visits in 2017 was highest in Class B FKRTL (51.5%) and the highest specialist poly destination was internal medicine poly (27.5%). There is no average difference between the number of outpatient revisit for women and men, there is no difference in the average number of outpatient revisit between government and private ownership, and there is no difference in the number of outpatient revisit between age groups. There is an average difference in the number of outpatient revisit between subsidized participan and Non-subsidized participan, there are differences in the number of outpatient revisit between hospital classes, and there is a significant difference in the number of outpatient revisit between specialists clinic. Hospital class and specialist clinic have a positive influence on the number of return visits while the participation segment has a negative influence on the number of return visits. Non-subsidized participan, hospital class B, neurosurgical poly, gastrology poly, geriatric poly, kidney poly, emergency clinic, eye clinic, poly obgyn, and poly rheumatology had negative effect while subsidized participan, hospital class A, C, and with other specialist clinic had a positive effect on the number of outpatient revisit.
Background: The burden of disease and mortality caused by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) has increased with the increasing prevalence of CKD risk factors. The National Health Insurance (JKN) program has increased healthcare access. However, the access in urban population is not the same as in rural. Objectives: To find out the relationship between the patients’ residential area (urban or rural) and the role of the contextual variables at the provincial level on the mortality of hospitalized JKN patients with CKD. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using BPJS Kesehatan 2015-2016 sample data. Multivariate analysis was performed with Generalized Estimating Equations and continued with multilevel analysis. Results: The study showed the proportion of deaths was 19.95%. Respectively, rural residents compared to urban and treated in hospitals at Regional 1, 3 and 5 had higher mortality risk OR 1.37 (95%CI 1.33-1.41), 1.82 (95%CI 1.72-1.92), 5.90 (95%CI 4.28-8.12) with p<0.01. However, rural residents compared to urban and treated in hospitals at Regional 4 had reduced risk of death, OR 0.51 (95%CI 0.45-0.59;p<0.01) and those whom treated in hospitals at regional 2 had OR 1.03 (95%CI 0.96-1.12; p>0.05). The contextual variables of the study caused 8.98% mortality variance at provincial level. Conclusions: Rural residents had higher risk of death than those in urban and there was small variation in mortality between provinces.
Number of patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) in Indonesia is growing.The increased prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus is a contributor tothe increase in patients with CKD (Chronic Kidney Disease). Ever sinceContinuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) was intoduced as a form ofrenal replacement therapy, CAPD still small number of users and Haemodilysis stillconstitute the majority of renal replacement therapy in Indonesia. The aim of thisstudy is to analize the cost effectiveness between HD and CAPD on ESRD patients.Study compared 78 HD patients at PMI Hospital in Bogor and 10 CAPD patientsat Fatmawati Hospital in Jakarta. Patient quality of life interviewed by SF 36questionnaire. Economic burden divided in two measurement. Direct medical costmeasured by INA CBGs packet, direct non medical cost (transportation, food forpatient and family) and indirect medical cost (opportunity cost) will be measure byeconomic burden questionnaire. Haemodialysis total cost per year is Rp133.396.692,- and Rp 81.680.000,- for CAPD. 46,2% Haemodialysis patient hasgood quality of life and 90% for CAPD. Bivariat analysis showed Quality of lifeCAPD patient significant in phisical activities, emotional, pain, energy, sosialfunction and sanity. CAPD is cost effective compare to HD with ICER Rp2.032.889,- for ekstra better emotional role and Rp 1.780.265,- for ekstra betterphisical role and dominant for cost and quality of life at CE PlanKey words: cost effectiveness analysis, Haemodialysis, CAPD
