Ditemukan 5 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Jens W. Levy, Benjamin J. Cowling, James M. Simmerman, Sonja J. Olsen, Vicky J. Fang, Piyarat Suntarattiwong, Richard G. Jarman, Brendan Klick, Tawee Chotipitayasunondh
Abstrak:
The serial interval (SI) of human influenza virus infections is often described by a single distribution. Understanding sources of variation in the SI could provide valuable information for understanding influenza transmission dynamics. Using data from a randomized household study of nonpharmaceutical interventions to prevent influenza transmission in Bangkok, Thailand, over 34 months between 2008 and 2011, we estimated the influence of influenza virus type/subtype and other characteristics of 251 pediatric index cases and their 315 infected household contacts on estimates of household SI. The mean SI for all households was 3.3 days. Relative to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (3.1 days), the SI for influenza B (3.7 days) was 22% longer (95% confidence interval: 4, 43), or about half a day. The SIs for influenza viruses A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) were similar to that for A(H1N1)pdm09. SIs were shortest for older index cases (age 11-14 years) and for younger infected household contacts (age ≤15 years). Greater time spent in proximity to the index child was associated with shorter SIs. Differences in the SI might reflect differences in incubation period, viral shedding, contact, or susceptibility. These findings could improve parameterization of mathematical models to better predict the impact of epidemic or pandemic influenza mitigation strategies.
Read More
AJE Vol.177, No.12
Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2013
Indeks Artikel Jurnal-Majalah Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Syifa Nadya Virgin; Pembimbing: Jaslis Ilyas; Penguji: Agus Rahmanto, Pujiyanto
Abstrak:
Setiap negara berupaya untuk terus meningkatkan kualitas kesehatan penduduknya. Hal tersebut memerlukan suatu kelembagaan untuk menuju Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Setiap proses pelayanan kesehatan tidak dapat dipisahkan dengan suatu sistem pembiayaan Kesehatan. Pelaksanaan fungsi pembiayaan kesehatan yang baik dan efisien akan dapat meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan kesehatan sehingga akan membantu Indonesia untuk mengatasi tantangan yang dihadapi pada sistem pembiayaan kesehatan jaminan kesehatan nasional. Thailand merupakan salah satu negara yang sudah lama mencapai UHC serta men-erapkan sistem pembiayaan kesehatan pada jaminan kesehatan nasional berdasarkan tiga fungsi pembiayaan kesehatan, yaitu fungsi penampungan dana, fungsi pengumpulan dana dan fungsi pembelian. Analisis perbandingan sistem pembiayaan kesehatan jaminan kesehatan nasional Indonesia dan Thailand dilakukan dengan mengkaji aspek peran, persamaan dan perbedaan serta lesson learn pada tiga fungsi pembiayaan kesehatan kedua negara tersebut agar dapat menjadi bahan dalam peningkatan mutu dan evaluasi setiap kebijakan sistem pem-biayaan kesehatan yang telah dijalankan di Indonesia dalam penyelenggaraan pembangunan kesehatan.
Each country strives to continuously improve the health quality of its population. This re-quires an institution to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Every process of health care cannot be separated from a health financing system. The implementation of a good and efficient health financing function will be able to improve the quality of health services so that it will help Indonesia to overcome the challenges faced in the national health insurance health financing system. Thailand is one of the countries that has long achieved UHC and has implemented a health financing system for the national health insurance based on three health financing functions are collecting funds, collecting funds and purchasing. Comparative analysis of the health financing systems of NHI in Indonesia and Thailand was carried out by examining aspects of the roles, similarities and differences as well as lessons learned in the three health financing functions of the two countries so that they can be used as material for quality improvement and evaluation of every health financing system policy that has been implemented in Indonesia in the implemention of health development.
Read More
Each country strives to continuously improve the health quality of its population. This re-quires an institution to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Every process of health care cannot be separated from a health financing system. The implementation of a good and efficient health financing function will be able to improve the quality of health services so that it will help Indonesia to overcome the challenges faced in the national health insurance health financing system. Thailand is one of the countries that has long achieved UHC and has implemented a health financing system for the national health insurance based on three health financing functions are collecting funds, collecting funds and purchasing. Comparative analysis of the health financing systems of NHI in Indonesia and Thailand was carried out by examining aspects of the roles, similarities and differences as well as lessons learned in the three health financing functions of the two countries so that they can be used as material for quality improvement and evaluation of every health financing system policy that has been implemented in Indonesia in the implemention of health development.
S-11105
Depok : FKM-UI, 2022
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Rahmakarina Ekoputri Desabrina; Pembimbing: Adang Bachtiar; Penguji: Pujiyanto, Laksmi Damaryanti
Abstrak:
Read More
Sistem pembiayaan kesehatan memainkan peran kunci dalam kesuksesan jaminan kesehatan nasional, terutama dalam memastikan akses yang merata ke layanan kesehatan. Indonesia, Thailand, Singapura, dan Malaysia memiliki pendekatan yang berbeda dalam mengelola fungsi pembiayaan kesehatan untuk mencapai Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Penelitian ini membandingkan fungsi pembiayaan kesehatan di keempat negara tersebut melalui metode literature review dengan menggunakan data dari artikel jurnal akademik dan laporan resmi dari kementerian kesehatan masing-masing negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia mengelola Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) melalui BPJS Kesehatan dengan dana dari kontribusi peserta dan alokasi pemerintah. Thailand memiliki tiga skema utama: UCS (Universal Coverage Scheme), CSMBS (Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme), dan SSS (Social Security Scheme), yang didanai oleh kombinasi anggaran pemerintah dan kontribusi tripartit. Singapura menggunakan sistem 3M (Medisave, Medishield Life, dan Medifund) yang menggabungkan tabungan wajib dan subsidi pemerintah. Malaysia menerapkan sistem dua pilar, yaitu layanan kesehatan publik yang didanai pajak dan layanan kesehatan swasta yang didanai oleh berbagai sumber termasuk jaminan sosial dan asuransi kesehatan swasta.
The health financing system plays a crucial role in the success of national health insurance programs, particularly in ensuring equitable access to healthcare services. Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore, and Malaysia each employ distinct approaches in managing health financing functions to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC). This study compares the health financing functions in these four countries through a literature review method, using data from academic journal articles and official reports from the respective ministries of health. The findings reveal that Indonesia manages its National Health Insurance (JKN) through BPJS Kesehatan, funded by participant contributions and government allocations. Thailand operates three main schemes: UCS (Universal Coverage Scheme), CSMBS (Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme), and SSS (Social Security Scheme), funded by a mix of government budgets and tripartite contributions. Singapore employs the 3M system (Medisave, Medishield Life, and Medifund), which combines mandatory savings with government subsidies. Malaysia utilizes a dual-pillar system, comprising publicly funded healthcare services supported by taxes and private healthcare services funded by various sources, including social insurance and private health insurance.
S-11588
Depok : FKM-UI, 2024
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Berliana Lailatul Akhsya; Pembimbing: Vetty Yulianty Permanasari; Penguji: Pujiyanto, Laksmi Damaryanti
Abstrak:
Read More
Sistem pembiayaan kesehatan memainkan peran sentral dalam keberhasilan suatu jaminan kesehatan nasional. Indonesia, Thailand, dan Singapura memiliki pendekatan yang berbeda dalam mengelola fungsi pembiayaan kesehatan dalam konteks jaminan kesehatan nasional mereka. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui analisis perbandingan fungsi pembiayaan kesehatan pada jaminan kesehatan nasional di Indonesia, Thailand, dan Singapura. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode literature review yang menggunakan data sekunder dari artikel jurnal akademik (PubMed dan ScienceDirect) dan laporan sistem kesehatan negara termasuk website kementerian kesehatan dan website jaminan kesehatan nasional. Hasil penelitian yang didapatkan adalah terdapat beberapa perbedaan dalam konteks pengumpulan dana, penyatuan dana, dan pembelian pada jaminan kesehatan nasional di ketiga negara tersebut. Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) Kesehatan di Indonesia mengandalkan skema pembiayaan berbasis iuran sosial, sementara Thailand mengandalkan tiga skema asuransi kesehatannya: UCS (Universal Coverage Scheme), CSMBS (Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme), SSS (Social Security Scheme). Di sisi lain, Singapura menggunakan pendekatan 3M (Medisave, Medishield, Medifund) yang melibatkan kontribusi perorangan dan pemerintah.
Health financing system plays a central role in the success of national health insurance. Indonesia, Thailand and Singapore have different approaches in managing the health financing function in the context of their national health insurance. The aim of this research is to determine a comparative analysis of the function of health financing in national health insurance in Indonesia, Thailand and Singapore. This research uses a literature review method that uses secondary data from academic journal articles (PubMed and ScienceDirect) and state health system reports including the ministry of health website and the national health insurance website. The research results obtained are that there are several differences in the context of collecting funds, pooling funds, and purchasing national health insurance in the three countries. The Social Security Administering Body (BPJS) for Health in Indonesia relies on a social contribution-based financing scheme, while Thailand relies on three health insurance schemes: UCS (Universal Coverage Scheme), CSMBS (Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme), SSS (Social Security Scheme). On the other hand, Singapore uses the 3M approach (Medisave, Medishield, Medifund) which involves individual and government contributions.
S-11533
Depok : FKM-UI, 2024
S1 - Skripsi Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
Wipa Reechaipichitkul ... [et al.]
SEATROPH-Vol.44/No.3
Bangkok : SEAMEO, 2013
Indeks Artikel Jurnal-Majalah Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
☉
