Ditemukan 7 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
This study aims to provide an overview of the safety culture application, especially in companies PT XYZ that specialize in overdimension & heavy cargo transportation. The study involved 192 workers at the head office and at PT XYZ branch offices through online & offline surveys measuring safety climate. Statistical analysis using 2-sample t-test to see differences in perceptions of safety elements on each demographic characteristic. The results showed that the safety climate in the dimensions of the organization, work and individual earned a score of 4.25; 3.82 and 3.83. For safety factor, Priority of Safety generally the highest perceived score among the others, while Personal Appreciation of Risk has the lowest score. The results of the measurement of the maturity level of K3 culture, it was found that PT XYZ was at the calculative level (score 3.4) where the management of PT XYZ was still the central of the implementation of K3 in the company. From observation, index value of safety behavior is 79%. For this reason, companies are advised to observe more often to capture the aspirations of workers and facilitate safety training for workers. PT XYZ also to be more consistent in the realization of the HSE budget
The implementation of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) in the company can be measured with how many accidents happened each year and many professionals have developed leading indicators as safety culture to prevent these. The company focused on oil and gas sector has also potential risk to fires, explosions, environmental poollution and other work accidents. This study aims to provide comprehensive overview of safety culture implementation in the workplace, in particular oil and gas refining company and will be utilized as safety behaviour to achieve target set by the company. The research study included 356 workers in both office and field through online survey asking for demographic items and safety climate dimensions. The statistical analysis was performed with independent-samples T test comparing safety climate items. The study resulted the safety climate in the dimensions of the organization, work and individual earned values of 4.23, 3.98 and 4.36, respectively. Based on the safety factor, Personal Priorities and Need for Safety (PPNS) in general having highest score perception among others, while work environment has lowest score. The mean comparison showed there was no significant among safety climates based on work location and education. Meanwhile the variable of management position indicated mean difference including management commitment, communication, supportive environment, involvement, personal priorities and need for safety, and work environment. In addition, Three categories of common finding from Safety Observation (PEKA): equipment and supplies around 61.29%, environmental conditions 25.32%, and Personal Protective Equipment 5.34%. From the measurement results of the Safety Culture Maturity Level at PT XYZ, it can be seen that PT XYZ is at a calculative level with a value of 3.04. In terms of position level: upper management 3.1 and lower management 2.98.
Pemerintah mendorong agar setiap perusahaan melakukan penerapan SMK3 di lingkungan kerja masing-masing. Sesuai dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 50 Tahun 2012. Penerapan K3 sering kali dianggap sebagai cost atau beban biaya bagi perusahaan, bukan investasi untuk mencegah kecelakaan kerja. Menurut data organisasi perburuhan internasional (ILO) sekitar 2,78 juta pekerja meninggal setiap tahun karena kecelakaan kerja dan penyakit akibat kerja. Penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesesuaian Kinerja SMK3 dan tingkat pemahaman budaya keselamatan karyawan di Perusahaan X. Data Penelitian meliputi data primer dengen FGD menggunakan kuisioner safety culture maturity The Hudson Model dalam 6 kelompok Jabatan dan data sekunder (hasil temuan eksternal audit ISO 45001 : 2018 dan SMK3 sesuai PP No. 50 tahun 2012). Metodelogi penelitian menggunakan deskriptif analitik dan mix metode (semi kuantitatif dan kualitatif). Ada 20 variabel metode Hudson diperoleh tingkat kematangan budaya pada angka 3,33 (kategori Kalkulatif). Ini berarti keselamatan dianggap sebagai tanggung jawab Petugas K3 atau unit K3 saja yang berfokus terhadap pemenuhan standar atau peraturan saja yang menjadi minimum requirement. Tingkat pengukuran kinerja SMK3 perusahaan telah berada di level memuaskan menunjukan bahwa hasil SMK3 Perusahaan mengkonfirmasi apa yang dideteksi tingkat kematangan budaya keselamatan Perusahaan baru mulai untuk pemenuhan standar K3 dan kebutuhan peraturan perundang-undang. Perusahaan belum melakukan improvement ke arah generative yang sesungguhnya untuk menuju level proaktif dan generative tidak bisa hanya berfokus pada kebutuhan SMK3 namun banyak hal yang dibutuhkan improvement. Jika Perusahaan ingin menuju tingkat proaktif keselamatan dan nilai tingkat budaya generative maka keselamatan harus menjadi nilai yang diyakini secara bersama di seluruh organsasi dan unit kerja.
The government encourages every company to implement SMK3 in their respective work environments. In accordance with Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation Number 50 of 2012. Implementing K3 is often considered a cost or burden for companies, not an investment to prevent work accidents. According to data from the International Labor Organization (ILO), around 2.78 million workers die every year due to work accidents and occupational diseases. The research aims to analyze the suitability of SMK3 performance and the level of understanding of employee safety culture at Company in accordance with PP No. 50 of 2012). The research methodology uses analytical descriptive and mixed methods (semi quantitative and qualitative). There are 20 variables in the Hudson method, the level of cultural maturity is 3.33 (Calculative category). This means that safety is considered the responsibility of the K3 Officer or K3 unit which focuses on fulfilling standards or regulations which are the minimum requirements. The level of measurement of the company's SMK3 performance has been at a satisfactory level, indicating that the Company's SMK3 results confirm what was detected. The maturity level of the company's safety culture is just starting to fulfill K3 standards and statutory regulatory requirements. The company has not made improvements in a truly generative direction. In order to reach a proactive and generative level, it cannot only focus on SMK3 needs, but there are many things that need improvement. If the Company wants to move towards a proactive level of safety and a generative cultural value level, then safety must become a value that is shared across the organization and work units. Key words: Conformity, Safety Performance, Safety Culture Maturity Level
The chemical manufacturing industry is one of the industrial sectors with high hazard potential and complex work processes, requiring the implementation of a strong occupational safety system. One critical aspect that must be explored in depth is the level of safety culture maturity within a company. This study aims to analyze the maturity level of safety culture at PT. XYZ and identify the differences in perception and engagement among employees. The assessment was conducted using a questionnaire instrument consisting of various safety culture dimensions and elements, supported by data from interviews, focus group discussions, and document reviews. Based on the analysis results, the overall safety culture maturity level at PT. XYZ was found to be at level 3 or Calculative. This indicates that while the company has a structured and well-documented safety management system, safety values have not yet been fully internalized into daily work behaviors. In addition, the study found significant differences in perceptions across job levels and departments, where workers in operational roles had limited involvement in safety evaluation and organizational learning. Areas that require improvement include safety communication effectiveness, employee participation in incident analysis, and consistency in follow-up actions from findings and risk evaluations.