Ditemukan 8 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Program KB di Indonesia belum sepenuhnya sesuai dengan target yang diharapkan. Jumlah Wanita Usia Subur (WUS) yang aktif menggunakan alat kontrasepsi di wilayah kerja UPTD Puskesmas Ciater Kota Tangerang Selatan berkisar 52,5%. Angka ini tentu saja masih berada di bawah target nasional sebesar 61,78%. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor – faktor yang berhubungan dengan penggunaan alat kontrasepsi pada WUS di wilayah kerja UPTD Puskesmas Ciater tahun 2025. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan desain cross-sectional, pada 115 responden yang dipilih secara consecutive sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui pengisian kuesioner secara mandiri. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel pekerjaan (p <0,001), pendapatan (p <0,001), pengetahuan (p <0,001), sumber informasi (p = 0,030, akses fasilitas kesehatan (p <0,001), dukungan keluarga (p <0,001), dan dukungan petugas kesehatan (p = 0,001) memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan perilaku penggunaan alat kontrasepsi pada WUS. Atas dasar tersebut perlu pemberian edukasi mengenai kontrasepsi melalui berbagai metode seperti edukasi langsung, layanan konseling personal, serta pendekatan berbasis keluarga terutama suami dan komunitas dengan melibatkan kader Puskesmas Ciater pada WUS di Wilayah Kerja UPTD Puskesmas Ciater.
Kata kunci: Wanita Usia Subur, Kontrasepsi, Keluarga Berencana
The Family Planning program in Indonesia has not yet fully met its expected targets. The percentage of Women of Reproductive Age (WRA) actively using contraceptives in the working area of UPTD Ciater Public Health Center, South Tangerang City, is approximately 52.5%. This figure remains below the national target of 61.78%. This study aims to identify the factors associated with contraceptive use among WRA in the UPTD Ciater Public Health Center working area in 2025. This research employed a cross-sectional design involving 115 respondents selected through consecutive sampling. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires. The results showed that employment status (p < 0.001), income (p < 0.001), knowledge (p < 0.001), sources of information (p = 0.030), access to health facilities (p < 0.001), family support (p < 0.001), and support from health workers (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with contraceptive use behavior among WRA. Based on these findings, it is necessary to provide contraceptive education through various methods, such as direct education, personal counseling services, and family-based approaches—particularly involving husbands and the community—by engaging Ciater Health Center cadres within the WRA population in the UPTD Ciater Public Health Center working area. Keywords: Women of Reproductive Age, Contraception, Family Planning
Coverage of modern contraceptive use in Indonesia increased from year to year.However, the scope of the use of long acting contraceptive system (LACS) is still farfrom the expected target. Based on previous study found that high-risk groups arelikely to use modern contraception. This study aimed to analyze the effect of high-riskbirths with the use of modern contraceptives, especially long acting contraceptivesystem (LACS) and determine other factors that have a value of interventions towardshigh-risk births variable relationship with the use of modern contraceptives. This studyused cross sectional design with IDHS 2007 and 2012. The sample in this study werewomen of reproductive age (15-49 years) who had delivered a maximum of 5 yearsprior to the survey. The results showed that the prevalence of high risk of 30.45%,10.96% double high risk and 19,49 single high risk. The prevalence of moderncontraceptive use by 68% and the most widely used injection method. While theprevalence of the use of LACS was 8.73% and the most widely used method of IUD.A history of high-risk births do not increase the probability of modern contraceptiveuse overall [PR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.817 - 0.861]. There are considerable opportunities touse the LACS for those who have a history of high-risk multiple births either in thewhole population [PR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.65 - 2.13] and in a population of moderncontraceptive users [PR: 1,46; 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.64]. Population using moderncontraceptives, the biggest opportunity to use the LACS when high-risk mothers doANC at clinic midwife and deliver at the maternity hospital (RB) level health centers.Therefore, it is advisable to increase the education, promotion and counselingespecially to women of reproductive age who already have a history of delivering witha high risk in order to prevent the risk births.Keywords: Women of Reproductive Age, High-risk births, modern contraceptive,LACS, IDHS 2007 and 2012
Coverage of modern contraceptive use in Indonesia increased from year to year.However, the scope of the use of long acting contraceptive system (LACS) is still farfrom the expected target. Based on previous study found that high-risk groups arelikely to use modern contraception. This study aimed to analyze the effect of high-riskbirths with the use of modern contraceptives, especially long acting contraceptivesystem (LACS) and determine other factors that have a value of interventions towardshigh-risk births variable relationship with the use of modern contraceptives. This studyused cross sectional design with IDHS 2007 and 2012. The sample in this study werewomen of reproductive age (15-49 years) who had delivered a maximum of 5 yearsprior to the survey. The results showed that the prevalence of high risk of 30.45%,10.96% double high risk and 19,49 single high risk. The prevalence of moderncontraceptive use by 68% and the most widely used injection method. While theprevalence of the use of LACS was 8.73% and the most widely used method of IUD.A history of high-risk births do not increase the probability of modern contraceptiveuse overall [PR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.817 - 0.861]. There are considerable opportunities touse the LACS for those who have a history of high-risk multiple births either in thewhole population [PR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.65 - 2.13] and in a population of moderncontraceptive users [PR: 1,46; 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.64]. Population using moderncontraceptives, the biggest opportunity to use the LACS when high-risk mothers doANC at clinic midwife and deliver at the maternity hospital (RB) level health centers.Therefore, it is advisable to increase the education, promotion and counselingespecially to women of reproductive age who already have a history of delivering witha high risk in order to prevent the risk births.Keywords: Women of Reproductive Age, High-risk births, modern contraceptive,LACS, IDHS 2007 and 2012
Background: MKJP is one of the main performance indicators in the BKKBN strategic plan in increasing family participation in family planning and reproductive health, however, the results are still low. Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the determinants of the use of MKJP in Women of the Age Who Do Not Want More Children on the Island of Borneo. Method: This type of research is a quantitative study with a cross-sectional research design, using secondary data from the 2017 Indonesian Health Demographic Survey (IDHS). The study sample consisted of 1034 respondents. Data analysis used logistic regression statistical test. Results: The results of the analysis showed that the percentage of the use of MKJP for WUS who did not want any more children on the island of Kalimantan was 12.9%. The results of the bivariate test showed that there was a relationship between PT education (p=0.01, OR=3.04), upper economic status (p=0.024, OR = 1.9), and sources of family planning services (p=<0.001, OR = 3.88) with the use of MKJP. While there is no relationship between age, occupation, place of residence, knowledge, parity, husband's support, support from health workers, family planning decision-making and information exposure with the use of MKJP in WUS who do not want more children. The results of the multivariate analysis showed that the dominant variable related to the use of MKJP was the source of family planning services. WUS with previous sources of family planning services in the government sector had a 6.07 times chance of using MKJP compared to WUS with family planning service sources in the private/other sectors after controlling for the variables of education, economic status, sources of family planning services and exposure to family planning information (pv=
