Hasil Pencarian :: Kembali

Ditemukan 3 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query ::  Simpan CSV
cover
Pontisomaya Parami; Pembimbing: Sandi Iljanto; Penguji: Mardiati Nadjib, Budi Hartono, Kurnia Sari, Ni Wayan Milawati
Abstrak: Teknik anesthesia regional blok subarachnoid (RA BSA) adalah yang palingbanyak dilakukan setelah teknik anesthesia umum inhalasi pipa endotrakea (GAPET) di RSUP Sanglah. Teknik anesthesia regional blok subarachnoid dapatmenggantikan teknik anesthesia umum pipa endotrakea pada pasien minilaparatomi (appendisectomy dan laparatomi kehamilan ektopik). Belum pernahdilakukan studi tentang cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) pada teknik anesthesiaregional blok subarachnoid di RSUP Sanglah. Cost diambil dari catatan medispenggunaan obat di ruang operasi dan ruang pemulihan. Outcome (efektifitas)dilihat dari kejadian efek samping pasca operasi (nyeri akut pasca operasi, mualmuntah pasca operasi / PONV dan menggigil (shivering) . Hasil penelitianmenunjukkan bahwa teknik anesthesia regional blok subarachnoid lebih costeffective daripada teknik anesthesia umum pipa endotrakea pada pasien minilaparatomi (appendisectomi dan laparatomi kehamilan ektopik) di RSUP SanglahBali.
Regional anesthesia blok subarachnoid is the most common anesthesia techniqueafter general anesthesia endotracheal tube at RSUP Sanglah. Regional anesthesiablok subarachnoid can replaced the general anesthesia endotracheal tube forminilaparatomy (appendisectomy & laparotomy ectopic pregnancy) patient. Noneof report on cost effectiveness analysis for regional anesthesia blok subarachnoidat RSUP Sanglah. Cost were calculated from anesthesia record paper at theoperating room and recovery room. Outcome were taken from side effect afteroperation (acute pain, post operative nausea vomiting and shivering). The result,anesthesia regional blok subarachnoid were more cost effective than generalanesthesia endotracheal tube for mini laparotomy (appendisectomy andlaparotomy ectopic pregnancy) at RSUP Sanglah Bali.
Read More
B-1644
Depok : FKM UI, 2014
S2 - Tesis   Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
cover
I gusti Agung Ayu Kusuma Arini; Pembimbing: Sandi Iljanto; Penguji: Purnawan Junadi, Mieke Savitri, Budi Hartono, Ni Wayan Milawati
B-1606
Depok : FKM-UI, 2014
S2 - Tesis   Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
cover
Gusti Ayu Putu Nilawati; Pembimbing: Amal C. Sjaaf; Penguji: Dumilah Ayuningtyas, Yuli Prapancha Satar, Ni wayan Milawati
Abstrak:
Review rekam medis merupakan suatu proses yang penting dalam rangka peningkatan mutu layanan Rumah Sakit sesuai akreditasi Internasional. Review rekam medis yang dilakukan belum mencapai 100%. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dengan wawancara dan penelusuran dokumen. Analisa data dengan content analysis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan standar pelaksanaan review rekam medis sudah dibuat sesuai rekomendasi tim akreditasi Internasional. Sosialisasi standar belum optimal, pemahaman tentang review rekam medis oleh dokter dan petugas gizi masih kurang, keterlibatan sumber daya manusia belum sesuai, belum adanya format laporan dan jadwal pelaporan dari instalasi rekam medis ke direksi dan belum berjalannya sistem evaluasi tindak lanjut sesuai PDCA (Plan Do Check Action). Kesimpulan: review rekam medis belum berjalan sesuai standar yang dibuat. Saran: pelaksanaan review rekam medis dimasukkan sebagai salah satu tugas pokok pejabat yang berwenang, supervisi dilakukan secara berkesinambungan, tingkatkan sosialisasi standar review rekam medis, review rekam dapat dilakukan secara rutin untuk semua rumah sakit sebagai siklus perbaikan kualitas rekam medis.

Review of medical records is an important process in order to improve the quality of service correspond Hospital International accreditation. Review of medical records that do not reach 100%. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. Data collection with interviews and document searches. Data analysis with content analysis. The results showed a standard implementation review of medical records has been made according to the International accreditation team's recommendations. Socialization of standards is not optimal, an understanding of the medical record review by physicians and nutrition workers are still lacking, the involvement of human resources is not appropriate, the lack of reporting formats and reporting schedules of the medical record installation to the directors and the evaluation system of follow-up not accordance to PDCA (Plan Do Check Action). Conclusion: a review of medical records have not been going according to the standards set. Suggestion: the implementation of medical record review included as one of the main tasks the competent authority, supervision is done on an ongoing basis, increase socialization standard medical record review, and medical record review can be performed routinely for all hospitals as medical record quality improvement cycle.
Read More
B-1626
Depok : FKM UI, 2014
S2 - Tesis   Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
:: Pengguna : Pusat Informasi Kesehatan Masyarakat
Library Automation and Digital Archive