Ditemukan 30444 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
International Atomic Energy Agency memperkenalkan konsep budaya keselamatan sebagai respon atas kecelakaan di Chernobyl pada tahun 1986. Konsep ini telah menarik banyak perhatian para ahli dan praktisi untuk mengembangkan konsep yang serupa. Begitu banyak definisi-definisi tentang budaya keselamatan dengan pendekatan yang berbeda-beda. Perkembangan dan ilmu perilaku, sosial, budaya dan manajemen juga tidak dapat dipisahkan dari perkembangan konsep tersebut. Meski demikian, konsep dan model IAEA ini tidak berubah sejak pertama kali diperkenalkan pertama kali walau telah bauyak dokumentasi yang dikembangkan untuk mendukung atau sebagai tambahan dari model awal. Tesis ini mencoba untuk melakukan pengkajian atas konsep budaya keselamatan IAEA dan membuat model yang baru berdasarkan dokumentasi IAEA dan sumber-sumber yang lain. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif dan teknik kajian isi terhadap sejumlah dokumen utama IAEA dan beberapa dokurnen tambahan Iainnya. Dari pengkajian tersebut dihasilkan lcritik dan usulan pengembangan konstruk model budaya keselamatan.
International Atomic Energy Agency introduced the concept of safety culture as a respond to Chernobyl disaster in 1986. This concept has raised attention of many experts and practices to develop the concept. Hence,there are many deiinitions of safety culture with different approaches. The development of behavioral, social, culture and management scientific also intluenced the concept. Even tough, the model and concept of IAEA has not been changed since it was introduced at the iirst time. However, much documentation have been produced as supplement to previous model. This research focuses to review the concept of IAEA?s safety culture and create new model based on IAEA docurnentations. By qualitative method, the author tried to interpret the meaning of text and documentation source by content analyses technique.
The implementation of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) in the company can be measured with how many accidents happened each year and many professionals have developed leading indicators as safety culture to prevent these. The company focused on oil and gas sector has also potential risk to fires, explosions, environmental poollution and other work accidents. This study aims to provide comprehensive overview of safety culture implementation in the workplace, in particular oil and gas refining company and will be utilized as safety behaviour to achieve target set by the company. The research study included 356 workers in both office and field through online survey asking for demographic items and safety climate dimensions. The statistical analysis was performed with independent-samples T test comparing safety climate items. The study resulted the safety climate in the dimensions of the organization, work and individual earned values of 4.23, 3.98 and 4.36, respectively. Based on the safety factor, Personal Priorities and Need for Safety (PPNS) in general having highest score perception among others, while work environment has lowest score. The mean comparison showed there was no significant among safety climates based on work location and education. Meanwhile the variable of management position indicated mean difference including management commitment, communication, supportive environment, involvement, personal priorities and need for safety, and work environment. In addition, Three categories of common finding from Safety Observation (PEKA): equipment and supplies around 61.29%, environmental conditions 25.32%, and Personal Protective Equipment 5.34%. From the measurement results of the Safety Culture Maturity Level at PT XYZ, it can be seen that PT XYZ is at a calculative level with a value of 3.04. In terms of position level: upper management 3.1 and lower management 2.98.
