Ditemukan 34749 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Kata kunci : AS/NZS 4360:2004, penilaian risiko, kemungkinan, pemajanan,konsekuensi, level risiko.
This risk assesment of safety research that was held at Pig Receiver Station at PT. Xin 2013, is a descriptif analytic study. This design used a study design basedonstandard AS/NZS 4360:2004 with semi-quantitative method using the Joh HazardAnalysis (JHA). Risk analyzes wereconducted to analyze the velue of theconsequences, opportunities and frequency and analyzed using the methods of Fineexisting AS/NZS 4360:2004. The result showed that level of risk is substantial andpriority 3. Therefore, given the recommendation that is engineering andadministrative.
Keywords : AS/NZS 4360:2004, risk assessment, probability, exposure,consequences, level of risk.
Machines and work equipments that have no protection (guarding), lack of maintenance, working without concerned about safety, and workers who frequently having occupational injury indicate that in Indah Jati Furniture has safety risk of mechanical hazards arising the use of machinery and work equipment. The purpose of the study is to assess the safety risk of mechanical hazards.
This study discusses the risk values obtained in the process of receiving andstockpiling of PT Pertamina (Persero) Fuel Terminal Jakarta Group in 2012. Riskassessment is done by analyzing the possible value, exposure and consequences ofeach stage of the work which is then compared to the standard level of risksemiquantitatively WT Fine J to determine the level of risk involved in anyactivity. This study is a descriptive analytic study using semi-quantitativemethods. The results stated that the level of risk that you have on every step of theadmission and retention activities include level: acceptable, priority 3, substancial,priority 1, and very high.Keywords:Risk assessment, probability, Exposure, consequences and risk levels
Kecelakaan atau kerugian yang muncul pada industri eksplorasi dan produksi minyak dan gas bumi di lepas pantai sangat besar, mulai dari dampak pada pekerja (orang) yaitu meninggal dan cidera, kehancuran/kerusakan fasilitas (peralatan/property), pencemaran air laut (lingkungan/environment) dan citra/reputasi negatif perusahaan.
Heinrich (1931) mengatakan bahwa kecelakaan/kerugian disebabkan 88 persen tindakan tidak aman/unsafe act, 10 persen disebabkan kondisi tidak aman/unsafe condition dan 2 persen disebabkan yang lain. Peneliti melakukan penelitian tentang penilaian risiko pada pekerjaan operator produksi pada pengoperasian FPSO.
Kolluru (1996) mengatakan bahwa risiko adalah kombinasi antara tingkat konsekuensi (consequence)yang terjadi dengan tingkat kemungkinan (probability) kecelakaan/kerugian terjadi. Menurut proses manajemen risiko (mengacu pada ISO 17776 dan AS/NZ 4360), proses manajemen risiko diawali dengan menentukan kontek risiko ,Perusahaan bertujuan mendapatkan keuntungan bisnis dengan melakukan manajemen risiko dengan mencegah atau mengurangi perkiraan kerugian atau kecelakaan yang sangat besar (dampak pada korban jiwa atau cidera pekerja/people, kerusakan fasilitas/peralatan/property, kerusakan atau pencemaran lingkungan (laut) dan reputasi atau citra negatif perusahaan) pada pengoperasian FPSO.
Langkah awal adalah mengenali atau kegiatan identifikasi bahaya di FPSO, FPSO mempunyai potensi bahaya dari fasilitas/proses/peralatan/property, bahaya dari tindakan atau pekerjaan pekerja/orang dan lingkungan/kondisi cuaca. Identifikasi Bahaya di penelitian ini berfokus pada pekerjaan operator produksi menggunakan analisa bahaya pekerjaan/JHA, kemudian hasil identifikasi bahaya ini dihitung risikonya dengan menggunakan metode analisa risiko semikuantitatif atau tabel matrik risiko semikuantitif. Peneliti merekomendasi langkah-langkah pengendalian atau pengurangan risiko dari rekayasa engineering, administratif dan penggunaan Alat Pelindung Diri.
Accident or loss impact which occurrence on industrial exploration and production of oil and gas in offshore is very large, ranging from the impact on workers (people) are dead and injured, destruction / damage to facilities (equipment / property,explosion and fire), seawater pollution (environment) and image / reputation of the company negatively.
Heinrich (1931) said that the accident / harm caused 88 percent of unsafe acts , 10 percent due to unsafe conditions / unsafe condition and the other 2 percent is due. Researchers conducted the study on risk assessment to operation production task on the operation of the FPSO.
Kolluru (1996) said that the risk is a combination of the level of consequence (consequence) which occurs with the probability (probability) accidents / losses occurred. According to the risk management process (refer to ISO 17 776 and AS / NZ 4360), the risk management process begins with determining the context of risk, the Company aims to gain a business advantage by conducting risk management to prevent or reduce the estimated loss or a huge crash (impact on fatalities or injury of workers / people, damage to facilities / equipment / property, damage or pollution of the environment (marine) or a negative image and reputation of the company) on the operation of the FPSO.
The initial step is to recognize or hazard identification activity in FPSO, FPSO has the potential dangers of facility / process / equipment / property, the dangers of the job action or labor / people and the environment / weather conditions. Hazard identification in this study focuses on the production operator jobs using job hazard analysis / JHA, then the results of the hazard identification risk is calculated using a semiquantitative risk analysis or risk matrix table semiquantitative. The researcher recommends control measures or risk reduction of engineering , administrative, and use of Personal Protective Equipment.
Kata Kunc i: AS/NZS 4360:2004, penilaian risiko, konstruksi, pekerjaan di ketinggian
This study discusses the safety risk assessment in construction work atheight in Project Bogor Valley Residence & Hotel PT. X 2014. Risk assessment isfocused to the risk that will be experienced by workers on the job, especially atthe height of finishing, namely: painting by using the gondola, the installation ofrailing at the edge of the building up to a height of 20 floors, billboards usingscaffholding, and Passenger hoist.Risk assessment is done by analyzing the probable value, exposure andconsequences of each phase of the work which is then compared to the standardsemi-quantitative risk level W.T Fine. J to determine the level of risk involved ineach stage of the production process. The study was a descriptive analytic studyusing semi-quantitative method AS/NZS 4360:2004. Design research is anobservational cross-sectional approach. The collection of data obtained fromobservations and interviews. The study states that the level of risk in work atheight includes very high level, priority 1 level, substantial level, priority 3 levelandacceptable level.Keywords:AS/NZS 4360:2004, risk assessment, construction, work at height.
