Ditemukan 8 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
The focus of this research is to analyze all occupational accidents of lifting activities on land rig operations in PT ‘X’ using the Human Factor Analysis and Classifications System (HFACS) method in 2014 - 2018. The type of research methodology is qualitative research with a descriptive design. The final result shows that the unsafe act layer is the most ineffective layer that contributing to almost all occupational accident cases which is 45 of 49 total cases of occupational accidents. Error is the sub-layer of unsafe act which has the highest number of contributions to occupational accident cases with total 39 cases. On the other side, the organizational influences layer is the second layer that has high contribution to accident which is 26 of 49 total cases of occupational accidents. The organizational process is the sub-layer of organizational influences which contributing to 23 cases of occupational accident. The third layer which has contribution to accident is unsafe supervision. The unsafe supervision has contribution to accident which is 16 of 49 total cases of occupational accidents. Inadequate supervision and planned inappropriate operation are the sub-layer of inadequate supervision which contribute to the accident cases for 10 cases equally. The layer of preconditions for unsafe actions is the effective layer which has contribution to occupational accident cases which is 8 of 49 total cases of occupational accidents. Personnel factor is the sub-layer of preconditions for unsafe actions which contribute to 7 cases of occupational accidents. According to the result, researcher recommend that corrective action must be taken at each layer of HFACS as the safety protection system, both latent failures and active failures with the emphasis on improvement, which start from the organizational influences layer, followed by the unsafe supervisions layer, and then unsafe actions layer, while the improvement on the layer of precondition for unsafe actions becomes the last improvement. Improvement to organizational influences layer, unsafe act layer, and unsafe supervisions layer will have a positive influence on the layer of precondition for unsafe actions.
The safety performance of a company shows how well the company is in protecting employee safety and reducing losses due to work accidents (Sullivan, 2000). Safety performance in a company or organization is influenced by various factors, one of which is the human factor. In the loss causation model, (Bird & Germain, 1996) explains that there are five elements as factors that cause accidents, namely lack of control due to inadequate programs, program standards and compliance with standards, basic causes consisting of personal factors and work factors, causes direct actions consisting of non-standard acts and conditions, and the resulting harm to people, property and processes. PT. X is a Mining Service Company engaged in blasting. From the data of safety accidents that occurred at PT. X over the past 10 years, it was found that 60% of the main causes of these accidents were due to the human factor. The research in this thesis aims to determine the effect of human factors on the safety performance of PT.X and to analyze the most influential human factors in improving the safety performance of PT. X as measured by the level of work accidents. Based on the loss causation model and the basic causes of work accidents at PT. X period 2009-2013, there were six (6) human factors studied, namely competence, fitness to work, compliance with procedures, safety communication, safety awareness, and safety behavior. The result of the research is that competence and communication are the most influential human factors in improving the safety of PT. X.
This research examines work-related accidents in the mining industry categorized as injury cases, using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System in Mining Industry (HFACS-MI). The mining industry is known as a high-risk sector, where serious incidents such as major injuries and fatalities frequently occur despite investigations and preventive measures. The study aims to identify the main causal factors of workplace accidents based on the HFACS-MI framework, which classifies human errors and systemic weaknesses within mining organizations. Using data from injury-related accident cases in 2024, both qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to assess contributing factors from the operator level up to the organizational level.The findings reveal that the majority of accidents were triggered by unsafe acts, particularly skill-based errors, indicating deficiencies in workers' basic competencies. Additionally, latent failures, such as inadequate supervision and organizational inefficiencies, were also found to play a significant role.
Penelitian ini mengkaji kecelakaan kerja di industri pertambangan yang tergolong dalam kategori cedera, menggunakan metode Human Factors Analysis and Classification System in Mining Industry (HFACS-MI). Industri pertambangan dikenal sebagai sektor dengan risiko tinggi, di mana insiden besar seperti cedera kerja serius dan kematian sering kali terjadi meskipun telah dilakukan investigasi dan tindakan pencegahan.
Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor penyebab utama kecelakaan berdasarkan pendekatan sistem HFACS-MI yang mengklasifikasikan kesalahan manusia dan kelemahan sistemik dalam organisasi tambang. Berdasarkan data kecelakaan kasus cedera Tahun 2024, analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif dan kuantitatif terhadap berbagai faktor, dari tingkat operator hingga organisasi.
Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa kecelakaan paling banyak dipicu oleh unsafe acts, terutama skill-based errors, yang menunjukkan kelemahan pada kompetensi atau keterampilan dasar pekerja. Selain itu, faktor latent failures seperti lemahnya supervisi dan ketidakefisienan sistem organisasi juga berperan penting.
This research examines work-related accidents in the mining industry categorized as injury cases, using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System in Mining Industry (HFACS-MI). The mining industry is known as a high-risk sector, where serious incidents such as major injuries and fatalities frequently occur despite investigations and preventive measures. The study aims to identify the main causal factors of workplace accidents based on the HFACS-MI framework, which classifies human errors and systemic weaknesses within mining organizations. Using data from injury-related accident cases in 2024, both qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to assess contributing factors from the operator level up to the organizational level. The findings reveal that the majority of accidents were triggered by unsafe acts, particularly skill-based errors, indicating deficiencies in workers' basic competencies. Additionally, latent failures, such as inadequate supervision and organizational inefficiencies, were also found to play a significant role.
Pendahuluan: Di dalam industri hulu migas, cedera tangan dan jari merupakan tantangan besar. Setidaknya 50% dari kasus cedera di dalam industri migas merupakan cedera tangan dan jari. Di beberapa perusahaan, proporsi tersebut dapat menjadi lebih besar. Dalam analisis yang pernah dilakukan terhadap kecelakaan di perusahaan anggota IOGP, lebih dari delapan puluh persen diakibatkan karena factor manusia, baik yang disebabkan oleh faktor pribadi ataupun faktor organisasi. Studi ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis factor manusia di dalam kasus cedera tangan dan jari yang teradi di PT. X sepanjang tahun 2014 hingga 2020 dengan menggunakan kerangka HFACS. Metode: Penelitian dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder berupa data kasus cedera tangan dan jari di PT. X dari tahun 2014 hingga 2020. Hasil: Cedera tangan dan jari paling banyak disebabkan oleh skill-based errors dan routine violations. Kasus cedera yang diakibatkan skilled-based errors juga diperparah oleh pelanggaran aturan yang dilakukan bersama secara terus menerus (routine violations). Kondisi yang menjadi prekondisi dari tindakan tidak aman yang berkontribusi dalam cedera tangan dan jari paling banyak terkait crew/ resource management. berbagai faktor yang termasuk ke dalam kategori ini di antara lain komunikasi, koordinasi, perencanaan dan kerja tim yang mempengaruhi kinerja. Pengawasan yang tidak aman yang paling banyak terjadi adalah failed to correct known problems dan inadequate supervision. Inadequate supervision terkait dengan pengelolaan personil dan sumber daya termasuk pelatihan, panduan professional dan kepemimpinan operasional. Sedangkan failed to correct known problems terkait dengan kekurangan pada individu, peralatan, pelatihan atau area keselamatan lain “diketahui” oleh supervisor, namun dibiarkan tidak dikoreksi. Di level 4, pengaruh organisasi yang terbesar adalah Organisational Process. Organisational process adalah proses formal di mana visi sebuah organisasi dijalankan termasuk operasi, prosedur, dan kesalahan di antaranya. Kesimpulan: Gambaran HFACS pada kasus cedera tangan dan jari di PT. X sejalan dengan gambaran umum HFACS yang ada dalam industri hulu migas, kecuali di level 2 yakni preconditions for unsafe acts. Sistem pembelajaran kejadian di PT. X masih dipengaruhi oleh teori domino dan belum mengintegrasikan konsep faktor manusia secara menyeluruh. Kerangka HFACS dapat membantu PT. X dalam menelaah lebih dalam defisiensi di dalam faktor manusia untuk dapat menetapkan tindakan perbaikan yang lebih tepat.
Introduction: Hand and finger injuries have always been major challenges in upstream oil and gas industry. At least 50% of injuries in upstream oil and gas impacting hand and fingers. In some companies, the proportion could be larger. More than 80% of incidents in IOGP members were caused by human factors, both personal and organizational factors. This study aims to analyze human factors in hand and finger injuries at PT. X by using HFACS framework. Methodology: The study was conducted by applying qualitative descriptive analysis by using secondary data, investigation report of hand and finger injures from 2014 to 2020. Results: Skill-based errors and routine violations contributed in most of hand and finger injuries in PT.X. Routine violations were found as aggravating factors in skill-based errors injuries/ crew resource management were dominating level 2, preconditions for unsafe acts, it consists of coordination, communication, planning and team work that impacting performance. Unsafe supervision that occurred the most are inadequate supervision and failed to correct known problems. Inadequate supervision related to personnel and resources management including trainings, professional guidance and operational leadership. Failed to correct known problems related to deficiencies in individual, equipment, training or the safety area “known” to supervisor but left uncorrected. In level 4, Organizational process was the weak chain of organizational influences. Organizational process is a formal process where organization’s vision is implemented on Site, including operations, procedures. Conclusion: HFACS of hand and finger injuries in PT. X is in line with general HFACS description in upstream oil and gas industry, except for level 2, pre-conditions for unsafe acts. Learning from incident system in PT. X was still highly influenced by domino theory and has not yet integrated human factors. HFACS framework can help PT. X to dig deeper in human factors deficiencies in organization so PT. X can define more effective mitigation & preventive measures.
