Ditemukan 38 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Cervical cancer is still a serious problem for all women in the world. WHO recorded 36,633 cases or 9.2% of the total cancer cases Spending on health funds is limited, so it must pay more attention to promotive and preventive programs. WHO recommends that women do cervical cancer screening consisting of pap smears, IVA tests, and HPV-DNA tests. But the financial barriers faced due to the high cost of cervical cancer screening have been a problem until now. This study aims to determine the financing scheme for cervical cancer screening in various countries, the method used in this study is literature review. Search studies using online databases in the form of PubMed, ProQuest, and BMCPH. There were 9 studies used in this study that came from 8 different countries. From this study, it was found that there are 3 financing schemes for cervical cancer screening, namely financing by the government, financing through health insurance, and financing through donors/development partners. There is one integrated program in each country and is often referred to as NCSP. The connected programs and financing have an impact on the increasing participation rate of cervical cancer screening in various countries.
ABSTRAK
Latar Belakang. Bencana sebagai peristiwa yang mengancam dan mengganggukehidupan dan penghidupan masyarakat dapat mengakibatkan timbulnya korban jiwamanusia, kerusakan lingkungan, kerugian harta benda, dan dampak psikologis.Pembiayaan bencana mengakibatkan pengeluaran negara yang tidak sedikit dan diluarperkiraan. Besarnya kerusakan dan kerugian akibat dampak bencana di Indonesiasangat besar, sementara itu kemampuan pemerintah mengalokasikan dana cadanganpenanggulangan bencana setiap tahun hanya sekitar Rp 4 trilyun. Sistem pembiayaankesehatan di saat bencana menjadi salah satu faktor yang berperan mengurangidampak bencana, khususnya untuk membantu institusi pelayanan kesehatan dalammenyelenggarakan pelayanan yang baik dan efektif. Oleh karena itu masalahpembiayaan kesehatan menjadi sangat crusialMetode. Jenis penelitian ini adalah desain kuantitatif. Arah penelitian ini pembuatanmodel pembiayaan tanggap darurat di PPKK. Metode analisa yang digunakan adalahunivariat, bivariat dan multivariat melalui berbagai uji non parametrik danparametrik.Hasil. Adanya hubungan yang signifikan antara cakupan bencana, kegiatan tanggapdarurat, jumlah korban meninggal, jumlah korban luka, jumlah pengungsi dan lamafase tanggap darurat dengan pembiayaan tanggap darurat serta terbentuknya modelpembiayaan tanggap darurat dengan persamaan Pembiayaan tanggap darurat =e(14,296–0,870Cakupan bencana+0,533Jumlah korban meninggal+0,396Jumlah pengungsi+0,54Lama fase tanggapdarurat)
ABSTRACT
Background. Disasters as events that threaten and disrupt the lives and livelihoodscould result in human casualties, environmental damage, loss of property, andpsychological impact. State funding have led to disaster and not a little unexpected.The magnitude of the damage and losses caused by the disaster in Indonesia is verylarge, while the government's ability to allocate disaster relief reserve fund each yearis only about Rp 4 trillion. Health financing system in times of disaster to be one ofthe factors that contribute to reduction of disaster impacts, particularly to assisthealthcare institutions in carrying out good service and effective. Therefore the issueof health financing became very crusialMethod. This research is quantitative design. This direction of research fundingemergency response modeling in PPKK. The analytical methods used are univariate,bivariate and multivariate through a variety of non-parametric and parametric tests.Results. A significant relationship between the extent of the disaster, emergencyresponse activities, the number of fatalities, number of injuries, the number ofrefugees and the long phase of emergency response to the financing emergencyresponse as well as the establishment of emergency response funding model withEmergency response funding = e(14,296–0,870 Disaster coverage + 0,533 Death + 0,396 IDP’s + 0,54Emergencyphase)
The COVID-19 pandemic has a financial impact on the State of Indonesia, so the Indonesian government must think about a strategy for financing COVID-19 patient services. Hospitals that provide COVID-19 services can submit claims to the Ministry of Health to get reimbursement for patient care costs. In its implementation, there are obstacles experienced by hospitals when submitting claims, namely the high number of dispute claims. Dispute claims are claims that after verification by BPJS Kesehatan there is a mismatch between the Hospital and BPJS Kesehatan. This study aims to determine and analyze the description of the causes of the COVID-19 claim dispute in terms of input, process, and output factors at Matraman Hospital. This research is an observational study with a qualitative approach. The research was conducted at the casemix unit of the Matraman Hospital in September-December 2020. RSUD Matraman is a government hospital with a BLUD status that self-finances the operation of the hospital, so if this claim payment is delayed, the hospital cash flow will be disrupted. The Matraman Regional Hospital has submitted 157 COVID-19 claims for the month of service from March-August 2020. The number of claims that were dispatched was 94 files (60%), more than the number of claims that passed verification of 63 files (40%). The results showed that the cause of the dispute claim that occurred at the Matraman Regional Hospital was due to the results of the swab which was not attached, the medical resume was incorrect and also not complete. Matraman Regional Hospital immediately resolves the dispute claim case so that the claim payment is immediately disbursed so that the hospital cash flow is not disturbed
Background: Stunting is a condition of failure to thrive in children under five due to chronic malnutrition, especially in the first 1,000 days of life (HPK). Health financing including stunting, commitment by regional policy makers. Objective: To find an overview of the realization of health spending from the government for stunting at the Serang District Health Office in 2018-2019. Methods: This study used a non-experimental research design with a Distric Health Account (DHA) approach. Results: The analysis shows that the 2018 health budget states IDR 3,296,445,655,287 (10.73%) and an increase in 2019 may be IDR 3,429,111,553,700 (11.48%). Allocated costs for this type of stunting activity are mostly used for direct activities, in 2018 the portion reached 58.29% and in 2019 the portion was up to 100%. Viewed from the line item budget, the realization is mostly used for operational costs. In 2018 it was 91.63% and in 2019 it reached 100%. The type of stunting intervention shows that the Serang District Health Office has implemented but has not implemented stunting reduction instructions in 2018 and 2019. Conclusion: This study provides information that the adequacy of stunting financing in the Serang District Health Office in 2018 and 2019 is performance-based, but not all activities have been carried out according to new and commitment of policy makers in 2019
Achieving UHC has become the main goal of countries in the world and is expected to be achieved after 2015 in the form of improving the quality of health services. Based on the 2018 DKI Jakarta Province Health Service (SPM) report, health services, especially for people with Diabetes Mellitus (DM), have only been fulfilled 12.16% of the expected target. Therefore, the researcher wants to see the service for DM patients based on UHC in DKI Jakarta which is seen from 3 dimensions (Participation, Service and Financing). This research used a mix-method study design with secondary and primary data collection (in-depth interviews and data collection). The results of this study was found that JKN participation in DKI Jakarta akarta were 98.2%, DM screening was 30.1% and case findings were 61.38%, then the dimensions of primary health care services with plenary accreditation were 73.8%, non-communicable disease polyclinic availability 92.9%, 100% nutrition polyclinic, training nutrition education were 40.5% , drugs availability (sulfonylurea, glinide, metformin) and laboratory examinations (blood glucose, HDL, LDL, triglycerides and HbA1C). Dimension of financing the total amount of APBD for primary health care vs Hospital in 2019 Rp.623,501,224,722 vs Rp.126,897,825,643, BLUD Rp.907,101,636,329 vs. Rp.125,020,357,361 and in the category of Cost Recovery Rate <40% (16.7 vs 16.7%), 4060% (31 vs 50%) and >60% (52.3 vs 33.3%).It can be explained that there are still several dimensions of UHC to be further improved in order to achieve maximum UHC-based services, especially services for Diabetes Mellitus patients
