Abstrak

Pembatalan operasi elektif di RSUP Dokter Kariadi, sebesar 6,49% di atas angka standar tahun 2012 ( ≤ 5% ). Pembatalan operasi elektif dapat menyebabkan ketidakpuasan pasien, peningkatan biaya, lama rawat pasien di rumah sakit, dan mencerminkan inefisiensi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan pembatalan operasi elektif. Sebanyak 6,8 % operasi elektif dibatalkan karena alasan medis 106 (46,1%) dan non medis 124 (53,9%). Pembatalan operasi berhubungan dengan kondisi pasien, hasil laboratorium tidak normal, dan kesiapan operator. Sehingga disarankan untuk dikembangkan klinik pra bedah.

Cancellation of elective surgery at Doctors Hospital Kariadi, amounting to 6.49% is still above the standard ( ≤ 5% ). Cancellation of elective surgery could lead to patient dissatisfaction, increased costs, length of stay and reflects the inefficiency. This study aims to determine the factors associated with the cancellation of elective surgery. 6.8 % elective operations were canceled due to medical reasons (46.1%) and non-medical (53.9%). Cancellation of operations related to the patient's condition, abnormal laboratory results, and operator. It is suggested to develop pre ? surgery clinic.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami penerapan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Badan Layanan Umum (BLU) di RSUP Dr. Kariadi tahun 2006-2012. Materi penelitian ini terdiri dari proses-proses penganggaran termasuk perencanaan, implementasi, pengukuran dan evaluasi kinerja serta pelaporan. Disamping itu penelitian ini juga menggambarkan faktor-faktor regulasi, sumber daya manusia, komitmen dan kinerja keuangan, serta kendala-kendala yang dihadapi dalam proses penganggaran.

Dalam penelitian kualitatif ini, data diperoleh dengan setting alamiah. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan observasi, wawancara dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil pengumpulan data dianalisis dengan metode kualitatif menggunakan paradikma diskriptif.

Temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara umum Penganggaran Berbasis Kinerja Badan Layanan Umum yang ideal belum tercapai, dan para pegawai dan pimpinan kurang begitu memahami makna Penganggaran Berbasis Kinerja BLU. Faktor-faktor regulasi, sumber daya manusia, komitmen dan kinerja keuangan berpengaruh secara koordinatif, sehingga terdapat beberapa kesalahan dalam tahapan proses penganggaran termasuk perencanaan, penerapan, pengukuran dan evaluasi kinerja serta pelaporan. Penerapan Kurangnya komunikasi dan sistem aplikasi komputer yang sudah terintegrasi menjadi penyebab kendala dan permasalahan yang dihadapi dalam penerapan anggaran berbasis kinerja BLU.

This study aims to understand the implementation of Performance-Based Budgeting Public Service Agency (BLU) in Dr. Kariadi years 2006-2012. The research material consists of budgetary processes including planning, implementation, measurement and evaluation of performance and reporting. Besides, this study also describes the regulatory factors, human resources, commitment and financial performance, as well as the constraints faced in the budgeting process.

In this qualitative study, the data obtained with the natural setting. Data was collected through observation, interviews and documentary studies. Results were analyzed by the method of data collection using qualitative descriptive paradigm.

The findings of this study indicate that the overall Performance-Based Budgeting Public Service Board that ideal has not been achieved, and the employees and leaders understand the significance less BLU Performance Based Budgeting. Regulatory factors, human resources, commitment and financial performance in coordination effect, so there are some errors in the stages of the budgeting process, including planning, implementation, measurement and evaluation, and reporting. Lack of communication and application of computer application systems which are integrated into the causes of the problems and constraints faced in the implementation of performance based budgeting BLU.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui harapan dan tingkat kepuasan pasien terhadap mutu pelayanan dokter spesialis penyakit dalam pada poliklinik penyakit dalam instalasi rawat jalan RSUP Persahabatan di Jakarta, Indonesia. Jenis penelitian berupa kuantitatif dengan pendekatan cross sectional, sampel dipilih secara acak. Jumlah sampel sebanyak 198 pasien. Responden terdiri dari 63 kunjungan baru dan 135 kunjungan lama. Metode pengukuran kepuasan dengan menggunakan Importance Performance Analysis. Tingkat kepuasan responden umur tua (>= 55 tahun) lebih puas dibandingkan responden dengan umur muda ( < 55 tahun). Responden yang belum menikah kurang puas dibandingkan responden yang telah menikah. Responden yang tidak bekerja / non karyawan contoh lebih puas dibandingkan karyawan. Responden berjenis kelamin perempuan lebih puas dibandingkan responden berjenis kelamin laki-laki. Tingkat pendidikan SMP paling puas dibandingkan tingkat pendidikan SMA kebawah maupun D3/Perguruan tinggi. Responden dengan cara bayar tunai kurang puas dibandingkan dengan resonden cara bayar jaminan. Responden yang merupakan pengunjung lama lebih puas dibandingkan pengunjung baru. Responden dengan waktu tunggu lama (>= 60 menit) sangat tidak puas dibandingkan responden dengan waktu tunggu singkat (< 60 menit). Responden yang diperiksa dokter >= 15 mnt lebih puas dibandingkan responden yang diperiksa singkat < 15 menit. Untuk tingkat kesesuaian antara harapan dan kenyataan didapatkan hasil : untuk variabel kecepatan pelayanan kepuasan 38,4 %. Untuk variabel ketrampilan pelayanan kepuasan hanya 47,5 %. Untuk perhatian pelayanan, kepuasan hanya 44,4 %. Namun untuk penampilan pelayanan, kepuasan 58,6 %. Secara keseluruhan, tigkat kepuasan terhadap variabel pelayanan yang diteliti sebesar 37,4 %. Karakteristik responden yang merasa puas dengan pelayanan dokter spesialis penyakit dalam di instalasi rawat jalan RSUP Persahabatan adalah responden yang berumur tua, berjenis kelamin perempuan, kawin, bukan karyawan, pendidikan SMA, pengunjung lama, cara bayar jaminan, waktu tunggu yang singkat dan diperiksa lama oleh dokter. Dari sisi mutu pelayanan, kepuasan responden pada penampilan pelayanan. Secara keseluruhan, tingkat kepuasan responden terhadap mutu pelayanan dokter spesialis penyakit dalam masih sangat rendah.

 The purpose of this research was to discover expectations and satisfaction levels of internist service quality at Persahabatan out-patient department. This is a cross sectional quantitative research in obtaining the instrument, through a random sampling, and involved 198 patients as samples. 63 patients were new patients and the rest of them were regular ones. The application of the Importance Performance Analysis, measurement of satisfaction is carried out. Satisfaction level of more or less than 55 years old patients were higher than the younger patients (less than 55 years old). Unmarried respondents have lower satisfaction levels than the married ones. Unemployed respondents, have higher satisfaction level than employed respondents. Female respondents were more satisfied than male respondents. High school graduated respondent were the most satisfied respondents than junior high school graduated respondents and also diploma graduated respondents. Fee for service patients were less satisfied than insured patients. Regular patient respondents have higher level of satisfaction than the new ones. Respondents with longer waiting period (more than 60 minutes) truly unsatisfied if they compared to respondents with shorter waiting period. Respondents with longer examination period (more or less than 15 minutes) were more satisfied than the shorter ones (less than 15 minutes). The result of suitability level between expectation and reality were: services skill variable was only 47.5%. For service attention was only 44.4% but for service packaging the satisfaction was reached 58.6%. Over all, satisfaction level against researched service variables was 37.4%. characteristics of satisfied respondents on internist service at outpatient department of Persahabatan Hospital were geriatrics, females, married, unemployed, high school graduated, regular patients, insured patients, short waiting period, and longer examination period. Based on service quality, highest satisfaction level was on service packaging. Generally, respondent satisfaction level against internist service quality was very poor/low.