Ditemukan 33879 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Jumlah kasus kekerasan di Indonesia meningkat signifikan dari 20.499 kasus pada tahun 2020 menjadi 29.883 kasus pada tahun 2023, hal ini diikuti dengan peningkatan jumlah kebutuhan pelayanan kesehatan bagi korban setiap tahunnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran penundaan dan penolakan klaim pelayanan korban kekerasan di RSUD Tarakan Jakarta. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi kasus dan deskriptif kuantitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara mendalam, telaah dokumen, dan literatur kemudian dianalisis dalam bentuk tabel, grafik, dan narasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pada input, terdapat ketidaksesuaian pengetahuan sumber daya manusia dengan regulasi Jaminan Kesehatan Jakarta. Sebagian besar informan menganggap jaminan ini hanya mencakup korban perempuan dan anak-anak. Standar Prosedur Operasional yang ada masih bersifat umum. Pada proses, seluruh berkas klaim dapat diakses melalui satu pintu di klinik Bunga Tanjung. Pada output, dari 1.062 klaim korban kekerasan di tahun 2023, terdapat 202 klaim tertunda dan 17 klaim ditolak. Penyebab klaim tertunda meliputi berkas tidak valid, berkas tidak lengkap, koding tidak sesuai, dan tarif tidak sesuai, sedangkan klaim tolak disebabkan oleh otomatisasi sistem SIJAKA. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan peningkatan sosialisasi internal rumah sakit terkait Jaminan Kesehatan Jakarta, dan penyusunan SPO yang detail dan komprehensif untuk mendukung pengelolaan klaim yang lebih efektif.
The number of violence cases in Indonesia has increased significantly, rising from 20,499 cases in 2020 to 29,883 cases in 2023. This increase has been accompanied by a growing demand for health services for victims each year. This study aims to examine the delays and rejections of service claims for victims of violence at Tarakan Regional Hospital in Jakarta. The research employs both qualitative and quantitative descriptive methods, using case studies. Data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews, document reviews, and literature analysis, with the findings presented in the form of tables, graphs, and narratives. The study results indicate a mismatch between the knowledge of human resources and Jakarta Health Insurance regulations. Most informants believe that the insurance coverage applies only to female and child victims. Additionally, the existing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) remain too general. In terms of the claim process, all claim files can be accessed through a single point at the Bunga Tanjung clinic. Regarding claim outcomes, out of 1,062 claims for violence victims in 2023, 202 claims were pending, and 17 claims were rejected. Delays in claims were attributed to issues such as invalid files, incomplete documents, incorrect coding, and inaccurate rates, while rejected claims were largely due to issues with the automation of the SIJAKA system. This study recommends improving internal hospital communication about Jakarta Health Insurance and preparing detailed, comprehensive SOPs to support more effective claims management.
This study investigates the relationship between BPJS Kesehatan patient revenue and profit private hospital financial performance in Indonesia. As the largest social health insurance provider in the country, BPJS Kesehatan's influence on hospital revenues has raised concerns regarding its impact on hospital financial sustainability. This research uses financial performance indicators to develop financial performance index – Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), EBITDA Margin, Current Ratio, and Net Profit Margin (NPM) – to assess the financial impact from BPJS Kesehatan revenue. A partial model approach of multiple linier regression is employed using secondary data from seven private-profit hospitals listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2017 to 2022. The findings indicate a significant negative effect of BPJS Kesehatan patient revenue on the hospital financial performance index. Specifically, higher BPJS Kesehatan patient revenye correlates with lower performance across key financial indicators, including ROA, ROE, EBITDA Margin, Current Ratio, and NPM. This suggests that while BPJS Kesehatan revenue is essential for hospitals, it does not necessarily improve their financial health performance. The results highlight the need for hospitals to optimize their revenue mix and explore alternative financial strategies to enhance the performance.
ABSTRAK Nama : Weny Rinawati Program Studi : Kajian Administrasi Rumah Sakit Judul : Analisis biaya perawatan stroke berdasarkan Clinical Pathway di Rumah Sakit Pusat Otak Nasional Jakarta dalam pelayanan pasien Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional Latar belakang. Masalah yang sering dihadapi pada pelayanan pasien Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional adalah kesenjangan biaya perawatan pasien stroke dengan tarif INA-CBGs. Hal ini terkait dengan biaya perawatan dan Clinical Pathway. Tujuan. Mengetahui biaya perawatan pasien stroke di Rumah Sakit Pusat Otak Nasional. Metoda. Penelitian kuantitatif deskriptif mengikutsertakan 277 subjek penyakit stroke yang diperoleh di Rumah Sakit Pusat Otak Nasional Jakarta selama Januari – Juni 2015. Biaya perawatan stroke dihitung berdasarkan biaya satuan (unit cost) dengan menggunakan metode activity based costing dan Clinical Pathway. Hasil. Biaya satuan perawatan stroke iskemik dan stroke hemoragik berdasarkan Clinical Pathway, dengan memperhitungkan biaya investasi dan biaya gaji, tanpa memperhitungkan jasa medis berturut-turut adalah Rp 311,860,860.83 dan Rp 585,083,610.01; dengan memperhitungkan biaya investasi, biaya gaji, dan jasa medis berdasarkan tarif rumah sakit adalah Rp 321,682,940.73 dan Rp598,929,450.01; dengan memperhitungkan biaya investasi, biaya gaji, dan jasa medis berdasarkan tarif IDI adalah Rp 318,360,860.73 dan Rp 594,333,610.01; tanpa memperhitungkan biaya investasi, biaya gaji, dan jasa medis adalah Rp30,361,681.00 dan Rp25,698,199.46; tanpa memperhitungkan biaya investasi dan biaya gaji, tetapi memperhitungkan jasa medis berdasarkan tarif rumah sakit adalah Rp 40,183,761.00 dan Rp 39,544,199.46; tanpa memperhitungkan biaya investasi dan biaya gaji, tetapi memperhitungkan jasa medis berdasarkan IDI adalah Rp 36,861,681.00 dan Rp 34,948,199.46. Simpulan: Dijumpai selisih biaya perawatan berdasarkan biaya satuan dan Clinical Pathway, baik yang memperhitungkan biaya investasi, gaji, dan jasa medis, maupun tanpa memperhitungkan biaya investasi, gaji, dan jasa medis, dengan tarif layanan existing dan tarif INA-CBGs Kata kunci : biaya, Clinical Pathway, INA-CBGs, stroke
ABSTRACT Name : Weny Rinawati Study Program : Hospital Administration Title : Cost of stroke treatment based on Clinical Pathway in National Brain Center Hospital, Jakarta Background. Problem often encountered in patient care National Health Insurance is the gap between the cost of stroke treatment with INA-CBGs tariff. This is related to the cost of treatment and the Clinical Pathway. Aim. Knowing the cost of stroke treatment in the National Brain Center Hospital Jakarta. Methods. Descriptive quantitative study involving 277 subjects stroke obtained at the National Brain Center Hospital Jakarta during January - June 2015. The cost of stroke treatment are calculated based on the unit cost using activity-based costing method and Clinical Pathway. Results. The unit cost of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke treatment by Clinical Pathway, taking into account investment costs and salary costs, regardless of medical services is IDR 311,860,860.83 and IDR 585,083,610.01; taking into account investment cost, salary cost, and medical services tariff based hospital is IDR 321,682,940.73 and IDR 598,929,450.01; taking into account investment cost, salary cost, and medical services tariff based IDI is IDR 318,360,860.73 and IDR 594,333,610.01; without taking into account investment cost, salary cost, and medical services are IDR 30,361,681.00 and IDR 25,698,199.46; without taking into account the investment cost and salary cost, but taking into account medical services tariff based hospital is IDR 40,183,761.00 and IDR 39,544,199.46; without taking into account the investment cost and salary cost, but taking into account medical services tariff based IDI is IDR 36,861,681.00 and IDR 34,948,199.46. Conclusion. Found difference in the cost of stroke treatment is based on unit cost and Clinical Pathway, both of which take into account the investment, salaries, and medical services cost, and without taking into account investment, salaries, and medical services cost, with existing services and tariff rates INA-CBGs Keywords: Clinical Pathway, cost, INA-CBGs, stroke
