Ditemukan 40723 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Pendahuluan: Di dalam industri hulu migas, cedera tangan dan jari merupakan tantangan besar. Setidaknya 50% dari kasus cedera di dalam industri migas merupakan cedera tangan dan jari. Di beberapa perusahaan, proporsi tersebut dapat menjadi lebih besar. Dalam analisis yang pernah dilakukan terhadap kecelakaan di perusahaan anggota IOGP, lebih dari delapan puluh persen diakibatkan karena factor manusia, baik yang disebabkan oleh faktor pribadi ataupun faktor organisasi. Studi ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis factor manusia di dalam kasus cedera tangan dan jari yang teradi di PT. X sepanjang tahun 2014 hingga 2020 dengan menggunakan kerangka HFACS. Metode: Penelitian dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder berupa data kasus cedera tangan dan jari di PT. X dari tahun 2014 hingga 2020. Hasil: Cedera tangan dan jari paling banyak disebabkan oleh skill-based errors dan routine violations. Kasus cedera yang diakibatkan skilled-based errors juga diperparah oleh pelanggaran aturan yang dilakukan bersama secara terus menerus (routine violations). Kondisi yang menjadi prekondisi dari tindakan tidak aman yang berkontribusi dalam cedera tangan dan jari paling banyak terkait crew/ resource management. berbagai faktor yang termasuk ke dalam kategori ini di antara lain komunikasi, koordinasi, perencanaan dan kerja tim yang mempengaruhi kinerja. Pengawasan yang tidak aman yang paling banyak terjadi adalah failed to correct known problems dan inadequate supervision. Inadequate supervision terkait dengan pengelolaan personil dan sumber daya termasuk pelatihan, panduan professional dan kepemimpinan operasional. Sedangkan failed to correct known problems terkait dengan kekurangan pada individu, peralatan, pelatihan atau area keselamatan lain “diketahui” oleh supervisor, namun dibiarkan tidak dikoreksi. Di level 4, pengaruh organisasi yang terbesar adalah Organisational Process. Organisational process adalah proses formal di mana visi sebuah organisasi dijalankan termasuk operasi, prosedur, dan kesalahan di antaranya. Kesimpulan: Gambaran HFACS pada kasus cedera tangan dan jari di PT. X sejalan dengan gambaran umum HFACS yang ada dalam industri hulu migas, kecuali di level 2 yakni preconditions for unsafe acts. Sistem pembelajaran kejadian di PT. X masih dipengaruhi oleh teori domino dan belum mengintegrasikan konsep faktor manusia secara menyeluruh. Kerangka HFACS dapat membantu PT. X dalam menelaah lebih dalam defisiensi di dalam faktor manusia untuk dapat menetapkan tindakan perbaikan yang lebih tepat.
Introduction: Hand and finger injuries have always been major challenges in upstream oil and gas industry. At least 50% of injuries in upstream oil and gas impacting hand and fingers. In some companies, the proportion could be larger. More than 80% of incidents in IOGP members were caused by human factors, both personal and organizational factors. This study aims to analyze human factors in hand and finger injuries at PT. X by using HFACS framework. Methodology: The study was conducted by applying qualitative descriptive analysis by using secondary data, investigation report of hand and finger injures from 2014 to 2020. Results: Skill-based errors and routine violations contributed in most of hand and finger injuries in PT.X. Routine violations were found as aggravating factors in skill-based errors injuries/ crew resource management were dominating level 2, preconditions for unsafe acts, it consists of coordination, communication, planning and team work that impacting performance. Unsafe supervision that occurred the most are inadequate supervision and failed to correct known problems. Inadequate supervision related to personnel and resources management including trainings, professional guidance and operational leadership. Failed to correct known problems related to deficiencies in individual, equipment, training or the safety area “known” to supervisor but left uncorrected. In level 4, Organizational process was the weak chain of organizational influences. Organizational process is a formal process where organization’s vision is implemented on Site, including operations, procedures. Conclusion: HFACS of hand and finger injuries in PT. X is in line with general HFACS description in upstream oil and gas industry, except for level 2, pre-conditions for unsafe acts. Learning from incident system in PT. X was still highly influenced by domino theory and has not yet integrated human factors. HFACS framework can help PT. X to dig deeper in human factors deficiencies in organization so PT. X can define more effective mitigation & preventive measures.
Occupational accident cases in the cement industry, especially the packer area, are a serious problem that can have an impact on many things including productivity, safety, and worker welfare. Data shows that occupational accidents in the Packer area of the PT X Cement Industry in 2024 have increased compared to 2023, making it the area with the highest accident frequency in 2024. Occupational accident investigations and corrective actions have been conducted, but accidents continue to recur. This may be due to the absence of human factor analysis during the investigation process. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine contribution of human factors specifically latent conditions and active failures to occupational accidents that occurred in the PT X packer area during 2023-2024. This study was conducted using a descriptive analytical method using the Human Factor Analysis Classification System (HFACS) method. The results of the study showed that latent conditions contributed more to occupational accidents than active failures. The latent condition factors that contributed the most to occupational accidents included organizational climate, organizational process, resource management, and inadequate supervision. Meanwhile, the active failure factor that contributed the most was decision error. PT X needs to improve latent conditions at the organizational level and implement control to mitigate active failures in the packer area.
Kata kunci :Kecelakaan kerja, cedera jari dan tangan, divisi maintenance,penyebab langsung, penyebab dasar.
Hand and finger injuries commonly happen in maintenance division. This happenbecause type of work in maintenance division have various stage, workingalongside a running process, using complicated machinery, and time contraints.The objective of this study was to describe occupational accident and analyzeaccident causes hand and finger injury in Maintenance Division PT X. Thisresearch use mixed method research, that start with collecting accident data and indepth interview to 6 person hand and finger injuried, supervisor and management.The most direct causes were lack of knowledge of hazards present, improperdecision making or lack of judgement, and improper use of tools. The underlyingcauses were inadequate development of policies / standards / procedures andinadequate identification of critical safe behaviors. Workers have inadequateawareness to health and safety. The roles of supervisor are reminder workersabout safety issues. Management have made and developed work procedure toprevent accident.
Key words : accident, finger and hand injury, maintenance division, direct causes, underlying causes, supervisor, management.
Resiko bekerja di perusahaan migas PT X yang berlokasi di offshore Natuna adalah relatif tinggi. Sepanjang tahun 2018 – 2023 terjadi fluktuasi kecelakaan kerja di PT. X. Bahkan setelah dua tahun (tahun 2020 dan 2019) tidak terjadi kecelakaan kerja untuk kategori recordable injury (kasus di atas FAC), di tahun 2021 terjadi lagi 3 kasus (1 RWDC dan 2 MTC) dan di tahun 2022 terjadi 4 kasus (1 LWDC, 1 RWDC, dan 2 MTC). Di tahun 2023 terjadi 1 kasus (1 RWDC). Korban kecelakaan kerja di tahun 2021 didominasi oleh pekerja kontrak dan pekerja tetap sedangkan kecelakaan kerja di tahun 2022 dan 2023 semuanya terjadi pada pekerja kontrak. Sebagian besar kecelakaan yang terjadi penyebab langsungnya adalah unsafe acts. Sampai saat ini belum ada analisis menyeluruh dari data investigasi kecelakaan-kecelakaan yang telah dilakukan PT X untuk mendapatkan faktor-faktor penyebab dasar dari semua kecelakaan tersebut. Dengan demikian, penelitian perlu dilakukan, dan karena berhubungan dengan human factor, maka pada penelitian ini akan dianalisis faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan kecelakaan kerja tersebut dengan metode Human Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Tujuan: Menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kecelakaan kerja di PT X antara tahun 2018 – 2023 dengan metode HFACS. Metode: Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif analitik dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data sekunder yang digunakan berupa rekaman kejadian kecelakaan dan laporan investigasi atas 41 kecelakaan di PT X. Data sekunder tersebut kemudian diklasifikasikan sesuai dengan empat (4) tahapan kegagalan di metode HFACS, yaitu unsafe acts, precondition of unsafe acts, unsafe supervision, dan organizational influence. Pengklasifikasian ini divalidasi oleh dua ahli keselamatan kerja, di mana hasil validasinya relatif tinggi (96%). Hasil: Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa faktor-faktor HFACS yang mempengaruhi kecelakaan terbesar berturut-turut adalah adverse mental state (51,2%), skill-based error (39%), routine violations (34,1%), dan tools/technological dan resource management (masing-masing 31,7%). Kemudian disusul oleh decision error (29,3%), inadequate supervision (22%), failed to correct problem dan organizational process masing-masing (17,1%), lalu supervisory violation dan organizational climate masing-masing (9,8%). Kesimpulan: Faktor-faktor HFACS yang memengaruhi kecelakaan kerja di PT X dapat digunakan sebagai masukan untuk perbaikan program K3 perusahaan guna menurunkan angka kecelakaan dengan memprioritaskannya pada faktor HFACS yang bersifat latent failure baru kemudian pada faktor active failure-nya, karena latent failure - jika diperbaiki- akan menjadi kunci untuk mencegah berulangnya kecelakaan.
The risks of working for the PT X , an oil and gas company located offshore Natuna are relatively high. Throughout 2018 – 2023 there were fluctuations in work accidents at PT. X. Even after two years (2020 and 2019) there was no work accident for the recordable injury category (cases above FAC), in 2021 there were 3 cases (1 RWDC and 2 MTC) and in 2022 there were 4 cases (1 LWDC, 1 RWDC, and 2 MTC). In 2023 there was 1 case (1 RWDC). Work accident victims in 2021 are dominated by contract workers and permanent workers, while work accidents in 2022 and 2023 all occur in contract workers. Most of the accidents that occur are directly caused by unsafe acts. Until now there has been no comprehensive analysis of accident investigation data that has been carried out by PT X to obtain the basic causal factors of all these accidents. Thus, research needs to be carried out, and because it is related to human factors, this research will analyze the factors that cause work accidents using the Human Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) method. Objective: Analyzing the factors that influence work accidents at PT X between 2018 – 2023 using the HFACS method. Method: This research is descriptive analytical research with a qualitative approach. The secondary data used is in the form of recordings of accidents and investigation reports on 41 accidents at PT X . This classification was validated by two occupational safety experts, where the validation results were relatively high (96%). Results: The research results explain that the HFACS factors that influence the biggest accidents are adverse mental state (51.2%), skill-based errors (39%), routine violations (34.1%), and tools/technological and resources, respectively. management (31.7% each). Then followed by decision errors (29.3%), inadequate supervision (22%), failed to correct problems and organizational processes respectively (17.1%), then supervisory violations and organizational climate respectively (9.8%). Conclusion: The HFACS factors that influence work accidents in PT X can be used as input for improving the company's H&S program to reduce the number of accidents by prioritizing the HFACS factors which are latent failures and then the active failure factors, because latent failures - if corrected - will become key to preventing recurrence of accidents.
HFACS (Human Factor Analysis and Classification System) is an approach that has been widely used in investigating accidents to find out weaknesses in an organization. This HFACS consists of four layers, namely unsafe act, precondition to unsafe act, unsafe supervision and organizational influence. Accidents can be prevented by closing holes at each defense layer. The HFACS principle is implemented to identify factors that contribute at unsafe driving behavior at PT. X, an oil company in Indonesia. Based on research finding, drivers who commit unsafe behavior are drivers with age 44 - 55 years (77.7%), experience over 16 years (63.1%), carried out on public roads (80.6%), on the afternoon shift (81, 6%), with a position as a team member (64.1%) and in the northern part of the company (56.3%). Weaknesses at the unsafe act level are decision errors (58.3%) ie not consistently applying risk assessment and not implementing safe work procedures. Weakness at level 2 is adverse mental state (52.4%), namely lack of focus in driving. Weakness at level 3 is inadequate supervision (65%) lack of consistent level of supervision to conduct safety supervision. Weakness at level 4 is the lack of consistency in the implementation of operational processes (62.1%), namely the implementation of risk assessment in an organization
