Ditemukan 23812 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Hasil penelitian didapatkan prevalensi operator yang mengalami fatigue ringan 80,4% dan fatigue sedang sebanyak 19,6%. Variabel lama jam kerja, kondisi fisik/kesehatan, waktu tidur dan shift kerja merupakan variabel yang berhubungan dengan kejadian fatigue pada analisis bivariat sedangkan variabel yang paling berpengaruh pada kejadian fatigue adalah variabel shift kerja dimana shift kerja merupakan satu-satunya variabel yang berhubungan dengan fatigue pada analisis multivariat. Responden yang bekerja shift malam mempunyai peluang 11,046 kali dibandingkan dengan responden yang bekerja shift siang.
Kata kunci : fatigue, shift kerja, kondisi fisik/kesehatan, jam kerja, waktu tidur
Fatigue is the one problem faced by company related to occupational health and safety issues, mainly in company which applies shift work system. The porpuse of the research is to figure out of fatigue prevalence in geothermal power plant operator and risk factors related to fatigue that make its occurence. The design of this study uses cross sectional method, where the datas collect by using questionnarie of international fatigue research committee (IFRC), field observation, operational data and direct measurement. There are many factors which are associated with fatigue. But in this study, there are 11 variables that is taken. They are: age, body mass index, monotonous, working hours, sleep hours, physical/health condition, shift work, work load, lighthing, temperature and noise.
The result of study shows the prevalence of operator that is light fatigue 80,4% and medium fatigue 19,6%. The variable independent which is related to fatigue are working hours, physical/health condition, sleep hours and shift work (the result from analysis bivariate). In multivariate analysis the variable that is significant influencing of fatigue occurence is shift work with the odd ratio 11,04. It means the workers who work on night shift has opportunity to being fatigue 11,045 times compare to workers who work on day shift.
Key Word : fatigue, shift work, working hours, physical/health condition, sleep hours.
Workplace accidents are predominantly caused by unsafe worker behavior. This unsafe behavior can be influenced by, among other factors, the safety culture within the workplace. A key aspect of shaping safety culture is workers' perception of safety, commonly referred to as safety climate. Measuring safety climate is crucial for understanding worker behavior and developing effective safety programs, especially in high-risk sectors like the power generation industry, where PT X operates. This study aimed to ascertain the safety climate profile at PT X using a questionnaire developed by Todaro et al. (2023) and to analyze the frequency distribution of demographic characteristics (age, job position, employment status, length of work, and education level). The research employed a cross-sectional design with a descriptive analysis method. A total of 136 respondents were analyzed. Overall, workers' perceptions regarding safety implementation at PT X were good, with an average score of 5,19. The average scores for the various safety climate dimensions ranged from 4,56 to 5,35. Key words: safety climate, worker’s perception of safety, electricity power sector, demographic characteristics
Based on the literature review, there is a relationship between work distress and safety climate, which affects to work accidents. This study aims to determine the relationship of the dimensions of work distress to the safety climate. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 152 employees of a gas-fired power plant company at the Prabumulih site, Palembang, and two Batam sites, in the operation and maintenance department who were randomly selected as research respondents. Respondents filled out the Nordic safety climate (NOSACQ-50) and NIOSH Generic Job Stress online questionnaire. Data were analyzed using bivariate correlation statistical tests and linear regression. Company's safety climate showed an average result of 2.73 or at a sufficient level, required improvement in the commitment of the workforce to safety and safety priorities. There were 10.53% of employees who have low levels of distress, 77.63% of employees who have moderate levels of distress, and 11.84% of employees who have high levels of distress. Bivariate analysis showed that the variables of work distress on self-assessment, future work, and social support, showed a significant relationship with safety climate. Multivariate analysis showed that the variables of work distress in conflict and role ambiguity were the most dominant variables related to the safety climate. To improve safety climate, Company should strive to reduce workplace distress through controlling conflict factors and role ambiguity.
Safety climate is a worker's perception of the importance of safe behavior at work in relation towards policies, safety, procedures, practices, and overall safety interests and priorities. A poor safety climate will be characterized by increased worker stress, poor safety communication, and lack of support thus normalizing unsafe behavior, decreasing situational awareness, and increasing the likelihood of accidents. Safety climate measurements can be used by companies as a leading indicator in establishing / improving existing safety programs. This study aims to analyze the safety climate profile in the support point area at PT X in 2025 based on the dimensions of management commitment, safety communication, rules and procedures, supportive environment, personal accountability, and training. The research design used is cross sectional with data collection methods using questionnaires (primary data). The number of samples analyzed was 118 respondents. Data analysis was used through descriptive and inferential analysis (Mann Whitney and Kruskal Wallis Test). The results of this study indicate that the safety climate profile in the PT X support point area in 2025 is good, with an average score of 5.18. All dimensions measured get an average score of 4.98 - 5.31. The average safety climate score in the age, tenure, and education groups showed significant differences in the dimensions of management commitment, safety communication, and training.
ABSTRAK Nama : Alfina Hapsari Program Studi : Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Judul : Analisis Safety Leadership Pada Posisi Unit Pelaksana, Unit Pengelolaan Konstruksi, Pimpinan Proyek, Pimpinan Divisi, dan Pimpinan Departemen Operasi Proyek Infrastruktur di PT.X (Kontraktor Konstruksi) Tahun 2018 Pembimbing : Dadan Erwandi, S.Psi., M.Psi Industri jasa konstruksi memiliki resiko kecelakaan kerja yang tinggi. Sepanjang Agustus 2017 hingga Februari 2018, telah terjadi tiga belas kecelakaan konstruksi dengan tiga kasus fatality accident pada proyek pekerjaan jalan tol dan jalan rel di Indonesia. Safety leadership merupakan salah satu komponen penting dalam meningkatkan kinerja Kesehatan, Keselamatan, Keamanan dan Lingkungan (K3L). Penelitian ini mengkaji safety leadership model pada posisi pimpinan di proyek dan departemen operasi proyek infrastruktur PT X yang bergerak di bidang kontraktor konstruksi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan metode kuantitatif berdasarkan dua variabel utama dari safety leadership, yaitu leadership style (transformational leadership) dan best practices. Data penelitian didapatkan dari kuesioner dan wawancara pada subyek penelitian serta observasi mengenai penerapan K3L di lokasi proyek PT X pada bulan April – Mei 2018. Dari hasil penelitian didapatkan bahwa safety leadership masih kurang menonjol kecuali pada posisi General Manager. Hal ini dikarenakan kurangnya pemahaman mengenai kebijakan K3L, kurangnya komunikasi, lemahnya konsistensi dan komitmen penerapan K3L, serta kurangnya tindakan proaktif dan inisiatif saat menghadapi masalah K3L. Hal yang dapat diterapkan untuk meningkatkan safety leadership tersebut antara lain dengan menyusun dan melaksanakan program pelatihan safety leadership bagi semua level pimpinan serta menjaga monitoring pelaksanaan program K3L di tempat kerja. Kata kunci: Safety Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Best Practices, K3L
ABSTRACT Name : Alfina Hapsari Study Program : Occupational Health and Safety Title : Safety Leadership Analysis in The Position of Implementation Unit, Construction Management Unit, Project Manager, Division Manager, and Operation Department Manager of Infrastructure Project at PT.X (Construction Contractor) in 2018 Consellor : Dadan Erwandi, S.Psi., M.Psi. The construction industry has a high risk of occupational injury. Throughout August 2017 to February 2018, there had been thirteen construction accidents with three cases of fatality accidents in toll road and rail road projects in Indonesia. Safety Leadership is one of the important components in improving Safety, Health and Environment (SHE) performance. This study examines Safety Leadership Model at the lead position in the project and the operations department of the infrastructure project at PT X as a Construction Contractor Company. This study was a descriptive research with quantitative method based on two main variables of Safety Leadership, those are Leadership Style and Best Practice. Research data obtained from questionnaires, interviews, and observations on the application of SHE at PT X’s project location in April - May 2018. This research obtained that Safety Leadership is still weak except The General Manager. This is due to lacks of understanding of SHE policies, communication, consistency and commitment to the implementation of SHE, proactive and initiative action when facing SHE issues. This suggests that company should improve by preparing and implementing Safety Leadership training program for all manager levels as well as maintaining the monitoring of SHE program implementation in the workplace. Keywords: Safety Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Best Practices, SHE
Penelitian ini berupa analisis penyebab coal dust explosion accident di PLTU X tahun 2011 yang terjadi pada tanggal 14 Desember 2011 mengakibatkan kerugian yang berupa kerusakan coal feeder dan panel instrumen boiler, dan kerugian akibat terhentinya pembangkitan energi listrik selama masa perbaikannya. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif untuk menganalisis data primer dan data sekunder untuk menganalisis penyebab langsung, penyebab tidak langsung dan penyebab dasar. Penyebab langsung adalah interaksi bahan, alat dan proses sehingga terpenuhinya 5 kriteria dust explosion pentagon dan menciptakan ledakan. Penyebab tidak langsung terdiri dari prilaku tidak aman dan kondisi tidak aman. Prilaku tidak aman yang dilakukan adalah mengoperasikan mill saat terjadi gangguan blocking, membuka damper cold air terlalu cepat sehingga menciptakan terpenuhinya 5 kriteria coal dust explosion diakibatkan oleh pengetahuan akan resiko coal dust explosion, tidak tersedianya SOP, pengaturan mode operasi yang belum sesuai, dan kerusakan damper cold air. Sedangkan kondisi tidak aman terdiri dari gangguan blocking, kerusakan peralatan, dan desain coal feeder. Penyebab dasar adalah komunikasi yang sulit antara operator dan kontraktor EPC, ketidakjelasan mengenai tanggung jawab perbaikan, kurangnya pengalaman personel, dan tidak ada pengawasan mengenai K3 operasi. Risk assessment khusus pengoperasian mill perlu dilaksanakan untuk mendapatkan langkah-langkah pencegahan insiden coal dust explosion yang paling tepat.
This study analyzes the causes of a coal dust explosion accident at Steam Power Plant ?X? in 2011 which occurred on December 14, 2011 caused in losses such as damage to the instrument panel coal boiler feeder, and losses due to interruption of electric energy generation during repairs. The study was conducted with a qualitative approach to analyze primary data and secondary data to analyze the direct cause, indirect cause and basic cause. The direct cause is the interaction of materials, tools and processes that fulfill 5 criteria and creating a dust explosion pentagon explosion. Indirect causes consist of unsafe actions and unsafe conditions. Unsafe action consisted of operate mill during disturbances blocking, open the damper cold air too fast, creating the five criteria of coal dust explosion caused by the knowledge of the risks of coal dust explosion, unavailability of SOP, the setting is not appropriate mode of operation, and damage damper cold air. While unsafe conditions consisted of interference blocking, damage to equipment, and design of coal feeder. The basic cause consisted of a difficult communication between the operator and EPC contractors, uncertainty regarding the repair responsibilities, lack of personnel experience, and there is no oversight of the safety operation. Risk assessment should be carried out special operation of the mill to get the preventive measures coal dust explosion incidents are most appropriate.