Ditemukan 30767 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Process Safety Management (PSM) is one approach to controlling risk to the high hazard process by reducing the Loss Of Primary Containment (LOPC) of hazardous materials in a process that could potentially become a major event. As a way to reduce Loss Of Primary Containment (LOPC), it can be done by recording Process Safety Events (PSEs) information. This information is then recorded through the Process Safety Management (PSM) program and can become a requirement for an industry to operate. The framework for process safety, and the development of key performance indicators, is illustrated in the Process Safety Pyramid and is divided into 4 tiers. The four levels of the Process Safety Pyramid can provide various steps for process safety. However, it is important to choose highly relevant KPIs that can measure the integrity of risk control measures and provide an early warning system against system failures or systemic failures. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) for Tier 4 is a leading indicator designed to monitor the realization of a planned program, fulfillment of regulatory compliance, monitoring and recording, as well as efforts to resolve or corrective actions from recommendations that arise related to activities. in 14 elements. Therefore, a Tier 4 KPI is generally for measuring planned activities and the goal is to achieve 100% completion. In addition, Tier 4 indicators can also be used as an internal company tool for reporting and measuring the performance of each operating unit that needs to be continuously developed and adjusted to the actual conditions in the company (API 754). Based on the research that has been done, it can be concluded that PT.X has taken into account PSM in its operations, but there is still a lot of room for further development because there are still the results of calculating some elements that are classified as bad. This deficiency is caused by a lack of understanding regarding PSM from top management to operators.
Sekarang ini, di industri geothermal serta minyak dan gas, tren penggunaan tenaga kontraktor semakin meningkat. Hal ini tentu saja diikuti oleh meningkatnya resiko keselamatan kerja yang dihadapi oleh pekerja kontraktor, dengan demikian peran dari sistem manajemen keselamatan & kesehatan kerja kontraktor – Contractor SHE management system (CSMS) menjadi semakin penting untuk diperhatikan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan rendahnya tingkat implementasi CSMS di PT. X unit bisnis geothermal pada tahun 2011. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif komparatif, menggunakan elemen-elemen dalam panduan sistem manajemen OHSAS sebagai referensi untuk mendapatkan faktor-faktor yang akan diidentifikasi. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan sekunder, sedangkan pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan observasi lapangan, wawancara dan studi literatur. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan rendahnya tingkat implementasi CSMS di PT. X unit bisnis geothermal pada tahun 2011 adalah faktor dokumentasi yaitu kurang informatifnya form yang disediakan pada tahap pre job dan faktor sumber daya dimana belum ditetapkan sumber daya yang disediakan untuk menjadi representasi SHE. Saran yang diberikan adalah dengan merevisi form pada tahap pre job, kemudian dengan membuat penugasan tertulis mengenai sumber daya yang ditunjuk untuk malakukan peran dan tanggung jawab dari representasi SHE. Kata kunci, Sistem manajemen Kesehatan & Keselamatan Kerja Kontraktor.
Right now, in geothermal, oil & gas industry, the tren of using contractor workforce is increasing. Of course this condition followed by the increase of health and safety risk faced by the contractor’s workers. Therefore the role of Contractor SHE Management System (CSMS) become more and more important to be noted. The objective of this research was to identify the cause factors of CSMS low implementation rate in geothermal unit business of PT. X in 2011. This research using Qualtative methode with Comparative Descriptive design. This research using elements of OHSAS management system guideline as a reference to get theidentify factors which will be analyzed, the data used was primary and secondary. The research found that the factor which causing low implementation rate of CSMS in geothermal unit business of PT. X in 2011 was the factor of document, that the form of pre job phase which was not informative and the factor of human resource, that the resource for the SHE representative was not yet decided. It is sugested to revise the form in pre job phase to be more informative and to make a writen assignment of personnel who will take the role & responsibility of SHE representative. Keyword Contractor Safety Management System, CSMS
Globally, the mining industry has long been considered one of the most dangerous industries with great health and safety risks to its workers. The frequency of work accidents can be prevented by planning, implementing and monitoring Occupational Safety and Health (K3) in the workplace as well as the behavior of workers in particular and the community in general, who are starting to realize the importance of implementing OSH norms in the workplace. Maturity level of safety culture (safety maturity level) is very important for the prevention of unsafe behavior, especially various industrial sectors with high rates of injury and death. This concept aims to assist organizations in determining the maturity level of their current safety culture and identify the actions needed to improve their safety culture, so that the dimensions and aspects of safety culture need to be improved . The purpose of this study is to design a cultural measurement instrument that is appropriate to the conditions in the PT. XYZ with 10 research variables commitment & support, Leadership, policy & strategy, engagement & involvement, value, safety cost, competency & training, information & communication and safety performance, measured safety culture at PT. XYZ is based on a safety culture maturity level model, and looks at the relationship between safety culture dimensions. The method used in this study is a mix method, quantitative and literature study to select the dimensions of safety culture which are used as research variables with research sample of 123 people. The results were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results of the study show that the assessment of the safety maturity level with 10 (ten) dimensions of safety culture at PT. XYZ is at point 3.56 (Compliant to Proactive), there are 9 (nine) hypotheses that can be accepted, there is a significant relationship between Leadership (L) and Policy & Strategy (PS), Policy & Strategy (PS) dimension with Safety Cost (SC), Commitment & Support (CS) dimension with Process (P), Leadership dimension (L) with Engagement & Involvement (EI), Safety Cost dimension (SC) with Competency & Training (CT), Process dimension (P) with Information & Communication (IC), Engagement & Involvement (EI) dimension with Value (V), Competency & Training (CT) dimension with Safety Performance (SP) , Value (V) with Safety Performance (SP) and 1 hypothesis which is not accepted, there is no significant relationship between Information & Communication (IC) and Safety Performance (SP) dimensions.
This study analysis implementation of fire safety system at A and B buildings PT X in 2020 using Fire Safety Evaluation System (FSES). The purpose of this study was to know the condition of fire safety system at A and B building PT X. The design research was a descriptive with approach to semi quantitative. The building A and B are buildings for office activities. The evaluation was carried out for 12 safety parameters according to NFPA 101A: Alternate Approaches to Life Safety with the NFPA 101: Life Safety Code standard. The parameters evaluated are building construction, hazard separation, vertical openings, sprinklers, fire alarms, smoke detectors, 2 interior finish, smoke control, exit access, evacuation routes, corridors/ compartment and emergency response programs. Additional analysis was also carried out on passive protection system, active protection system, and lifesaving facilities in building A and B. The result showed that the implementation of fire safety at A and B building PT X still met the minimum value of fire safety in the office building based on the mandatory requirements in FSES.