Perilaku berisiko berkendara merupakan salah satu faktor utama yang berkontribusi terhadap tingginya kejadian kecelakaan lalu lintas pada pengendara sepeda motor. Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia (FKM UI) sebagai kawasan dengan mobilitas kendaraan yang tinggi memiliki potensi terjadinya perilaku berkendara berisiko, sehingga diperlukan identifikasi faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan perilaku tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan faktor internal dan faktor eksternal dengan perilaku berisiko berkendara pada pengendara sepeda motor di lingkungan FKM UI tahun 2026. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain cross-sectional dengan melibatkan 158 mahasiswa dan karyawan FKM UI. Variabel independen terdiri atas faktor internal dan faktor eksternal. Faktor internal meliputi karakteristik demografi, pengalaman berkendara, kepemilikan surat izin mengemudi (SIM), sensation seeking, dan pengetahuan keselamatan lalu lintas, sedangkan faktor eksternal meliputi kondisi kendaraan serta kondisi jalan dan infrastruktur. Perilaku berisiko berkendara sebagai variabel dependen diukur menggunakan Motorcycle Rider Behaviour Questionnaire (MRBQ). Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui kuesioner daring yang terdiri atas MRBQ, Brief Sensation Seeking Scale (BSSS), serta kuesioner yang disusun oleh peneliti. Analisis data dilakukan secara univariat dan bivariat menggunakan uji Chi-square. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 48,7% responden memiliki perilaku berisiko berkendara tinggi. Analisis bivariat menunjukkan bahwa usia (p<0,001), tingkat pendidikan (p<0,001), durasi mampu berkendara (p=0,006), riwayat kecelakaan (p=0,019), sensation seeking (p<0,001), serta kondisi jalan dan infrastruktur (p=0,023) memiliki hubungan yang bermakna dengan perilaku berisiko berkendara. Sebaliknya, jenis kelamin, intensitas berkendara, kepemilikan SIM, pengetahuan keselamatan lalu lintas, dan kondisi kendaraan tidak menunjukkan hubungan yang bermakna secara statistik. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, Universitas Indonesia bersama instansi terkait perlu memperkuat implementasi program keselamatan berkendara melalui edukasi yang berfokus pada pengendara muda, peningkatan budaya safety riding, pengawasan kepatuhan terhadap peraturan lalu lintas, serta perbaikan kondisi jalan dan infrastruktur di lingkungan kampus.

Risky riding behavior is one of the major factors contributing to the high incidence of traffic accidents among motorcyclists. The Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia (FPH UI), as an area with high traffic mobility, has the potential for risky riding behavior, making it necessary to identify the factors associated with such behavior. This study aimed to analyze the association between internal and external factors and risky riding behavior among motorcyclists at FPH UI in 2026. This study employed a cross-sectional design involving 158 students and employees of FPH UI. The independent variables consisted of internal and external factors. Internal factors included demographic characteristics, riding experience, driver's license ownership, sensation seeking, and traffic safety knowledge, while external factors included vehicle condition and road and infrastructure conditions. The dependent variable, risky riding behavior, was measured using the Motorcycle Rider Behaviour Questionnaire (MRBQ). Data were collected through an online questionnaire consisting of the MRBQ, the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale (BSSS), and researcher-developed questionnaires. Data were analyzed using univariate and bivariate analyses with the Chi-square test. The results showed that 48.7% of respondents exhibited high risky riding behavior. Bivariate analysis revealed that age (p<0.001), educational level (p<0.001), riding experience duration (p=0.006), history of traffic accidents (p=0.019), sensation seeking (p<0.001), and road and infrastructure conditions (p=0.023) were significantly associated with risky riding behavior. In contrast, sex, riding frequency, driver's license ownership, traffic safety knowledge, and vehicle condition were not significantly associated with risky riding behavior. Based on these findings, Universitas Indonesia and relevant stakeholders should strengthen the implementation of road safety programs through educational initiatives targeting young riders, promotion of a safety riding culture, stricter enforcement of traffic regulations, and improvements to road and infrastructure conditions within the university campus.

Mahasiswa rentan mengalami distress akibat berbagai tuntutan akademik maupun non-akademik sehingga dapat memengaruhi performa akademik mahasiswa. Resiliensi dipandang sebagai faktor protektif yang dapat membantu individu beradaptasi terhadap tekanan dan tantangan yang dihadapi. Namun, peran resiliensi sebagai moderator dalam hubungan antara distress dan performa akademik masih menunjukkan hasil yang beragam. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran resiliensi sebagai variabel moderator dalam hubungan antara distress dan performa akademik pada mahasiswa aktif Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia (FKM UI). Penelitian ini menggunakan desain studi kuantitatif dengan pendekatan cross-sectional. Penelitian dilakukan pada 353 mahasiswa aktif FKM UI yang dipilih menggunakan metode proportionate stratified random sampling. Kemudian tingkat distress diukur menggunakan instrumen Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), tingkat resiliensi diukur menggunakan Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), dan Performa akademik diukur berdasarkan Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif (IPK). Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan uji Chi-Square dan regresi logistik biner dengan variabel interaksi untuk menguji efek moderasi. Sebanyak 49,0% mahasiswa mengalami distress tinggi, 53,0% memiliki tingkat resiliensi tinggi, dan 59,5% mahasiswa memiliki IPK <3,71. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara distress dan performa akademik (OR=1,044 dan p=0,842). Resiliensi juga tidak berhubungan secara signifikan dengan performa akademik (OR=0,799 dan p=0,302). Hasil uji moderasi menunjukkan bahwa resiliensi tidak memoderasi hubungan antara distress dan performa akademik (OR interaksi=0,998 dan p=0,523). Sementara itu, tekanan akademik (OR=2,812 dan p<0,001) dan tekanan non-akademik (OR=5,247 dan p<0,001) terbukti berhubungan signifikan dengan distress. Resiliensi tidak berperan sebagai variabel moderator dalam hubungan antara distress dan performa akademik pada mahasiswa aktif FKM UI. Selain itu, tidak terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara distress maupun resiliensi dengan performa akademik. Namun, tekanan akademik dan tekanan non-akademik berhubungan signifikan dengan tingkat distress mahasiswa. Oleh karena itu, upaya promosi kesehatan mental dan pengelolaan tekanan akademik maupun non-akademik perlu menjadi perhatian dalam mendukung kesejahteraan mahasiswa.

Students are vulnerable to experiencing distress due to various academic and non-academic demands, which can affect their academic performance. Resilience is viewed as a protective factor that helps individuals adapt to pressures and challenges. However, the role of resilience as a moderator in the relationship between distress and academic performance remains inconsistent. This study aims to analyze the role of resilience as a moderating variable in the relationship between distress and academic performance among active students of the Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia (FKM UI). This study used a quantitative cross-sectional design. It was conducted among 353 active FKM UI students selected by proportionate stratified random sampling. Distress was measured using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), resilience was measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), and academic performance was measured by Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA). Data were analyzed using the Chi-Square test and binary logistic regression with an interaction term to test the moderating effect. A total of 49.0% of students experienced high distress, 53.0% had high resilience, and 59.5% had a CGPA < 3.71. Analysis showed no significant association between distress and academic performance (OR = 1.044; p = 0.842). Resilience was also not significantly associated with academic performance (OR = 0.799; p = 0.302). Moderation analysis indicated that resilience did not moderate the relationship between distress and academic performance (interaction OR = 0.998; p = 0.523). Meanwhile, academic pressure (OR = 2.812; p < 0.001) and non-academic pressure (OR = 5.247; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with distress. Resilience did not act as a moderating variable in the relationship between distress and academic performance among active FKM UI students. Additionally, neither distress nor resilience showed a significant relationship with academic performance. However, academic and non-academic pressures were significantly associated with students’ levels of distress. Therefore, mental health promotion and management of academic and non-academic pressures should be prioritized to support student well-being.

Compassion Fatigue (CF) merupakan kondisi kelelahan emosional dan stres yang direpresentasikan oleh Burnout (BO) dan Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS). Mahasiswa Profesi Ners berpotensi mengalami CF melalui pendidikan praktik klinik intensif pada berbagai setting pelayanan kesehatan. Namun, di Indonesia penelitian mengenai CF pada Mahasiswa Profesi Ners masih sangat terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis distribusi tingkat BO dan STS, serta hubungan antara faktor lingkungan kerja dan tugas atau pekerjaan praktik klinik, faktor klien atau pasien, dan faktor karakteristik individu dengan masing-masing BO dan STS pada Mahasiswa Profesi Ners Universitas Indonesia Tahun 2026. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain kuantitatif dengan pendekatan cross-sectional. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik total sampling pada Mahasiswa Profesi Ners Universitas Indonesia Tahun 2026 yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi, dengan jumlah responden akhir sebanyak 41 orang. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan instrumen baku seperti Professional Quality of Life Scale versi 5 (ProQOL V), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale versi 10 item (CD-RISC-10), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), dan Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa pada distribusi tingkat BO relatif seimbang antara kategori BO yang lebih rendah (51,2%) dan kategori BO yang lebih yang lebih tinggi (48,8%). Selain itu, pada distribusi tingkat STS sebagian besar responden (82,9%) berada pada kategori sedang. Keduanya menunjukan keberadaan BO dan STS sebagai representasi CF pada Mahasiswa Profesi Ners Universitas Indonesia Tahun 2026. Ditemukan juga faktor yang berhubungan signifikan dengan BO, yaitu faktor klien atau pasien berupa frekuensi pengalaman menyaksikan atau merawat klien atau pasien yang sekarat atau meninggal dunia (p = 0,045; OR = 3,792) dan faktor karakteristik individu berupa lama praktik klinik (p = 0,023; OR = 4,643) serta resiliensi psikologis (p = 0,010; OR = 5,833). Sementara itu, tidak ditemukan hubungan yang signifikan secara statistik antara ketiga faktor dengan STS.

Compassion Fatigue (CF) is a condition of emotional exhaustion and stress represented by Burnout (BO) and Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS). Nursing Professional Program Students are potentially at risk of experiencing CF through intensive clinical practice education across various healthcare settings. However, in Indonesia, research on CF among Nursing Professional Program Students remains very limited. This study aims to analyze the distribution levels of BO and STS, as well as the relationships between work environment and clinical practice task or job factors, client or patient factors, and individual characteristic factors with BO and STS, respectively, among Nursing Professional Program students at Universitas Indonesia in 2026. This study employed a quantitative design with a cross-sectional approach. Sampling was conducted using a total sampling technique among Nursing Professional Program students at Universitas Indonesia in 2026 who met the inclusion criteria, resulting in a final sample of 41 respondents. Data were collected using standardized instruments, namely the Professional Quality of Life Scale version 5 (ProQOL V), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 item version (CD-RISC-10), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). The results found that the distribution of BO levels was relatively balanced between the lower BO category (51.2%) and the higher BO category (48.8%). In addition, the distribution of STS levels showed that the majority of respondents (82.9%) fell into the moderate category. Both findings indicate the presence of BO and STS as representations of CF among Nursing Professional Program students at Universitas Indonesia in 2026. The study also found factors significantly associated with BO, namely the client or patient factor in the form of frequency of experience witnessing or caring for dying or deceased clients or patients (p = 0.045; OR = 3.792), and individual characteristic factors in the form of length of clinical practice (p = 0.023; OR = 4.643) and psychological resilience (p = 0.010; OR = 5.833). Meanwhile, no statistically significant relationship was found between the three factors and STS.