Ditemukan 37984 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Kata kunci: Kelelahan, Faktor Risiko, Pemadam Kebakaran.
Fatigue is a feeling of constant tiredness that can reduce the ability to perform a task in a safe and effective way. Firefighters work in 1x24 hours shift, this increase the risk of fatigue among workers. The aim of this study is to determine the risk factors related to fatigue in firefighters. The dependent variable in this study is the level of fatigue on firefighters. The independent variables in this study are divided into non-work-related factors (age, commuting time, sleep quantity, sleep quality, health condition and Body Mass Index (BMI)) and work-related factors (work period, other job and work variations). The sample of this study are a total of 56 firefighters. The data was collected subjectively using questionnaires. This study used Subjective Self Rating Test by IFRC to determine the level of fatigue and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index to determine the sleep quality. This study used Cross Sectional design to determine the relationship between the dependent and independent variable. Methods that used is quantitative (Chi-square) and odd ratio to determine the relationship level of the variables. Result showed 85,7% workers experienced low level of fatigue and 14,3% experienced moderate level of fatigue. Based on these results in line with the number of fire cases during the last month there were only 16 cases so that the workload of firefighters is not heavy. The results showed there is a relationship between workers fatigue and work period (OR= 7.2), health condition (OR = 5.0), sleep quantity (OR = 5.8), sleep quality (OR = 0.02) and commuting time (OR = 0.08). Therefore, control related to risk factors related to fatigue is needed.
Key word: Fatigue, Risk Factor, Firefighters
Kata kunci: kelelahan, pemadam kebakaran, faktor risiko kelelahan.
Work Fatigue is a physical or mental condition that occurs to workers and negatively affects their work performance. This study discusses the contributing factors for the occurrence of Subjective Work Fatigue in Bogor City firefighters in 2019. The number of respondents studied was the entire population, which is 54 workers. Measurement of fatigue using a questionnaire in the form of fatigue symptoms originating from the Industrial Fatigue Research Committee (IFRC) and the results showed that 36 workers (66.6%) experienced mild fatigue and 18 workers (33.3%) experienced moderate fatigue. The research design used was cross sectional using the quantitative method (Chi-square) and odd ratio to determine the degree of relationship between two variabels. The results of this study indicate the absence of variabels that have a significant relationship to the occurrence of fatigue.
Keywords: fatigue, firefighters, fatigue risk factor
Firefighters are at high risk of experiencing fatigue due to the demands of 24-hour readiness, exposure to emergency situations, and substantial physical and psychological demands at work. This study aimed to analyze the level of fatigue and the contributing risk factors among firefighters in City X, 2025. This study employed a cross-sectional study with a simple random sampling method. 138 participants who completed the OFER-15, NASA-TLX, PSS-10, PSQI, and IPAQ-7 questionnaires. The work-related fatigue risk factors examined included workload, work duration, length of service, commuting time, and occupational stress. Non-work-related factors included age, nutritional status, sleep quantity and quality, physical activity, and caffeine consumption. The results indicated that 15.9% of respondents experienced chronic fatigue, 18.8% acute fatigue, and 15.2% inadequate recovery time. 3 out of 5 work-related factors, specifically work duration, length of service, and occupational stress were significantly associated with both chronic and acute fatigue. Chronic fatigue was associated with work duration (p value: 0.028, OR: 3.519), length of service (p-value: 0.045, OR: 0.396), and occupational stress (p value: 0.015, OR: 4.969), while acute fatigue was linked to work duration (p value: 0.004, OR: 4.675), length of service (p value: 0.012, OR: 0.284), and occupational stress (p value: 0.037, OR: 3.267). Physical activity was the only non-work-related factor significantly associated with chronic fatigue (p value: 0.041, OR: 2.917). These findings highlight the need for fatigue prevention programs tailored to job types and individual conditions.
Karyawan merupakan aset bagi suatu perusahaan, maka mereka harus sehat. Tidak hanya fisik namun juga mental dan sosial, sehingga dapat hidup produktif secara sosial dan ekonomis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengctahui hubungan antara stres kerja dengan gangguan mental emosional. Metode : Penelitian ini menggunakan disain kros-seksional terhadap 189 subjek penelitian yang terdiri dari karyawan administrasi dan karyawan lapangan. Data yang dikumpulkan meliputi data umum sosiodemografi, pengukuran stres kerja dengan menggunakan kuesioner Survai Diagnostik Stres, penilaian gangguan mental emosional dipergunakan kuesioner Symptom Check List 90 (SCL-90), dan penilaian stres yang ada pada kehidupan seseorang menggunakan kuesioner Skala Holmes Rahe. Hasil : Karyawan yang diduga mengalami gangguan mental emosional, ditemukan sebesar 49,2%. Prevalensi karyawan administrasi lebih rendah dari karyawan lapangan (47,4% : 51,1%). Gejala gangguan mental emosional yang paling banyak adalah psikotisme (48,38%) dan somatisasi (46,24%). Karyawan administrasi mengalami stres kerja Iebih besar dibandingkan dengan karyawan lapangan. Karyawan dengan stres sedang mempunyai risiko 3,51 - 7,52 kali lebih besar, dan stres tinggi mempunyai risiko 5,69 - 97,50 kali lebih besar untuk mengalami gangguan mental emosional dibanding dengan stres rendah. Semua stresor kerja mempunyai hubungan bermakna dengan gangguan mental emosional namun yang paling dominan adalah stresor pengembangan karier. Untuk faktor karakteristik tidak mempunyai hubungan bermakna dengan gangguan mental emosional namun faktor umur, pendidikan dan jenis pekerjaan, mempunyai hubungan bermakna dengan stres kerja, dan yang mempunyai hubungan bermakna paling dominan dengan stres, kerja adalah pendidikan. Kesimpulan : Stresor kerja berpengaruh terhadap timbulnya gangguan mental emosional. Beberapa faktor karakteristik (umur, pendidikan, jenis pekerjaan) berpengaruh terhadap timbulnya stres kerja namun tidak sampai menimbulkan gangguan mental emosional.
Analysis of the influence of work stressor to mental emotional disorders among the agency and terminal company PT "S" Jakarta, 2001.Background and objective : As an asset to a company, employees must stay healthy. Not only physically but also mentally and socially, to be productive in term of social and economical aspects. The aim of this research is to study the relationship of work stress and mental emotional disorders. This study was using cross sectional design with a sample of 189 subjects. The data collected were data of socio-demography, measurement of work stress using "Survai Diagnoslik Srres" questionnaire, measurement of mental emotional disorders using Symptom Check List 90 (SCL-90) questionnaire, measurement of stress to the life of a person using Holmes Rohe Scale questionnaire. The employees who assumption had mental emotional disorders in this population was 49,2%. Administrative employees were less than field employees (47,4%: 51,1%). The dominant symptoms of mental emotional disorders were psycotism (48,38%) and soniatisation (46,24%). The administration employees had more work stressed than fields employees. Employees with moderate stress have a risk 3,51 -- 7,52 times more and high stress have a risk 5,69 - 97,50 times more for mental emotional disorder than those having low stress. All the work stressor had significant relationship to mental emotional disorders but the most was career development. Characteristic factor has no significant relationship with mental emotional disorders. On the other side age, education and type of work were significant with work stress and the most was education. Conclusion : Work stressor influenced the occurrence of mental emotional disorders. Some characteristic factors (age, education, type of work) would be able to influence the occurrence of work stress, but they did not create mental emotional disorders.
