Kebijakan Pendayagunaan Dokter Spesialis (PGDS) berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 31 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pendayagunaan Dokter Spesialis yang bertujuan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan dan pemerataan dokter spesialis di Indonesia perlu dievaluasi. Implementasi Pelaksanaan program PGDS mencakup beberapa tahapan yang meliputi perencanaan, pengadaaan, penempatan, monitoring, evaluasi, pembinaan dan pengawasan dan pendanaan. Namun, masih terdapat beberapa permasalahan dalam pelaksanaannya, salah satunya terkait dengan penempatan tenaga dokter spesialis di daerah tertentu, minimnya motivasi dan minat dokter spesialis untuk menetap di daerah, dokter spesialis lebih memilih untuk menetap di kota-kota besar atau daerah yang lebih berkembang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan Pendekatan teori Donabedian, Six Building Blocks of a Health System, Edward III, Van Meter Van Horn, Teori Minat Poerwadar dan Perpres 31 tahun 2019. Lokasi penelitian di Sumatera Selatan, Jawa Barat, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Sulawesi Tenggara, Maluku Utara, dan Papua Barat. Penelitian didahului dengan survei kepada 249 Dokter Spesialis Peserta PGDS, kemudian dilakukan wawancara medalam kepada 6 peserta PGDS, Ditjen Tenaga Kesehatan, Sekretaris POGI, Wakil Fakultas Kedokteran Undana, 6 orang Kasie SDK Dinkes Provinsi dan 6 orang Kasie SDK Dinkes Kabupaten, dan telaah dokumen. Temuan penelitian ini mengungkapkan adanya kesenjangan dalam tahap perencanaan, pengadaan, dan penempatan dokter spesialis di Indonesia. Distribusi Dokter spesialis belum merata, peserta PGDS tidak dapat langsung ditempatkan kembali di tempat penugasan awal, dari kebijakan PGDS yang bersifat sukarela dinilai lebih humanis, sarana prasarana dan alat penunjang medis di rumah sakit masih kurang. Kebijakan PGDS dianggap efektif terhadap peningkatan signifikan dalam jumlah kunjungan pasien. Kebijakan PGDS tidak efektif karena terdapat daerah yang masih kekurangan dokter spesialis dan waktu penempatan 1 tahun tidak efektif dan belum ada indikator keberhasilan Program Pendayagunaan Dokter Spesialis. Diharapkan adanya revisi kebijakan Peraturan Presiden nomor 31 Tahun 2019 terkait waktu penempatan dokter spesialis, dengan waktu penugasan minimal diatas 2 tahun dan membuat indikator efektivitas kebijakan PGDS untuk mengidentifikasi keberhasilan dan tantangan. Kata kunci: Efektivitas Kebijakan, pendayagunaan, dokter spesialis

The Policy of Specialist Doctor Utilization (PGDS) based on Presidential Regulation Number 31 of 2019 on Specialist Doctor Utilization, aimed at meeting the needs and equal distribution of specialist doctors in Indonesia, needs to be evaluated. The implementation of the PGDS program involves several stages, including planning, procurement, placement, monitoring, evaluation, development and supervision, and funding. However, there are still several issues in its implementation, such as the placement of specialist doctors in certain regions, lack of motivation and interest among specialist doctors to work in remote areas, as they prefer to settle in big cities or more developed regions. This research adopts a qualitative research method with the Donabedian Theory, Six Building Blocks of a Health System, Edward III, Van Meter Van Horn Theory, Poerwadarminto's Theory of Interest, and Presidential Regulation Number 31 of 2019 as the theoretical framework. The study was conducted in South Sumatra, West Java, East Nusa Tenggara, Southeast Sulawesi, North Maluku, and West Papua. It began with a survey of 249 Specialist Doctor participants in the PGDS program, followed by in-depth interviews with 6 PGDS participants, the Directorate General of Health Human Resources, the Secretary of the Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Medicine Undana, 6 Head of Subdivision of Human Resources Development from Provincial Health Office, and 6 Head of Subdivision of Human Resources Development from District Health Office, and document review. The findings of this research reveal gaps in the planning, procurement, and placement stages of specialist doctors in Indonesia. The distribution of specialist doctors is still uneven, and PGDS participants are not directly placed back in their initial deployment locations. The voluntary nature of the PGDS policy is considered more humane. However, there are still insufficient infrastructure and medical support facilities in hospitals. The PGDS policy is considered effective in significantly increasing the number of patient visits. However, it is deemed ineffective in areas that still lack specialist doctors, and the one-year placement period is not effective without indicators of the PGDS program's success. It is recommended to revise Presidential Regulation Number 31 of 2019 regarding the placement period of specialist doctors, with a minimum deployment period of over 2 years and to establish indicators for the effectiveness of the PGDS policy to identify its success and challenges. Keywords: Policy effectiveness, utilization, specialist doctors.

Competency testing is a crucial stage in ensuring the quality and competency standards of specialist doctors in Indonesia. The Indonesian Health Council (KKI) as the organizing institution faces challenges in the operationalization of the examination system, especially related to the limitations of the applications currently used, such as an unfriendly user interface, data input errors, and format inconsistencies. This study aims to develop a prototype of a web-based information system that is more structured, efficient, and easy to use, starting from the registration stage to obtaining a competency certificate. The research method uses a qualitative approach with interview and observation techniques for stakeholders, and uses the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) prototype model. The results of the study in the form of a prototype of a specialist doctor competency test information system that has been tested using the blackbox method show an increase in ease of use and accuracy of data processing. This system is expected to be able to improve the quality of competency test implementation and become the basis for the development of the KKI information system in the future.