Ditemukan 12 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
ABSTRAK Kecelakaan penggunaan alat transportasi laut yang bervariasi, serta penggunaan boat pancung sebagai satu-satunya alat transportasi Belakang Padang-Batam menjadi latar belakang penelitian ini, tujuannya ingin melihat bagaimana persepsi penumpang boat pancung terhadap penggunaan Life Jacket, meliputi persepsi penumpang terhadap kemungkinan mengalami tenggelam, dampak yang dapat ditimbulkan oleh tenggelam serta manfaat penggunaan life jacket. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif analitik, pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menyebarkan kuesioner pada penumpang boat pancung yang terpilih menjadi sampel. Dari 67 responden sebanyak 53 responden (79,1%) memiliki persepsi negatif terhadap kemungkinan mengalami tenggelam, 52 responden (77,6%) memiliki persepsi negatif terhadap dampak fatal akibat tenggelam,sementara sebanyak 41 responden (61,2%) memiliki persepsi negatif terhadap manfaat life jacket, kesadaran responden terhadap pentingnya life jacket kurang. Hal ini disebabkan oleh adanya anggapan jarak tempuh yang dekat, responden memiliki kemampuan berenang, responden belum benar-benar merasakan manfaat life jacket, life jacket tidak tersedia, kalaupun ada tidak mencukupi jumlah semua penumpang, design life jacket yang berat dan membuat tidak nyaman saat mengenakannya, serta life jacket yang tidak terawat. Promosi, sosialisasi serta advokasi manfaat penggunaan life jacket dapat dilakukan oleh semua orang, contohnya pemegang program UKK (Unit Kesehatan Kerja) PUSKESMAS, PPMS, Organisasi Masyarakat, pihak Kecamatan dan Dinas Perhubungan.
ABSTRACT Accidents use varied marine transportation, and use of boat strike as the only means of transportation from Batam to Belakang Padang its background of the study, the objective would like to see how the passenger boat perception against the usage of the Life Jacket, including passenger perception of the possibility of having drowned, the impact caused by drowning and benefits of the use of life jackets. This research is a descriptive analytic, data collection is done by distributing questionnaires for passenger boat was elected to the sample. Of the 67 respondents, 53 respondents (79.1%) had a negative perception of the possibility of having drowned, 52 respondents (77.6%) had negative perceptions of the impact caused fatal sinking, while as many as 41 respondents (61.2%) had a negative perception the benefits of life jackets, less respondent awareness of the importance of life jackets. caused by the belief that short travel distance, the respondent has ability to swim, respondent not considering the benefits of life jackets, less availability of the life jackets for all passengers, the life jackets design are heavy and uncomfortable for the passengers , as well as life jackets are not fully maintained. Promotion, dissemination and advocacy of the benefits of the use of life jackets can be done by everyone, for example holder UKK program (Health Unit) Public Health, PPMS, Civil Society Organizations, the District and the Department of Transportation.
Objective: To conduct a safety climate analysis on a project that implements BBS in mega project XY, since safety climate is an important predictor of behavior and outcomes to build a good and safe attitude and perception of safety. Methods: The research used is semi-quantitative and qualitative with a descriptive analytical approach using questionnaires, group discussion forums and secondary data from P2K3 project reports. Result: Almost all respondent variables of contractor X was getting a higher score than contractor Y, the safety climate of contractors who implement the BBS program was better than contractors who do not apply BBS. In this study, it was also found that there was no difference in perceptions of (conative) construction workplace pressure between contractor X and Y. Conclusion: From the results of this study, it can be seen that the BBS program that has been implemented in mega project XY for almost 2 years, when it measured on the psychological aspect and workers' perceptions has had a positive impact and it has a better safety climate when compared to contractors who did not implement this program
The construction sector is one sector that significant contributors to most accidents in Indonesia. Most accidents are caused by the perception of workers who do not consider safety to be a top priority. Preventing accidents requires a good safety culture in the workplace. Therefore, one approach that can be taken is by understanding workers' perceptions of safety, which is known as the safety climate. This thesis aims to provide an overview of the safety climate through a survey of workers' perceptions of management commitment, OSH communication, OSH rules and procedures, OSH training, personal accountability, and a supportive environment. Descriptive research design and proportional stratified random sampling method were used in this study. The results of this study indicate that the safety climate in the construction project is in good condition. Workers' perceptions of the management commitment dimension get the best score from the six safety climate dimensions. This shows that workers put their trust in the implementation of occupational safety and health that has been carried out by the company in the workplace. In addition, the dimension of personal accountability needs to be considered in order to eliminate workers' feelings of worry about the risk of accidents in the workplace.
THIS STUDY DISCUSSED THE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FACTORS THAT AFFECTED THE PERCEPTION OF MOTORCYCLE SAFETY DRIVING IN FKM UI STUDENTS. INTERNAL FACTORS SUCH AS KNOWLEDGE, EXPERIENCE, AND DRIVING SAFETY MOTIVATION, EXTERNAL FACTORS WERE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, PEER INFLUENCE, AND UI POLICY BY USED QUESTIONNAIRES. THE STUDY DESIGN WAS CROSS-SECTIONAL. THE SAMPLE WAS 69 STUDENTS WHO DRIVE MOTORCYCLES. THE RESULTS SHOWED GOOD PERCEPTION, THAT WAS CONSIDERING THE SAFETY OF DRIVING WAS IMPORTANT. AN INTERNAL FACTOR WAS THE MOST DOMINANT EXPERIENCED, WHILE EXTERNAL FACTORS WERE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, PEER INFLUENCE, AND UI POLICY. NEED TO IMPROVED THE KNOWLEDGE AND MOTIVATION OF MOTORCYCLE SAFETY DRIVING SUCH AS SOCIALIZATION AND SELECTION OF AMBASSADORS OF SAFETY KEYWORDS: PERCEPTIONS OF SAFETY DRIVING, INTERNAL FACTOR, EXTERNAL FACTOR.
The high rate of unsafe actions and unsafe conditions encountered by PT X over the past year indicates that the company needs to build more positive safety climate. These factors pose a significant risk of occupational accidents. This study aims to assess the safety climate at PT X by exploring workers' perceptions of safety using NOSACQ-50. PT X has never measured the safety climate. This study is semi-quantitative study with cross-sectional study design. In 124 samples, proportionate stratified random sampling was used so that each stratum in the population could be represented proportionally. The findings revealed that the overall safety climate at PT X was categorized as good, with an average score of 3.34. This indicates that the majority of workers possess a positive perception of safety. The highest score was observed in the dimension of workers’ commitment to safety, reflecting a strong individual commitment to safe behavior. However, workers' perceptions of management safety empowerment, management safety justice, and workers’ safety priority and risk non-acceptance still need attention to be improved. Interventions such as ongoing safety training, worker empowerment, strengthening safety communication, and establishing a positive work culture can be made to strengthen workers' perceptions and overall safety climate.
The manufacturing sector is more likely to face challenges in safety implementation due to its high-risk operational nature. Measuring safety climate is essential to evaluate how well safety efforts are understood and practiced by workers. Safety climate reflects employees’ shared perceptions of safety values, policies, and practices in the workplace. This study aims to assess the safety climate among production workers at PT X, focusing on six dimensions: management commitment, safety communication, safety rules and procedures, supportive environment, personal accountability, and safety training, and to identify areas needing improvement. A quantitative, cross-sectional design was used, employing a self-administered questionnaire adapted from Lestari et al. (2020). Data from 81 respondents were analyzed using mean difference tests. The safety climate was rated as good, with a mean score of 5.14 out of 6.00. No significant differences were found across demographic groups, except for perceived management commitment, which varied by length of service. Findings highlight the importance of genuine management commitment in fostering a strong safety culture. However, improvement is still needed in personal accountability and safety training to enhance overall safety performance at PT X.
Safety climate is a worker's perception of the importance of safe behavior at work in relation towards policies, safety, procedures, practices, and overall safety interests and priorities. A poor safety climate will be characterized by increased worker stress, poor safety communication, and lack of support thus normalizing unsafe behavior, decreasing situational awareness, and increasing the likelihood of accidents. Safety climate measurements can be used by companies as a leading indicator in establishing / improving existing safety programs. This study aims to analyze the safety climate profile in the support point area at PT X in 2025 based on the dimensions of management commitment, safety communication, rules and procedures, supportive environment, personal accountability, and training. The research design used is cross sectional with data collection methods using questionnaires (primary data). The number of samples analyzed was 118 respondents. Data analysis was used through descriptive and inferential analysis (Mann Whitney and Kruskal Wallis Test). The results of this study indicate that the safety climate profile in the PT X support point area in 2025 is good, with an average score of 5.18. All dimensions measured get an average score of 4.98 - 5.31. The average safety climate score in the age, tenure, and education groups showed significant differences in the dimensions of management commitment, safety communication, and training.
