Ditemukan 36519 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Waste Recycle Facility TPS3R is one of the solutions in waste management, but the implementation of TPS3R experiences many obstacles. The community and area developers are not interested in recycling because they incur high costs and are considered unprofitable, so it needs to be convinced that the construction of waste recycling facilities has a beneficial value. The purpose of this study was to determine the economic feasibility of waste recycling facilities (TPS3R) and temporary dumpsite (TPS). This research is a descriptive quantitative case study research in TPS3R Mutiara Bogor Raya and TPS Katulampa as the unit of analysis. The analytical method uses Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA). The results showed the total cost of TPS3R was Rp.549,980,813, the total benefit of TPS3R was Rp.728,616,000, with a net value of TPS3R was Rp.178,635,187 and BCR was 1.32. The total cost of the TPS was Rp. 285.208.500, the total benefit of the TPS was Rp.179,040,000, with a net value of TPS was Rp-106.168.500 and BCR was 0.62. The conclusion of this research is that TPS3R waste management is more profitable and feasible than TPS "managing waste using the dumping collection method".
Markets are the second largest contributor to waste in Indonesia after households. Most market waste is still managed using traditional methods that are inadequate, namely waste is collected and transported to temporary shelter, then transported by trucks for disposal, without processing. This study aims to assess the economic feasibility of waste management at X Market and Y market by considering the costs and benefits involved. A descriptive quantitative approach based on a case study of economic evaluation using Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) was applied to compare waste management at X Market with waste management at Y Market. The total cost of waste management at X Market amounted to Rp593,412,023, with total benefits is Rp31,707,992. From the total costs and total benefits, a net value of -561,704,031 and a BCR of 0.053 were obtained. The total costs for Y Market amounted to Rp662,910,538, and the total benefits obtained is Rp11,406,250, resulting in a net value of -651,504,288 and a BCR of 0.017 were obtained. This study concludes that waste management at X Market is relatively more feasible than at Y Market, although both are unprofitable and economically unfeasible to implement.
Kata Kunci: Pengelolaan Sampah Padat, TPS3R, Bank Sampah, Efektivitas, Akses.
In Indonesia, waste reduction efforts are done through TPS3R and waste bank with a national target of 30% in the period 2017-2025 under Presidential Regulation No.97 Year 2017. An effective waste reduction effort can be measured by two indicators, namely primary indicators through the percentage of recycled waste, and other indicators related to legal, monitoring, financial, service coverage, and community participation. This research aims to know the percentage of waste managed in TPS3R and waste bank in 3 cities, Depok City, Bogor City, and South Tangerang City. The type of this research is cross-sectional which sourced from recording data, regional policy, and official government news. The results showed that the percentage effectiveness of waste reduction to landfill in three cities has not reached the target that is still below 5%. The highest effectiveness of waste reduction by TPS3R and waste bank was achieved by Depok City which had 3R related local regulation. The city with largest budgeting allocation for waste management is Depok City, but Bogor City with a budget allocation of 2.2% can achieve the value of half effectiveness of Depok City and the highest percentage of training and monitoring from government among the three cities. South Tangerang City with the best coverage of TPS3R services has the lowest effectiveness value despite its high Human Development Index value. The effectiveness of the three cities still not yet reached a national target of waste reduction efforts with the percentage of effectiveness achieved by TPS3R higher than the waste bank.
Key words: Solid Waste Management, TPS3R, Waste Bank, Effectiveness, Access.
Waste management facility based on reuse, reduce, and recycle principles or tempat pengolahan sampah reuse, reduce, and recylce (TPS 3R) workers are a high-risk occupational group for work-related diseases such as diarrhea due to frequent direct contact with waste. This study aims to examine the relationship between individual characteristics, personal hygiene, and environmental conditions with the incidence of diarrhea among TPS 3R workers in DKI Jakarta Province. A cross-sectional quantitative design was employed involving 62 respondents from 12 TPS 3R sites. Data were collected through questionnaires and observations and analyzed using chi-square tests. The results showed significant associations between diarrhea incidence and work duration (p=0.033; OR=5.077; 95% CI: 1.138–22.650), use of personal protective equipment (PPE) (p=0.004; OR=0.150; 95% CI: 0.042–0.541), and the presence of disease vectors (p=0.038; OR=3.600; 95% CI: 1.075–12.059). Meanwhile, variables such as age, gender, education level, and several indicators of personal hygiene and environmental conditions showed no significant associations. These findings highlight the importance of promoting protective equipment usage and vector control as key measures to prevent diarrhea among TPS 3R workers.
Based on the Global TB Report, Indonesia still ranks third in the world as the country with the largest estimated case after India and China. Cases found in Indonesia in 2021 have reached 403,760 cases or 49% of the estimated existing cases (824,000 cases). One of the regions in Indonesia, namely East Jakarta, has the highest number of tuberculosis cases in DKI Jakarta Province with a total of 11,988 cases (31.1%). Tuberculosis is a disease that can be caused by environmental and demographic factors. This study aims to analyze the determinants between climate and demographic factors with tuberculosis cases in East Jakarta during 2018-2020 using ecological studies and spatial analysis, and the unit of analysis in this study is all tuberculosis patients in 10 sub-districts in East Jakarta. The results showed that population density did not have a significant relationship with Tuberculosis cases (p = 0.593) with a very weak relationship and a positive pattern (r = 0.102), as well as the results of correlation analysis on climatic factors such as rainfall (r = 0.116). , humidity ( r = 0.238 ) , and air temperature ( r = -0.172 ) have the same results , namely there is no significant relationship or p value > 0.05 . The results of the spatial analysis are obtained, that there is no spatial relationship between Tuberculosis cases with climatic and demographic factors. The conclusion in this study, there is no significant relationship between tuberculosis cases with climatic and demographic factors, both statistically and spatially.
