Ditemukan 39564 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Background: PPI is one of the chapters in SNARS Edition 1 covering 9 focus areas. Currently, there is no analysis of the achievement of PPI standards based on hospital ownership with secondary data from SNARS Edition 1 in Indonesia. Cross sectional using KARS secondary data. Samples of all accredited hospitals in 2018-2019 were tested based on ownership variables. Results and Discussion: There were 1,271 hospitals with government hospitals (537 hospitals) and private hospitals (734 hospitals). Area 4 focuses on the highest score on regulation of sterilization services, linen management and the lowest score on the guarantee of sterilization and disinfection processes outside of CSSD, evidence of PPI compliance monitoring in third party sterilization services and third party linen management must meet quality certification. Focus Area 8, the highest score on the regulation of the placement of patients with airborne infections, hand hygiene and personal protective equipment and the lowest score on the evidence of IPCN monitoring on the placement of patients with low immunity, on the placement and transfer process of airborne disease patients and hospitals providing negative pressure isolation rooms. Conclusion: The highest value of Focus Area 4 was obtained on the elements of regulation of sterilization services and linen management. The highest value of Focus Area 8 was obtained on the elements of regulation of the placement of patients with airborne infections, hand hygiene, personal protective equipment
Background: Pharmaceutical services in hospitals have been regulated by the issuance of Minister of Health regulation number 72 in 2016. Accreditation as an acknowledgment of service quality in hospitals standard for pharmaceutical and medication services in the PKPO chapter which consists of 7 standards and 80 assessment elements. SNARS as an accreditation guideline issued by the Indonesian Commission on Accreditation of Hospital (KARS), an independent agency approved by the Minister of Health, to assess the implementation of services according to standards. Not yet known the suitability and challenges of pharmaceutical and medication services in hospitals toward SNARS including supporting factors and obstacles in meeting the accreditation standards. Methods: Mix-methods. Cross sectional uses secondary data from the KARS database. The sample is the total population, tested based on variable type, ownership, class and hospital province towards mean value of PKPO. Qualitative with in-depth interviews with KARS surveyors and hospital assistants. Results & Discussion: 1.725 hospital were obtained with a mean PKPO final score of 79.16. There are significant differences in ownership (Government, Private) (p = 0.001), class (A, B, C, D) (p < 0,001), and Province (p < 0,001). Based on the focus area, the highest mean values are in storage standards for types (General and Specialist), ownership (government and private), in classes (B, C, D), and provinces, while prescribing and copying standards in class A hospitals. The lowest mean value in the monitoring standard for all variables. Conclusions: Storage standards become the strength of hospital pharmacy services in Indonesia to the compliance of SNARS. Monitoring standard be a challenge to SNARS compliance in types (General and Specialist), ownership (government and private), class (A, B, C, D), and provincial hospitals in Indonesia.
The hospital as an advanced health facility is expected to provide complete services. In the process it is in line with the objectives of Hospital Accreditation in order to get quality recognition and prioritize Patient Safety. The purpose of this study was to determine the readiness to fulfill Infection Prevention and Control standards according to SNARS first edition in Mitra Jambi Hospital in terms of problem solving cycle. The research method used is qualitative research where the data collection is done by in- depth interviews and document review. The research results show that in terms of input to human resources, facilities and infrastructure, budgeting and instruments have been maximized despite various limitations and conditions of hospitals that are still operating. In terms of the process for fulfilling human resources qualifications, it is sufficient even though training on training is still minimal and limited to internal training or comparative studies to other hospitals. Procurement of infrastructure is also still using priority directly related to services such as the procurement of hand rubs and hand soap hand washing programs and Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD) units, laundry and nutrition for equipment and rooms that comply with Infection Prevention and Control standards. Financing is still constrained due to the limited availability of funds but can be optimized. The implementation of the instrument which includes monitoring evaluation is considered to be still not maximal but has gone well. As an output, the achievement of meeting Infection Prevention and Control standards through self-assessment from all parts of the input is considered sufficient and able to deal with the hospital accreditation process. In conclusion, the readiness of human resources, infrastructure, policies/ regulations, budgeting as well as the PPI Standard instruments have been largely fulfilled and are ready to face hospital accreditation surveys. Suggestion to Infection Prevention and Control Committee and Infection Prevention and Control Nurse (IPCN), Nurse Department, Hospital Management and also Accreditation Team to continuous coordination each other to achieve feedback, regularly socialization for educational of Infection Prevention and Control standard to staff and also patient with their family, goals to maintain and increasing hospital quality thorough Infection Prevention and Control.
The implementation of hospital accreditation is a government effort to improve the quality of service and safety of patients in hospitals and the requirements that must be met by each hospital serving the National Health Insurance Program (JKN). Quality and Patient Safety Improvement (PMKP) is one of the most important accreditation standards in hospitals and is a new program that runs in Cempaka Putih Hospital. The researcher felt that it was necessary to find out how prepared the Cempaka Putih Hospital was towards the PMKP standard in accordance with SNARS Issue 1 so as to create a quality and patient safety culture. This type of research is desktiptif research with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Collection and analysis of quantitative data using a questionnaire then continued with the collection and analysis of qualitative data with indepth interviews. The results showed that the readiness of Cempaka Putih Hospital in the implementation of the PMKP program was only around 50%, it still needed gradual improvement efforts. Action plans that can be taken to improve the efficiency of the PMKP program implementation at Cempaka Putih Hospital include improvements in facilities and infrastructure, increased competency and insight into PMKP programs, increased hospital staf awareness and discipline, communication and coordination of PMKP programs and fulfillment of an integrated data management.
Backgrounds: The development of information technology in the health care, one of which is electronic medical record. Previous research said that the physical record is more complete compared to electronic medical records (92.4% vs 72.6% with < 0.001). It needs to be analyzed especially in critical units, such as Intensive Care Unit (ICU) which monitoring, evaluation and recording is done periodically and continuously every hour. Subject and Methods: This research used descriptive and quantitative methods with a cross sectional approach. Descriptive data gotten from medical records with total 40 inpatients in Intensive Care Yarsi Hospital used. While qualitative data was gotten from in depth interviews. Results: result of filling monitoring in EMR 71.87%, accuracy 62.5%, timeliness 87.5% and according to the law 85%. Conclusions: The effectiveness of electronic medical record in ICU has not been in accordance with 100% quality indicator
