Ditemukan 40303 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
This Health Risk Assessment (HRA) research that was held at Floating Storageand Offloading (FSO) PT.X in 2012, is based on process working area. HealthRisk Assessment was conducted by analyzing Potensial Risk (PR), IntrinsicGravity Rate (G), Frequency Rate of Exposure (F), Duration of the exposure orthe repeat rate of exposed task (D), Residual Risk (RR), and Prevention Means(PM) value that came from every job activity. The result will be compared withACGIH TLV's 2011 and Peraturan Menteri Tenaga Kerja (Kepmenaker No.13/Men/X/2011). The design of this study is cross sectional by conductingobservation, measurment, and data gathering. The result of this study showed thatheath risk level are very high (very critical) on Main Deck (Noise, Asbestos,Paederus littoralis), Main Floor, Lower Engine Flat, Upper Engine Flat (Noiseand Asbestos) in the PT.X work area.Keywords:Health Risk Assessment (HRA), FSO, Potensial Risk (PR), Intrinsic Gravity Rate(G), Frequency Rate of Exposure (F), Duration of the exposure or the repeat rateof exposed task (D), Residual Risk (RR), Prevention Means (PM).
Abstrak
Fasilitas-fasilitas yang ada di industri minyak dan gas bumi tergolong berisiko tinggi dikarenakan bahan yang dikelola adalah minyak dan gas mudah terbakar dan mudah meledak baik secara intern maupun dengan proses luar.
PT X adalah sebuah perusahan minyak dan gas bumi yang beroperasi di lepas pantai (offshore) sebagai pengguna FSO dengan kapasitas 660.000 barrel oil. FSO tersebut sudah mulai dioperasikan pada bulan Agustus 2012 tetapi belum memiliki hasil analisis risiko yang cukup untuk aktifitas yang ada dalam FSO tersebut. Kondisi ini sangat berbahaya karena FSO adalah suatu instalasi dengan risiko sangat tinggi terhadap ledakan/kebakaran, kecelakaan fatal dan saat ini perusahaan tidak mempunyai informasi yang cukup apakah peralatan atau sistem pencegahan bahaya sudah sesuai dengan kebutuhan atau tidak.
Tujuan penelitian secara umum untuk mengetahui jenis risiko dan tingkat risiko keselamatan kerja yang potensial terjadi pada aktifitas di ruang pompa dan pengendaliannya dan tujuan penelitian secara khusus untuk mengetahui jenis-jenis aktifitas apa saja yang dilakukan di ruang pompa FSO PT X, mengetahui jenis-jenis bahaya/ risiko yang ada di ruang pompa, mengetahui tingkat risiko yang ada dari setiap aktifitas yang ada di ruang pompa dan mengetahui pengendalian apa saja yang sudah ada dan yang masih diperlukan untuk meminimalkan risiko yang ada di setiap aktifitas di ruang pompa. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis risiko keselamatan kerja pada proses yang dilakukan di ruang pompa di FSO PT X.
Penelitian dilakukan dengan observasi lapangan, diskusi dengan pekerja FSO dan PT. X, juga analisa data yang dimiliki oleh PT X. Waktu penelitian dilakukan pada bulan Januari sampai dengan April 2013.
Penelitian merupakan jenis penelitian deskriptif kualitatif, dimana dilakukan penilaian terhadap risiko yang dimiliki oleh pekerja dengan mengkombinasikan inspeksi dilapangan dengan teknik penilaian risiko. Penilaian risiko dilakukan dengan tahapan manajemen risiko sesuai dengan Risk Management AS/ NZS 4360:1999/2004.
Hasil Penelitian Aktifitas yang ada di ruang pompa adalah turun naik tangga, pengoperasian pompa kargo, perawatan pompa kargo, pembersihan bilge ruang pompa, memasuki ruang pompa, pengecatan di ruang pompa, pekerjaan pada ketinggian, dan kondisi peralatan di ruang pompa.
Risiko tertinggi dari semua aktifitas adalah pada aktifitas pengoperasian pompa kargo dimana risiko setelah kontrol masih ditingkat risiko Tinggi hal ini terjadi karena karena pekerjaan dilakukan dengan mengaktifkan pompa sehingga timbul panas, bising, asap yang sangat mengganggu aktifitas dan konsentrasi pekerja. Risiko terendah dari semua aktifitas adalah aktifitas pengecatan di ruang pompa dengan tingkat risiko satu Sedang dan dua Rendah.
Pengendalian risiko yang telah dilakukan adalah penerapan prosedur melalui instruksi kerja, Permit to work, pembuatan kemiringan tangga yang tidak lebih dari 60 derajat, penerangan yang cukup, penggunaan alat pelindung diri seperti coverall, masker, safety shoes, handglove, safety glasses, ear plug, ventilasi udara, pemberlakukan jadwal kerja yang bergantian, pemasangan peredam panas pada bagian-bagian panas tinggi, pembuatan jalur pekerja, pengecekan kandungan gas yang ada di ruang pompa, pekerja yang mengetahui tata letak peralatan di ruang pompa dan memastikan pekerja yang bekerja adalah sehat, pemeriksaan rutin peralatan angkat secara rutin seperti body harness, chain block, wire sling, konstruksi penyangga chain block.
Existing facilities in the oil and gas industries was generally classified as high risk due to substance oil and gas is flammable and explosive with both internal and external processes.
PT. X is an oil and gas company operating in the offshore as an FSO users with capacity 660,000 barrels of oil. The FSO was started in August 2012 but has not had sufficient risk analysis for existing activities in the FSO. This condition is very dangerous because the FSO is a plant with a very high risk for explosions / fires, fatal accidents and the company currently does not have sufficient information whether equipment or hazard prevention systems are in accordance with the requirements or not.
General research purposes to determine the type and level of risk potential safety risks occur in activities in the pump room and its control and objective study specifically to determine what types of activities are carried out in a pump room FSO PT X, knowing the types of hazards / risks that exist in the pump room, knowing that there is the risk level of any activity that is in control of the pump room and find out what is already there and are still required to minimize the risks involved in each activity in the pump room.
This study was conducted to analyze safety risks on the process undertaken in the pump room at the FSO PT X.. Research carried out by field observations, discussions with workers FSO and PT. X, as well as analysis of data owned by PT X. The study was conducted in January to April 2013.
Research is a qualitative descriptive, which made an assessment of the risk to workers by combining field inspection with risk assessment techniques. Risk assessment carried out by stages in accordance with the Risk Management AS / NZS 4360:1999 / 2004.
The activities are there in the pump room is down and up stairs, the operation of cargo pumps, cargo pump maintenance, cleaning bilge pump room, inspection to pump chamber, the painting in the pump room, work at height, and condition of the equipment in the pump room.
Highest risk of all activities is the operation of cargo pump activity which after controls the level of risk still High this happens because as the work is done by activating the pump so that the resulting heat, noise, smoke highly disrupt the activity and concentration of workers. The lowest risk of all activity is the activity of painting in the pump room with a Medium risk level and two Low.
Control risk is the application procedure has been carried out through the work instructions, permit to work, making the slope of the stairs which no more than 60 degrees, adequate lighting, the use of personal protective equipment such as coveralls, masks, safety shoes, handglove, safety glasses, ear plugs, air vents, the sift work schedule, installation of heat shock on high heat parts, installs line workers, checking the gas content in the pump room, workers who know the location of equipment in the pump room and ensure workers are healthy, regular test lifting equipment such as body harness, chain block, wire slings, chain block buffer construction.
This thesis discussed the potential and risks of fire on workers in the offshore platform oil and gas production caused by hydrocarbons hazard by identifying those hazard. Hazard calculation was conducted in order to find out the specific location which has potential risk, then calculated individual risk per annum (IRPA) surveillance followed by the final results of the Potential Loss of Live (PLL). These results compared to criteria or standards and determine the position of workers was in ALARP condition or not. This research was a quantitative risk assessment with descriptive design. The results of this study gave recommendation to company for maintain programs and activities that always prevent fires even though the CB platform is within the acceptable region. Alert to the hazard of hydrocarbons, increased awareness of workers at workplace, checking and monitor hazards, and always follow working procedure.
The risk of accidents and health problems in crew fatigue has a huge impact if a crew made thewrong decision to steer the ship or give orders to the other crew members. Various studies andcase reports prove fatigue on seafarers still a lot going on. This study analyzed the risk factors forwork-related fatigue and fatigue risk factors unrelated to the work crew a floating crane in theoperational area PT.X. To determine the fatigue of seafarers using the Subjective SeafarerFatigue Questionnaire. The case studies conducted in PT. X. This study used a cross-sectionalstudy design is used to determine the relationship between the dependent and independentvariables and studied simultaneously in one time. Researchers used a questionnaire instrumentand collect data on the entire crew a floating crane. From the research that the ship crew fatigueat work, tiredness on the type of vessel floating crane conveyor is greater than non conveyor,sleep quantity factor is the biggest factor has a chance of risk of fatigue. Conclusions onresearch, work-related factors, namely the working time, sleep for a while no significantrelationship with fatigue. The length of time was in significant relation with fatigue. Factorsunrelated work such as quantity of sleep, smoking habits, exercise habits there is a significantrelationship with the risk of fatigue, sleep quality is not significant relationship with the risk offatigue.Keywords: Fatigue, crew boats.
This Health Risk Assessment research that was implemented at PT X North Operations Area. The aims of this study was to review the data on personal dose exposure measurement results for 1 measurement period 2015 - 2017 nd conduct a health risk assessment using a semi-quantitative analysis method with reference to the IPIECA & OGP Risk Assessment Matrix Year 2006. The results of this study identified 9 SEGs, but after being studied quantitatively there were SEGs that needed to be classified into several sub-groups and health hazards only referred to secondary documents as many as 10 health hazards. There is a variety of personal dose measurement results in 1 SEG showing one of the weaknesses in the classification of SEG which only refers to job title. The Residual Risk Level in each SEG for all gas hazards (Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene) is at a low risk level, except for H2S which is in the medium risk category. Meanwhile, noise is classified as low risk in SEG GS Operators, MWT Operators, Gas Operators, Welder, Company Representatives and noise is a medium risk in several SEG Technician shops, especially during metalizing work. The H2S risk level cannot be lowered to low considering that the severity level is at a high level (4). Reducing the risk level of noise hazards can be implemented by consistent implementation of HCP and it is necessary to measure the effectiveness of the earmuff / earplugs function to determine the effective dose received by workers. Health risks at the Low Risk level must still be managed so that the risk level does not increase so that PT X continues to implement existing controls and ensure the implementation a comprehensive HRA study by conducting observations / interviews to determine the effectiveness of implementing existing controls on the Potential Risk Level and Residual Risk Level
