Ditemukan 23610 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Tesis ini membahas perbedaan variabel penilaian kinerja tehnis keperawatan dalam Instrumen Keperawatan Rumah Sakit 'X' dengan Elemen Penilaian Standar Akreditasi Rumah Sakit KARS tahun 2011 karena adanya perubahan Sistem Akreditasi Rumah Sakit dari sistem akreditasi berorientasi input and dokumentasi menjadi sistem akreditasi berorientasi proses dan pasien Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menemukan persamaan dan perbedaan variabel dan elemen penilaian untuk kemudian dianalisa dan dirumuskan menjadi sebuah insrumen penilaian kinerja tehnis keperawatan adaptasi dari instrumen penilaian kinerja tehnis yang saat ini digunakan oleh Rumah Sakit 'X' sehingga sesuai dengan elemen penilaian Standar Akreditasi Rumah Sakit KARS tahun 2011 Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa terdapat sebanyak 28 variabel Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Keperawatan Rumah Sakit 'X rsquo yang sudah sesuai dengan elemen penilaian Standar Akreditasi Rumah Sakit KARS tahun 2011 40 variabel Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Keperawatan Rumah Sakit 'X rsquo masih berbeda dengan Elemen Penilaian Standar Akreditasi Rumah Sakit KARS tahun 2011 dan akan dimasukkan kedalam draft revisi Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Rumah Sakit 'X' serta 2 variabel dalam Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Keperawatan Rumah Sakit 'X rsquo akan dimasukkan kedalam draft revisi Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Rumah Sakit walau tidak terdapat dalam elemen penilaian Standar Akreditasi Rumah Sakit KARS tahun 2011.
This Thesis discuss the variable difference between nursing technical performance appraisal instrument of Hospital 'X' dan KARS Hospital Accreditation of 2011 due to a change of standard within the Hospital Accreditation System from input and document oriented system into a process and patient oriented system The goal of this research is to find the similarities dan differences between Nursing Technical Performance Appraisal Instrument of Haspital 'X' dan KARS Hospital Accreditation of 2011 to then be analyzed and be made into a draft for Hospital 'X' Nursing Appraisal Instrument revision so that the current Nursing Appraisal Instrument template still can be used with a revision to accomodate KARS Hospital Accreditation of 2011 This research is a qualitative research with a descriptive design The research show a similarities of 28 variables and a difference of 40 variabels between nursing technical performance appraisal instrument of Haspital 'X' dan KARS Hospital Accreditation of 2011 In addition there are 2 more variables derived from the current nursing technical performance appraisal instrument of Hospital 'X' that have no similarities with KARS Hospital Accreditation of 2011 which will be made into a draft for Hospital 'X' Nursing Appraisal Instrument revision.
Metode penelitian menggunakan desain potong lintang, dengan pendekatan kuantitatif, data primer didapatkan dengan menyebarkan kuesioner kepada seluruh tenaga keperawatan di RSIA Assalam. Total sampel 56 sama dengan populasi, dengan analisis multivariat menggunakan regresi logistik.
Hasil analisis bivariat variabel terukur, relevan, hasil kerja berhubungan secara signifikan (p<0,05) dengan penilaian kinerja. Perilaku paling dominan terhadap penilaian kinerja dengan hasil analisis multivariat ukuran kinerja perilaku (p=0.0001) dan indikator jelas (p=0.039).
Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini indikator kinerja yang digunakan sudah jelas tapi kurang terukur, kurang relevan dan kurang terikat waktu. Instrumen yang digunakan dapat mengukur perilaku dengan baik, tapi belum dapat mengukur hasil kerja dan kompetensi dengan baik. Perbaikan indikator kinerja dan ukuran kinerja pada instrumen penilaian kinerja perlu dilakukan demi meningkatkan kinerja tenaga keparawatan
Goals Hospitals in providing public health services should be able to maintain quality of services. One of the government's efforts to improve the quality of home services through accreditation, which is compulsory and required by government regulation. This study focus on two goals of Prima Medika Hospital in preparation of KARS 2012 accreditation: International Patient Safety Goals and Millennium Development Goals. The purpose of this study is to determine the stages, problems and monitoring in the preparation process of accreditation on the patient's safety goals and the Millennium Development Goals. This research uses qualitative method by involving 7 participants working group of accreditation. Data collected by in-depth interview technique and document tracing, then analyzed using content analysis. The results of the interviews show that the preparation phase begins with the commitment of all hospitals, the accreditation working group established by the director, the compilation of documents of the assessment elements according to the accreditation standards, program dissemination to medical and non-medical staff, then the implementation. The next stage are monitoring and evaluation, through monev report, quality indicator and field inspection. In conclusions, the very important stages in preparation process are: commitment from all level of hospital, approaches to the specialist doctors formally or informally, more internal training. Keywords: preparation, accreditation, international patient safety, Millennium Development Goals
Kata kunci: Akreditasi Rumah Sakit, keselamatan pasien.
Hospital Accreditation Standards is an assessment for hospitals to implementpatient safety programs in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister ofHealth No. 1691 of 2011. Hospital X wasnot yet fully implementing patient safetybased on the Hospital Accreditation 2012.Descriptive research with quantitative method continued by qualitative methodwas implemented to study the preparation of Hospital X which will undergoAccreditation in 2016.The research also developed questionnaire on Patient Safety based on TheHospital Accreditation 2012. Reliability test was done with the result of that 47out of 65 questionnaires were reliable. The research found 17 points of TheHospital Accreditation 2012 still need improvement in implementation at HospitalX.
Keywords: Hospitals Accreditation, patient safety.
Hospital accreditation is official recognition from the government to hospitals that have met standards of health services, hospitals themselves have passed the accreditation Zahirah but based on existing performance data were deemed to be less so the nurse needs to know the relationship between knowledge about the accreditation of hospitals and nursing performance characteristics Zahirah hospital in Jakarta in 2010.
Measurement of hospital performance can provide a strong foundation for solving existing problems and is needed to improve the quality of care service. This thesis assesses the quality performance of hospital organization using Malcolm Baldrige for Performance Excellence based on seven criteria: Leadership, Strategy Planning, Costumers Focus, Measurement, Analysis and Management Knowledge, Work Focus, Operation Focus and Result. This research is based on a qualitative research by collecting information about organizational performance through in-depth interviews, observation, document review, and focus group discussion. Based on the results of the study, in each criteria also elaborated opportunities for improvement that can be done by the hospital to improve the quality performance of the organization.
ABSTRAK
Dalam rangka meningktakan mutu pelayanan kesehatan, kualitas dari masingmasingsumber daya manusia menjadi fokus perhatian departemen SDM RumahSakit Gigi dan Mulut (RSGM) Universitas Trisakti. Salah satu strategi untukmeningkatkan kualitas SDM adalah melalui mekanisme penilaian kinerjakaryawan yang efektif.Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mendapatkan gambaran sistem penilaian kinerja diRSGM Universitas Trisakti saat ini dan membuat usulan sistem penilaian kinerjayang baru berdasarkan hasil yang diperoleh. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodekualitatif yang terbagi menjadi dua tahap penelitian. Tahap pertama bertujuanuntuk melihat efektifitas sistem penilaian kinerja lama yang menggunakan DP3.Data diperoleh dari wawancara mendalam dan diskusi kelompok terarah denganinforman berjunlah 10 orang yang terdiri dari 3 orang pimpinan dan 7 orang staf.Selanjutnya tahap kedua bertujuan untuk mengembangkan suatu rancangan sistempenilaian kinerja yang baru. Hasilnya kemudian didiskusikan bersama denganpimpinan RSGM dalam diskusi kelompok terarah.Hasil penelitian yang didapat pada tahap pertama melalui wawancara mendalamdan diskusi kelompok terarah, terlihat bahwa informan dari lini karyawan secaraumum tidak mengetahui dengan jelas mengenai pelaksanaan sistem penilaiankinerja yang dilaksanakan di RSGM. Oleh karena itu, mereka berpendapat bahwasistem penilaian kinerja saat ini belum memiliki relevansi, sensitifitas, tingkatpenerimaan, keandalan dan kepraktisan yang cukup dalam menggambarkankinerja karyawan. Selanjutnya pada tahap kedua, dikembangkan suatu usulansistem penilaian kinerja yang baru berdasarkan konsep efektifitas Cascio denganmamadukan hasil yang didapat dari penelitian tahap pertama, aspek penilaianpada instrumen DP3, kondisi lingkungan pekerjaan di RSGM serta konseppenelitian terdahulu yang sejenis. Setelah hasil diskusi kelompok terarah bersamapimpinan dirangkum, maka didapatkan suatu rancangan pengembangan sistempenilaian kinerja yang baru bagi RSGM Universitas Trisakti. Rancanganpengembangan ini meliputi penilai, instrumen penilaian, prosedur penilaian,kriteria penilaian, waktu pelaksanaan dan manfaat penilaian yang sudahdisesuaikan dengan kondisi lingkunagn RSGM. Dengan diterapkannya rancangansistem penilaian kinerja yang baru ini, diharapkan dapat memotivasi karyawanuntuk bekerja lebih baik dan membantu dalam pengambilan keputusan manajerial.
ABSTRACT
In increasing the quality of health care, quality from individual human resourcesbecome the focus of attention of human resources department of TrisaktiUniversity Oral and Dental Hospital (RSGM). One strategy to increase the humanresources quality is through the effective mechanism of performance appraisalsystem of the employment.The goal of this study is to get the current image of performance appraisal systemin Trisakti University's RSGM and make proposal for new performance appraisalsystem based on the result. First stage is to see the efficacy of previousperformance appraisal system that using DP3. Data is collected from in depthinterview and focus group discussion with a total of 10 informants that consist of3 leaders and 7 staff. The next stage is to develop new framework for performanceappraisal system. The result then discussed with the RSGM's leaders in focusgroup discussion.The result from first stage is collected from in depth interview and focus groupdiscussion, it seems that the informant from employer group in general was notclearly know about the performance appraisal system that been carried out by theRSGM. Therefore, their opinions are the performance appraisal system until nowdoesn't have relevance, sensitivity, the level of acceptance, reliability, andpracticality that deep enough to describe the employer's work. Next on the secondstage, a proposal of new performance appraisal system is developed base onCascio's efficacy concept in concert with the first stage's result, assessment aspectin DP3 instrument, work condition in RSGM as well as previous study, thus anew framework for development of new performance appraisal system TrisaktiUniversity RSGM is made. Development of this framework consist of person whoassess the system, assessment criteria, time of assessment, and the benefit ofassessment that has been adjusted with the condition in RSGM. By applying thisnewly proposed performance appraisal system, hopefully it can motivated theemployer to work better and helps in managerial decision making.
The hospital as an advanced health facility is expected to provide complete services. In the process it is in line with the objectives of Hospital Accreditation in order to get quality recognition and prioritize Patient Safety. The purpose of this study was to determine the readiness to fulfill Infection Prevention and Control standards according to SNARS first edition in Mitra Jambi Hospital in terms of problem solving cycle. The research method used is qualitative research where the data collection is done by in- depth interviews and document review. The research results show that in terms of input to human resources, facilities and infrastructure, budgeting and instruments have been maximized despite various limitations and conditions of hospitals that are still operating. In terms of the process for fulfilling human resources qualifications, it is sufficient even though training on training is still minimal and limited to internal training or comparative studies to other hospitals. Procurement of infrastructure is also still using priority directly related to services such as the procurement of hand rubs and hand soap hand washing programs and Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD) units, laundry and nutrition for equipment and rooms that comply with Infection Prevention and Control standards. Financing is still constrained due to the limited availability of funds but can be optimized. The implementation of the instrument which includes monitoring evaluation is considered to be still not maximal but has gone well. As an output, the achievement of meeting Infection Prevention and Control standards through self-assessment from all parts of the input is considered sufficient and able to deal with the hospital accreditation process. In conclusion, the readiness of human resources, infrastructure, policies/ regulations, budgeting as well as the PPI Standard instruments have been largely fulfilled and are ready to face hospital accreditation surveys. Suggestion to Infection Prevention and Control Committee and Infection Prevention and Control Nurse (IPCN), Nurse Department, Hospital Management and also Accreditation Team to continuous coordination each other to achieve feedback, regularly socialization for educational of Infection Prevention and Control standard to staff and also patient with their family, goals to maintain and increasing hospital quality thorough Infection Prevention and Control.
