Ditemukan 9 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Kata kunci: AS/NZS ISO 31000 : 2009, manajemen risiko, penilaian risiko, tingkat risiko.
This study discusses about the risk analysis of occupational health and safety in the working process Die Casting Plan 3 PT. X in May-June 2016. This study used a descriptive research design with AS / NZS ISO 31000: 2009 as standard for the risk assessment process of occupational health and safety. The method used in the risk assessment is a semi-quantitative mathematical formula W. T Fine. Risk identification method in this study adopted by Job Hazard Analysis (JHA). The purpose of this study was to determine the risk level of occupational health and safety in the working process Die Casting. The results showed that found as many as 58 risks in the working process Die Casting. where the initial risk assessment (basic risk) as much as 48.27% of risk with a very high level, 24.14% of risk with substantial risk level, 18.97% of risk with risk priority level 3, and 8.62% risk risk level priority 1. Then these risks reassessed taking into account the existing controls (existing risk) to 46.55% of risk with risk priority level 3, 24.13% of risk with substantial risk level, 13.80% risk risk priority level 1, 8.62% of risk with a very high level of risk, and 6.90% to the level of risk acceptable risk. While on the fourth working process Die Casting, there are 5 biggest risk to the level of risk that is not acceptable, is very high, priority 1 and substantial. Therefore, given advice on the control of the 5 biggest risks of each process that is engineering controls, administrative controls or personal protective control.
Keyword: AS / NZS ISO 31000: 2009, risk management, risk assessment, risk levels.
Kata kunci :ISO 31000, penilaian risiko, kemungkinan, pemajanan, konsekuensi, tingkatrisiko
SMEs workers are exposed to significant risk due to improper implementation atrisk management. This study aimed to evaluate the risk level at two tekstile SMEsby using risk assessment method developed by W.T Fine. It was found that veryhigh risk was associated with safety hazard (electricity) ; ergonomic hazard(handling) ; chemical hazard (fume exposure). Priority 1 risk was associated withmechanical hazard (seewing) ; physical hazard (temperature). Substantial risk wasassociated with chemical hazard (dust ; solvent) ; gravity hazard (struck down)physical hazard (lightning exposure). Priority 3 was associated with safety hazard(work area) ; work organization hazard (work stress). Acceptable risk wasassociated with mechanical hazard (scissoring ; ironing) ; physical hazard (gastube).
Key word :ISO 31000, risk assessment, probability, exposure, consequences, risk level.
Paparan terhadap bahan kimia dan faktor fisika di lingkungan kerja manufaktur herbisida berpotensi menimbulkan risiko kesehatan serius jika tidak dilakukan pengendalian secara sistematis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan Health Risk Assessment (HRA) terhadap bahaya kimia dan fisika yang dihadapi oleh pekerja di area produksi, packaging, dan gudang pada industri manufaktur herbisida, dengan pendekatan berbasis Similar Exposure Group (SEG). Metode yang digunakan mengacu pada kerangka kerja ISO 31000:2018 dan praktik rekomendasi HRA dari otoritas internasional. Data diperoleh melalui dokumen pemantauan lingkungan kerja, SDS, OHSERA, dan wawancara dengan pemangku kepentingan. Risiko dinilai menggunakan matriks semi-kuantitatif berdasarkan skor likelihood dan severity, dengan validasi keparahan kesehatan merujuk pada referensi seperti ACGIH dan literatur ilmiah terkini. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa SEG Proses menghadapi risiko tinggi dari paparan Monoisopropylamine (MIPA) dan Kalium Hidroksida (KOH), sedangkan SEG Packaging dan Warehouse memiliki risiko signifikan akibat kebisingan, getaran, panas, serta uap bahan kimia volatil. Evaluasi existing control menunjukkan pengendalian belum optimal dalam menurunkan risiko ke tingkat rendah. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penguatan pengendalian teknis dan administratif, seperti ventilasi lokal, rotasi kerja, penggunaan alat pelindung diri yang sesuai, serta pengaturan waktu kerja-istirahat, diperlukan untuk menurunkan risiko residual. Penilaian risiko berbasis SEG terbukti efektif dalam memetakan prioritas pengendalian dan memberikan dasar yang kuat untuk pengambilan keputusan K3 di industri sejenis.
Exposure to chemical agents and physical hazards in herbicide manufacturing environments poses serious health risks if not managed systematically. This study aims to conduct a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) of chemical and physical hazards encountered by workers in the production, packaging, and warehouse areas of a herbicide manufacturing industry, using a Similar Exposure Group (SEG) approach. The methodology follows the ISO 31000:2018 risk management framework and international best practices for occupational health risk assessment. Data were obtained through environmental monitoring reports, safety data sheets (SDS), OHSERA records, and interviews with relevant stakeholders. Risks were assessed using a semi-quantitative matrix based on likelihood and severity scores, with health severity validation referring to ACGIH and recent peer-reviewed scientific literature. The findings indicate that the Process SEG faces high risks from exposure to Monoisopropylamine (MIPA) and Potassium Hydroxide (KOH), while the Packaging and Warehouse SEGs are significantly affected by noise, vibration, heat, and volatile chemical vapors. Evaluation of existing controls reveals that current measures are not sufficiently effective in reducing risks to acceptable levels. The study concludes that stronger technical and administrative controls—such as local exhaust ventilation, work rotation, appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and regulated work-rest schedules—are essential to achieve low residual risks. Risk assessment based on SEGs has proven effective in mapping control priorities and provides a solid foundation for occupational health and safety decision-making in similar industrial settings.
This research evaluate the safety and health risk at the Semut-Semut Natural schoolfacility or activitiy. Design for this research was descriptive qualitative observationstudy that objective to determine its the level of risk. Risk Assesment based onAS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 standard using qualitative method and Hazard Identificationand Risk Assesment (HIRA). Then risk evaluated what its risk acceptable or neededto preventing. The result of this research showed that the level of risk is very highlevel risk, medium risk and low risk. The effort to control the risk gave somerecommendation with substitution, enginering, administration and personal protectiveequipment.Keyword :Semut-Semut The Natural School, Risk Assesment, Level of risk, Risk Evaluation,AS/NZS ISO 31000 : 2009 standard
