Ditemukan 40677 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan karakteristik sikap (personality) yang dimiliki oleh pimpinan kurang optimal pada karakteristik ketahanan emosi, bersikap terbuka, berorientasi pada pembelajaran dan sikap berhati-hati. Karakteristik gaya kepemimpinan transformasional pada pimpinan kurang optimal pada karakteristik ikut terlibat. Karakteristik praktik terbaik yang dimiliki oleh para pimpinan masih kurang optimal pada karakteristik tanggung jawab. Untuk meningkatkan karakteristik safety leadership, maka perlu adanya pelatihan ulang mengenai safety leadership bagi para pimpinan untuk menyegarkan kembali pemahaman yang kurang optimal tentang safety leadership, mengkaji ulang job description yang ada dan mengembangkan Job description safety leadership yang lebih terukur dan penilaian atau audit safety leadership di departemen drilling PT. X.
Geothermal, oil and gas drilling are known as projects with high work risks and require high costs. Several studies strongly indicate that safety leadership management influences the success of behavioral safety processes. The leadership role in the Drilling department in working on drilling projects will be one of the benchmarks of success related to positive safety outcomes. This study is a qualitative method approach to analyze three factors that influence safety leadership, namely personality, transformational leadership style, and best practices in the position of Head and Assistant Head. Data was collected in April-July 2020 in the Drilling department of PT. X through in-depth interviews, document review and observation.
The results showed the characteristics of personality possessed by the leader is less than optimal on the characteristics of emotional resilience, extroversion, learning orientation and conscientiousness. The characteristics of transformational leadership styles are less than optimal on the characteristics of Engaging. Characteristics of best practices are still not optimal in terms of accountability characteristics. To improve the characteristics of safety leadership, it is necessary to have retraining on safety leadership for leaders to refresh the suboptimal understanding of safety leadership, review existing job descriptions and develop a more measured Job description of safety leadership and an assessment or audit of safety leadership in drilling department of PT. X.
ABSTRAK Nama : Alfina Hapsari Program Studi : Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Judul : Analisis Safety Leadership Pada Posisi Unit Pelaksana, Unit Pengelolaan Konstruksi, Pimpinan Proyek, Pimpinan Divisi, dan Pimpinan Departemen Operasi Proyek Infrastruktur di PT.X (Kontraktor Konstruksi) Tahun 2018 Pembimbing : Dadan Erwandi, S.Psi., M.Psi Industri jasa konstruksi memiliki resiko kecelakaan kerja yang tinggi. Sepanjang Agustus 2017 hingga Februari 2018, telah terjadi tiga belas kecelakaan konstruksi dengan tiga kasus fatality accident pada proyek pekerjaan jalan tol dan jalan rel di Indonesia. Safety leadership merupakan salah satu komponen penting dalam meningkatkan kinerja Kesehatan, Keselamatan, Keamanan dan Lingkungan (K3L). Penelitian ini mengkaji safety leadership model pada posisi pimpinan di proyek dan departemen operasi proyek infrastruktur PT X yang bergerak di bidang kontraktor konstruksi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan metode kuantitatif berdasarkan dua variabel utama dari safety leadership, yaitu leadership style (transformational leadership) dan best practices. Data penelitian didapatkan dari kuesioner dan wawancara pada subyek penelitian serta observasi mengenai penerapan K3L di lokasi proyek PT X pada bulan April – Mei 2018. Dari hasil penelitian didapatkan bahwa safety leadership masih kurang menonjol kecuali pada posisi General Manager. Hal ini dikarenakan kurangnya pemahaman mengenai kebijakan K3L, kurangnya komunikasi, lemahnya konsistensi dan komitmen penerapan K3L, serta kurangnya tindakan proaktif dan inisiatif saat menghadapi masalah K3L. Hal yang dapat diterapkan untuk meningkatkan safety leadership tersebut antara lain dengan menyusun dan melaksanakan program pelatihan safety leadership bagi semua level pimpinan serta menjaga monitoring pelaksanaan program K3L di tempat kerja. Kata kunci: Safety Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Best Practices, K3L
ABSTRACT Name : Alfina Hapsari Study Program : Occupational Health and Safety Title : Safety Leadership Analysis in The Position of Implementation Unit, Construction Management Unit, Project Manager, Division Manager, and Operation Department Manager of Infrastructure Project at PT.X (Construction Contractor) in 2018 Consellor : Dadan Erwandi, S.Psi., M.Psi. The construction industry has a high risk of occupational injury. Throughout August 2017 to February 2018, there had been thirteen construction accidents with three cases of fatality accidents in toll road and rail road projects in Indonesia. Safety Leadership is one of the important components in improving Safety, Health and Environment (SHE) performance. This study examines Safety Leadership Model at the lead position in the project and the operations department of the infrastructure project at PT X as a Construction Contractor Company. This study was a descriptive research with quantitative method based on two main variables of Safety Leadership, those are Leadership Style and Best Practice. Research data obtained from questionnaires, interviews, and observations on the application of SHE at PT X’s project location in April - May 2018. This research obtained that Safety Leadership is still weak except The General Manager. This is due to lacks of understanding of SHE policies, communication, consistency and commitment to the implementation of SHE, proactive and initiative action when facing SHE issues. This suggests that company should improve by preparing and implementing Safety Leadership training program for all manager levels as well as maintaining the monitoring of SHE program implementation in the workplace. Keywords: Safety Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Best Practices, SHE
ABSTRAK Tesis ini membahas karakteristik dan profil dari safety leadership (SL) pada posisi Supervisor, Foreman dan Leadman pada pada projek MHBL di PT. AD yang merupakan tambang batubara. Selain penilaian dilakukan dari sisi supervisor, foreman dan leadman, juga dilakukan penilaian dari sisi operator yang dipimpin langsung oleh ketiga posisi manajemen lini tersebut.Penelitian ini adalah penelitian semi kuantitatif dengan desian deskriptif, dimana objek penelitian terdiri dari 4 posisi: supervisor, foreman, leadman dan operator. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan teori dari Thomas Krause (2005) mengenai safety leadership yang dipengaruhi oleh 4 faktor: Personality, Transformational Leadership Style, Best Practices dan Organizational Culture. Peneliti hanya menggunakan 3 variabel pertama sebagai konsep penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa supervisor, foreman dan leadman menunjukkan hasil yang belum optimal dalam pemenuhan safety leadership di tempat kerja.Sedangkan hasil penilaian operator terhadap safety leadership supervisor, foreman dan leadman di tempat kerja menunjukkan hasil yang baik pada variabel transformational leadership dan best practices, namun pada variabel personality belum memenuhi kriteria safety leadership.
ABSTRACT This research discussed the characteristic and profile of Safety Leadership in job position of Supervisor, Foreman and Leadman in MHBL project at PT. AD which is the second largest coal producer in Indonesia. The evaluation also conducted on operator/ tradesman level which directly supervise within those three levels of frontline management.It?s a semi quantitative research with descriptive design, in which the research objects are four job positions: supervisor, foreman, leadman and operator. The approach being used in this Thesis is Thomas Krause?s theory (2005) of Safety Leadership, which influenced by four factors: Personality, Transformational Leadership Style, Best Practices and Organizational Culture. Researcher took three variables and excludes the organizational culture, as the concept of the research.The result shows that supervisor, foreman and leadman has not fulfil the criteria of safety leadership in their workplace, while the evaluation form operator shown that their supervisor, foreman and leadman already fill the transformational leadership and best practices criteria, although the personality criteria hasn?t fully achieved in safety leadership.
Leadership is one of the important factors in safety culture to achieve good safety performance. Leaders who have high concerns in safety will be able to direct their team members by influencing their behavior to achieve corporate safety goals. This thesis discusses the characteristics profile of safety leadership at the Supervisor of production division at PT. A. This research is a qualitative research that will describe the characteristics profile of safety leadership in the Supervisor of production division at PT. A in 2017 by conducting in-depth interviews and direct observation of the characteristics of safety leadership. There are 6 characteristics of safety leadership used in this research: commitment to safety, safety accountability, safety communication, safety role model, safety involvement, and recognition and feedback in K3. From the results of the research, the strength characteristics of supervisors in PT. A is a commitment to safety, safety communication, and able to be role model in safety. The weak characteristics are safety accountability, involvement in safety initiatives, and safety recognition and feedback. Keywords: Safety Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership
Kata Kunci:MSDs, keluhan gejala MSDs, ROSA
This study aims to analyze approprietness of work posture, work equipment, and workstationthat cause the symptoms of MSDs complaints of computer users Head Office PT X. Designstudy is cross sectional. All of the data collected in these study are derived from primary data ofobservation results in the form of workm posture, work equipment, and workstation. The resultsstudy showed there were discrepancies in some of work posture while work, work equipmentused, and workstation. The results of the symptoms MSDs complaints use ROSA methodsshowed variying results, that are the ROSA final score 1-4 (further assessment not immediatelyrequired) and 5-10 (further assessment required as soon as possible). The observation resluts ofthe symptoms MSDs complaints showed 92 (87%) of respondents feel there are complaints atone area of the body. Many areas of the body most complaints are upper neck (67%), lumbar(62%), and lower neck (53%). It is recommended to make adjustments of work equipment byworkers, doing stretching on the side lines job, and socialization importance of ergonomics toworkers.
Key words:MSDs, symptoms of MSDs complaints, ROSA