Ditemukan 33286 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
The hospital as an advanced health facility is expected to provide complete services. In the process it is in line with the objectives of Hospital Accreditation in order to get quality recognition and prioritize Patient Safety. The purpose of this study was to determine the readiness to fulfill Infection Prevention and Control standards according to SNARS first edition in Mitra Jambi Hospital in terms of problem solving cycle. The research method used is qualitative research where the data collection is done by in- depth interviews and document review. The research results show that in terms of input to human resources, facilities and infrastructure, budgeting and instruments have been maximized despite various limitations and conditions of hospitals that are still operating. In terms of the process for fulfilling human resources qualifications, it is sufficient even though training on training is still minimal and limited to internal training or comparative studies to other hospitals. Procurement of infrastructure is also still using priority directly related to services such as the procurement of hand rubs and hand soap hand washing programs and Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD) units, laundry and nutrition for equipment and rooms that comply with Infection Prevention and Control standards. Financing is still constrained due to the limited availability of funds but can be optimized. The implementation of the instrument which includes monitoring evaluation is considered to be still not maximal but has gone well. As an output, the achievement of meeting Infection Prevention and Control standards through self-assessment from all parts of the input is considered sufficient and able to deal with the hospital accreditation process. In conclusion, the readiness of human resources, infrastructure, policies/ regulations, budgeting as well as the PPI Standard instruments have been largely fulfilled and are ready to face hospital accreditation surveys. Suggestion to Infection Prevention and Control Committee and Infection Prevention and Control Nurse (IPCN), Nurse Department, Hospital Management and also Accreditation Team to continuous coordination each other to achieve feedback, regularly socialization for educational of Infection Prevention and Control standard to staff and also patient with their family, goals to maintain and increasing hospital quality thorough Infection Prevention and Control.
Penelitian dalam tesis ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Penelitian menggali informasi dari informan untuk mendapatkan faktor-faktor internal dan eksternal sebagai bahan dasar menyusun strategi. Selanjutnya faktor faktor tersebut dianalisis menggunakan intrumen-instrumen Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE), dan Eksternal factor Evaluation (EVE), matriks I E, matriks TOWS, untuk menghasilkan strategi. Semua pegawai bersemangat melaksanakan kegiatan yang ditetapkan, sumber daya keuangan yang sangat banyak merupakan faktor kekuatan. Akan tetapi, sosialisasi visi dan misi yang belum maksimal, belum menetapkan prioritas program, dan belum melakukan pengukuran mutu dan keselamatan pasien masih menjadi faktor kelemahan RSUD Kepulauan seribu. Faktor peluang RSUD Kepulauan Seribu adalah Lembaga lintas sektor yang mendukung, sedangkan adanya gap kompetensi pegawai RSUD dengan puskesmas yang menghambat pelayanan adalah faktor ancaman yang harus diantisipasi. Skor IFE diperoleh 2,40 sedangkan skor EFE 2,31, sehingga RSUD Kepulauan Seribu berdasarkan matriks I-E berada pada kotak V. Dengan demikian, strategi paling tepat adalah hold dan maintain. RSUD Kepulauan Seribu, berdasarkan matriksTOWS, direkomendasikan melakukan penguatan arah kebijakan organisasi, optimalisasi anggaran, pemanfaatan kerjasama lintas sektor, pemantapan wawasan pegawai, dan penyusunan standar diklat, penyusunan program prioritas, pelaksanaan manajemen risiko, dan pengukuran mutu dan keselamatan pasien
Kata kunci: Akreditasi Rumah Sakit, keselamatan pasien.
Hospital Accreditation Standards is an assessment for hospitals to implementpatient safety programs in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister ofHealth No. 1691 of 2011. Hospital X wasnot yet fully implementing patient safetybased on the Hospital Accreditation 2012.Descriptive research with quantitative method continued by qualitative methodwas implemented to study the preparation of Hospital X which will undergoAccreditation in 2016.The research also developed questionnaire on Patient Safety based on TheHospital Accreditation 2012. Reliability test was done with the result of that 47out of 65 questionnaires were reliable. The research found 17 points of TheHospital Accreditation 2012 still need improvement in implementation at HospitalX.
Keywords: Hospitals Accreditation, patient safety.
Pemanfaatan ketiga indikator (casemix, CMI, dan HBR) secara berkala untuk mempertahankan mutu sembari menjaga efisiensi pelayanan RS di era JKN. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan strategi peningkatan capaian indikator casemix, casemix index dan hospital baserate RSU Bali Royal tahun 2019 - 2024.
Penelitian dilakukan di RSU Bali Royal selama bulan Mei - Juni 2025, menggunakan data primer wawancara mendalam dan focus group discussion dan sekunder yang didapatkan dari rekapitulasi elektronik klaim (e-klaim) Kemenkes, laporan keuangan, dan laporan rumah sakit. Penelitian ini menggunakan studi observasional pendekatan kualitatif untuk menganalisis capaian indikator Casemix, CMI dan HBR rawat inap dan rawat jalan.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat unsur struktur (sumber daya manusia, material, mesin, anggaran, dan metode) dan unsur proses (manajemen pasien, manajemen koding, dan manajemen klaim) membuahkan unsur output (indikator casemix, casemix index, dan hospital baserate) Dinamika penambahan unsur struktur berdampak pada proses pelayanan pasien, efisiensi koding hingga 50%, dan keberhasilan klaim. Casemix rawat jalan tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 11.393; 16.037; 32.763; 59.520; 111.193; dan 129.423. Casemix rawat inap kelas 1 tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 907; 1.321; 2.657; 3.165; 3.829; dan 4.014. Casemix rawat inap kelas 2 tahun 2019-2024 diperoleh 818; 1.013; 1.800; 2.511; 3.052; dan 3.309. Casemix rawat inap keas 3 tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 205; 539; 1.557; 2.023; 2.646; dan 3.038. Nilai CMI rawat jalan tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 0,98; 1,11;1,16; 1,21; 1,35;dan 1,24. CMI rawat inap kelas 1 tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 1,32; 1,60; 1,84; 1,57; 1,45; dan 1,37. CMI rawat inap kelas 2 tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 1,17; 1,36; 1,58; 1,41; 1,33; dam 1,33. CMI rawat inap kelas 3 tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 1,46; 1,82; 1,67; 1,54; 1,53; dan 1,45. HBR rawat jalan tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 354.393; 333.231; 257.536; 243.675; 226.650; dan 238.494. HBR rawat inap kelas 1 tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 5.257.416; 6.028.120; 5.477.120; 5.970.918; 6.542.667; dan 7.082.825. HBR rawat inap kelas 2 tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 4.449.693; 5.628.665; 4.817.066; 4.993.043; 5.156.750; dan 5.563.012. HBR rawat inap kelas 3 tahun 2019 – 2024 diperoleh 3.616.138; 4.594.204; 3.746.071; 4.325.317; 4.584.260; dan 4.789.356. Nilai casemix dan casemix index mengalami peningkatan setiap tahunnya dengan capaian CMI di atas standar rumah sakit swasta kelas C regional 2. HBR rawat jalan pada tahun 2021-2024 dibawah HBR nasional, namun HBR rawat inap kelas 1, 2, dan 3 selalu berada di atas HBR nasional. Strategi yang dapat ditempuh untuk peningkatan casemix, casemix index, dan penurunan HBR adalah optimalisasi unsur struktur dengan perbaikan sumber daya manusia dan pengkajian metode, efisiensi mesin, material, dan anggaran, dan evaluasi pada unsur proses (manajemen pasien, koding, dan klaim).
Background: PPI is one of the chapters in SNARS Edition 1 covering 9 focus areas. Currently, there is no analysis of the achievement of PPI standards based on hospital ownership with secondary data from SNARS Edition 1 in Indonesia. Cross sectional using KARS secondary data. Samples of all accredited hospitals in 2018-2019 were tested based on ownership variables. Results and Discussion: There were 1,271 hospitals with government hospitals (537 hospitals) and private hospitals (734 hospitals). Area 4 focuses on the highest score on regulation of sterilization services, linen management and the lowest score on the guarantee of sterilization and disinfection processes outside of CSSD, evidence of PPI compliance monitoring in third party sterilization services and third party linen management must meet quality certification. Focus Area 8, the highest score on the regulation of the placement of patients with airborne infections, hand hygiene and personal protective equipment and the lowest score on the evidence of IPCN monitoring on the placement of patients with low immunity, on the placement and transfer process of airborne disease patients and hospitals providing negative pressure isolation rooms. Conclusion: The highest value of Focus Area 4 was obtained on the elements of regulation of sterilization services and linen management. The highest value of Focus Area 8 was obtained on the elements of regulation of the placement of patients with airborne infections, hand hygiene, personal protective equipment
Pada era globalisasi saat ini terdapat kecenderungan peningkatan kejadian tidak diharapkan (adverse event). Berdasarkan dari hal tersebut dikembangkan program untuk lebih memperbaiki proses pelayanan yang kemudian dikenal dengan program keselamatan pasien (patient safety). Namun pada kenyataannya ketika tiba pada pengaplikasian program tersebut di lapangan maka rumah sakit akan kembali menemui berbagai masalah. PSBH merupakan suatu pendekatan yang dapat membantu melaksanakan upaya pemecahan masalah yang terjadi di rumah sakit. Sasaran PSBH ada tiga hal yaitu meningkatkan mutu pelayanan, meningkatkan keselamatan pasien (patient safety) serta meningkatkan efisiensi biaya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang mendukung keberhasilan pendekatan PSBH dalam meningkatkan keselamatan pasien di rumah sakit kemudian faktor-faktor tersebut akan dikaitkan dengan teori manajemen, teori kepemimpinan serta teori motivasi. Selain itu juga dilakukan penelitian mengenai kesinambungan kegiatan PSBH di rumah sakit. Penelitian dilakukan di Rumah Sakit Pusat Pertamina dan Rumah Sakit Dr.Sardjito dengan 14 informan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif yaitu wawancara mendalam dan telaah dokumen. Analisis data dilakukan dengan metode analisis isi yaitu membandingkan hasil penelitian dengan teori kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PSBH memiliki perencanaan kegiatan yang terstrukur dan terperinci yang disusun dalam bentuk Plan Of Action. Penyusunan POA ini sesuai dengan teori fungsi manajemen. Tipe kepemimpinan yang mendukung keberhasilan PSBH adalah kepemimpinan yang memberikan kebebasan bagi para anggota timnya untuk mengemukakan pendapat dan menitikberatkan pada diskusi kelompok. Tipe kepemimpinan ini sesuai dengan tipe kepemimpinan demokratis. Faktor pendukung motivasi yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan PSBH adalah karena rasa tanggung jawab yang dimiliki terhadap pasien. Sedangkan kegiatan PSBH sebagian besar telah berhasil disinambungkan di kedua rumah sakit dengan cara melegalkan kegiatan tersebut dalam bentuk SOP. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah pendekatan PSBH tersebut dapat berhasil dikarenakan adanya perencanaan yang jelas dan terstruktur kemudian didukung dengan kepemimpinan yang demokratis dari masing-masing problem solver. Selain itu faktor tanggung jawab terhadap pasien juga mendorong keberhasilan PSBH tersebut. Sedangkan kegiatan PSBH dapat disinambungkan karena kegiatan-kegiatan tersebut dapat dirasakan manfaatnya baik bagi pasien maupun bagai tenaga kesehatan terkait.
In current globalization era theme is tendency of increasing adverse event. Based on that fact a program was developed to fix the services which is known as patient safety program. In reality, when it comes to the application of the program, hospitals will also find some difficulties. PSBH is an approach which can help to resolve a problem in hospitals. There are three aims of PSBH which are increasing the quality of services, increasing patient safety and increasing the cost efficiency in hospitals. The aim of this research is to identify the factors influencing the success of problem solving for better hospitals in increasing patient safety at hospitals. The factors will then be connected to theory of management, theory of leadership and theory of motivation. Beside that a researh is performed toward the continous activities of PSBH at hospitals. Research is performed in Rumah Sakit Pusat Pertamina and Rumah Sakit Dr.Sardjito with 14 informant Research method used is qualitative method that is indepth interview and document study. Data analysis conducted with content analysis method which is comparing the result with bibliography theory. The result of the research shows that PSBH has a structurized and well organized plan which is called Plan of Action. The arrangement of the plan of action is equivalent to the theory of management. The type of leadership influencing the success of PSBH is leadership that gives the freedom to the members of the team to give their opinion and focusing in group discussion. This type of leadership is associated to the democratic type. The motivating factor that influencing the success of PSBH is the responsibility toward patients. The continous activities of PSBH mostly have been sussessfully done by legalisation of the Standard Operating Procedure. The conclusion from this research is the success of PSBH are influenced by the well organized plan of action and supported by the democratic type of leadership from each of problem solver. Beside, the responsibility toward patient also influencing the succes of PSBH. The reason PSBH can be done continously in hospitals is because the advantages of the activities can be feel either by the patient or by the health administrator.
