Iklim keselamatan merupakan persepsi pekerja tentang pentingnya perilaku aman saat bekerja berkaitan dengan kebijakan, keselamatan, prosedur, praktik, serta seluruh kepentingan dan prioritas keselamatan kerja. Iklim keselamatan yang buruk akan ditandai dengan peningkatan stress pekerja, komunikasi keselamatan yang buruk, dan kurangnya dukungan sehingga dapat menormalkan perilaku tidak aman, merusak kesadaran situasional, dan meningkatkan kemungkinan kecelakaan. Pengukuran iklim keselamatan dapat dijadikan perusahaan sebagai leading indicator untuk acuan dalam membuat/memperbaiki program keselamatan yang sudah ada. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis profil safety climate pada area support point di PT X Tahun 2025 berdasarkan dimensi komitmen manajemen, komunikasi keselamatan, aturan dan prosedur, lingkungan yang mendukung, akuntabilitas pribadi, dan pelatihan. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah cross sectional dengan metode pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner (data primer). Jumlah sampel yang dianalisis sebanyak 118 orang. Analisis data digunakan melalui analisis deskriptif dan inferensial (Uji Mann Whitney dan Kruskal Wallis). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa profil safety climate di area support point PT X tahun 2025 sudah baik, dengan rata – rata  nilai 5,18. Seluruh dimensi yang diukur mendapatkan rata – rata skor 4,98 – 5,31. Skor rata – rata safety climate pada kelompok usia, masa kerja, dan pendidikan menunjukkan adanya perbedaan signifikan pada dimensi komitmen manajemen, komunikasi keselamatan, dan pelatihan.

---

Safety climate is a worker's perception of the importance of safe behavior at work in relation towards policies, safety, procedures, practices, and overall safety interests and priorities. A poor safety climate will be characterized by increased worker stress, poor safety communication, and lack of support thus normalizing unsafe behavior, decreasing situational awareness, and increasing the likelihood of accidents. Safety climate measurements can be used by companies as a leading indicator in establishing / improving existing safety programs. This study aims to analyze the safety climate profile in the support point area at PT X in 2025 based on the dimensions of management commitment, safety communication, rules and procedures, supportive environment, personal accountability, and training. The research design used is cross sectional with data collection methods using questionnaires (primary data). The number of samples analyzed was 118 respondents. Data analysis was used through descriptive and inferential analysis (Mann Whitney and Kruskal Wallis Test). The results of this study indicate that the safety climate profile in the PT X support point area in 2025 is good, with an average score of 5.18. All dimensions measured get an average score of 4.98 - 5.31. The average safety climate score in the age, tenure, and education groups showed significant differences in the dimensions of management commitment, safety communication, and training.

Pendahuluan: Sektor konstruksi merupakan salah satu sektor dengan risiko kecelakaan kerja yang tinggi baik secara global maupun nasional. Tingginya angka kecelakaan kerja dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor, termasuk perilaku tidak aman dan kondisi safety climate di tempat kerja. Safety climate mencerminkan persepsi pekerja terhadap komitmen organisasi dalam penerapan keselamatan yang membentuk perilaku keselamatan pekerja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis profil safety climate pada proyek pembangunan apartemen PT X Tahun 2026 serta menganalisis perbedaan tingkat safety climate berdasarkan karakteristik demografi pekerja. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain cross – sectional, metode pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner oleh Lestari et al. (2020). Jumlah sampel sebanyak 74 responden menggunakan teknik stratified random sampling. Analisis data responden dengan analisis univariat (deskriptif) dan bivariat (Uji Kruskal – Wallis). Hasil: Secara umum profil safety climate pada proyek pembangunan apartemen PT X tahun 2026 termasuk kategori baik (5,05 dari 6,00). Dimensi tertinggi adalah komunikasi keselamatan sedangkan dimensi terendah adalah aturan dan prosedur. Terdapat perbedaan signifikan pada tingkat safety climate berdasarkan karakteristik demografi pekerja. Kesimpulan: PT X telah menunjukkan komitmennya melalui pelaksanaan program keselamatan di area proyek Dibutuhkan upaya untuk meningkatkan persepsi pekerja terkait keselamatan kerja khususnya penerapan aturan dan prosedur kerja.

Introduction: The construction sector is one of the sectors with a high risk of workplace accidents, both globally and nationally. The high rate of workplace accidents is influenced by various factors, including unsafe behavior and the safety climate in the workplace. The safety climate reflects workers’ perceptions of the organization’s commitment to safety implementation, which shapes workers’ safety behavior. This study aims to analyze the safety climate profile in PT X’s 2026 apartment construction project and to analyze differences in safety climate levels based on workers’ demographic characteristics. Methods: This study employed a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design; data collection utilized a questionnaire adapted from Lestari et al. (2020). The sample consisted of 74 respondents selected via stratified random sampling. Respondent data were analyzed using univariate (descriptive) and bivariate (Kruskal–Wallis test) analyses. Results: Overall, the safety climate profile for PT X’s 2026 apartment construction project falls into the “good” category (5.05 out of 6.00). The highest-scoring dimension was safety communication, while the lowest-scoring dimension was rules and procedures. There were significant differences in safety climate levels based on workers’ demographic characteristics. Conclusion: PT X has demonstrated its commitment through the implementation of safety programs at the project site. Efforts are needed to improve workers’ perceptions regarding workplace safety, particularly regarding the implementation of work rules and procedures.

Psychological safety  merupakan aspek yang penting dalam menciptakan lingkungan kerja yang sehat dan mendukung partisipasi pekerja. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan psychological safety  pada pekerja di Perusahaan X. Penelitian kuantitatif dengan desain cross-sectional ini melibatkan 234 pekerja yang dipilih menggunakan proportionate random sampling berdasarkan departemen. Variabel independen meliputi faktor individu (jenis kelamin, tingkat pendidikan, internal work locus of control, eksternal work locus of control dan career adaptability), faktor pekerjaan (leader-member exchange, negative workplace gossip, positive workplace gossip, work autonomy , dan role ambiguity), serta faktor organisasi (transformational leadership, hierarchical structure, communication quality, dan organizational orientation). Analisis dilakukan menggunakan regresi linear sederhana. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan rata-rata skor psychological safety sebesar 147,57 ± 17,47 (skala 1-180), dengan dimensi mutual trust/respect memiliki skor rata-rata tertinggi. Faktor individu yang berhubungan signifikan dengan psychological safety adalah internal work locus of control, career adaptability, dan tingkat pendidikan, sedangkan jenis kelamin dan external work locus of control tidak berhubungan signifikan. Pada faktor pekerjaan, leader-member exchange, work autonomy, dan role ambiguity berhubungan signifikan dengan psychological safety, sedangkan negative workplace gossip dan positive workplace gossip tidak berhubungan signifikan. Seluruh faktor organisasi, yaitu transformational leadership, hierarchical structure, communication quality, dan organizational orientation, menunjukkan hubungan positif yang signifikan dengan psychological safety.

Psychological safety is an essential aspect of creating a healthy work environment and encouraging employee participation. This study aimed to examine the factors associated with psychological safety among manufacturing workers at Company X. This quantitative study employed a cross-sectional design involving 234 workers selected using proportionate stratified random sampling based on department. The independent variables included individual factors (gender, educational level, internal work locus of control, external work locus of control, and career adaptability), job-related factors (leader-member exchange, negative workplace gossip, positive workplace gossip, work autonomy, and role ambiguity), and organizational factors (transformational leadership, hierarchical structure, communication quality, and organizational orientation). Data were analyzed using simple linear regression. The results showed that the mean psychological safety score was 147.57 ± 17.47 (range: 1-180), with mutual trust/respect demonstrating the highest mean score among the dimensions. Among the individual factors, internal work locus of control, career adaptability, and educational level were significantly associated with psychological safety, whereas gender and external work locus of control were not. Regarding job-related factors, leader-member exchange, work autonomy, and role ambiguity were significantly associated with psychological safety, while negative workplace gossip and positive workplace gossip showed no significant associations. All organizational factors, namely transformational leadership, hierarchical structure, communication quality, and organizational orientation, were positively and significantly associated with psychological safety.