Ditemukan 31876 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Safety climate is a worker's perception of the importance of safe behavior at work in relation towards policies, safety, procedures, practices, and overall safety interests and priorities. A poor safety climate will be characterized by increased worker stress, poor safety communication, and lack of support thus normalizing unsafe behavior, decreasing situational awareness, and increasing the likelihood of accidents. Safety climate measurements can be used by companies as a leading indicator in establishing / improving existing safety programs. This study aims to analyze the safety climate profile in the support point area at PT X in 2025 based on the dimensions of management commitment, safety communication, rules and procedures, supportive environment, personal accountability, and training. The research design used is cross sectional with data collection methods using questionnaires (primary data). The number of samples analyzed was 118 respondents. Data analysis was used through descriptive and inferential analysis (Mann Whitney and Kruskal Wallis Test). The results of this study indicate that the safety climate profile in the PT X support point area in 2025 is good, with an average score of 5.18. All dimensions measured get an average score of 4.98 - 5.31. The average safety climate score in the age, tenure, and education groups showed significant differences in the dimensions of management commitment, safety communication, and training.
Industri agrokimia menghadapi risiko keselamatan tinggi akibat penggunaan bahan kimia berbahaya dan proses produksi yang kompleks. Safety leadership menjadi krusial dalam menciptakan lingkungan kerja yang aman dan meminimalkan risiko kecelakaan serta dampak negatif terhadap kesehatan pekerja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis profil safety leadership di PT X dan menganalisis implementasinya berdasarkan LEAD Model. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan mixed method, dengan data kuantitatif melalui kuesioner yang diadaptasi dari LEAD Scale dan data kualitatif melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi lapangan, dan tinjauan dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa safety leadership di PT X memiliki karakteristik yang positif dengan dimensi Leverage, Energise, Adapt, dan Defend. Dimensi Leverage menunjukkan skor tertinggi (4,56), menandakan efektivitas pemimpin dalam memanfaatkan sumber daya. Namun, dimensi Defend memiliki skor terendah (4,12), menunjukkan perlunya peningkatan dalam strategi perlindungan dan mitigasi risiko. Subdimensi dengan skor tertinggi adalah Clarity (4,63), sedangkan yang terendah adalah Accountability (4,12). Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa PT X telah berhasil menerapkan safety leadership dengan baik, namun masih ada ruang untuk peningkatan, terutama dalam aspek akuntabilitas. Saran yang diberikan meliputi pengembangan sistem pemantauan yang lebih efektif, mendorong keterlibatan aktif karyawan dalam program keselamatan, dan membangun budaya keselamatan yang proaktif.
The agrochemical industry faces high safety risks due to the use of hazardous chemicals and complex production processes. Safety leadership is crucial in creating a safe work environment and minimizing the risk of accidents and negative impacts on workers' health. This study aims to analyze the safety leadership profile at PT X and evaluate its implementation based on the LEAD Model. The research method employs a mixed- method approach, utilizing quantitative data collected through questionnaires adapted from the LEAD Scale and qualitative data through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document reviews. The study results indicate that safety leadership at PT X exhibits positive characteristics across the dimensions of Leverage, Energise, Adapt, and Defend. The Leverage dimension scored the highest (4.56), indicating the effectiveness of leaders in utilizing resources. However, the Defend dimension scored the lowest (4.12), highlighting the need for improvements in protection strategies and risk mitigation. The subdimension with the highest score is Clarity (4.63), while Accountability scored the lowest (4.12). The conclusion of this study is that PT X has successfully implemented safety leadership, but there is still room for improvement, particularly in accountability aspects. Recommendations include developing a more effective monitoring system, encouraging active employee participation in safety programs, and fostering a proactive safety culture.
