Ditemukan 38672 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query :: Simpan CSV
Paparan terhadap bahan kimia dan faktor fisika di lingkungan kerja manufaktur herbisida berpotensi menimbulkan risiko kesehatan serius jika tidak dilakukan pengendalian secara sistematis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan Health Risk Assessment (HRA) terhadap bahaya kimia dan fisika yang dihadapi oleh pekerja di area produksi, packaging, dan gudang pada industri manufaktur herbisida, dengan pendekatan berbasis Similar Exposure Group (SEG). Metode yang digunakan mengacu pada kerangka kerja ISO 31000:2018 dan praktik rekomendasi HRA dari otoritas internasional. Data diperoleh melalui dokumen pemantauan lingkungan kerja, SDS, OHSERA, dan wawancara dengan pemangku kepentingan. Risiko dinilai menggunakan matriks semi-kuantitatif berdasarkan skor likelihood dan severity, dengan validasi keparahan kesehatan merujuk pada referensi seperti ACGIH dan literatur ilmiah terkini. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa SEG Proses menghadapi risiko tinggi dari paparan Monoisopropylamine (MIPA) dan Kalium Hidroksida (KOH), sedangkan SEG Packaging dan Warehouse memiliki risiko signifikan akibat kebisingan, getaran, panas, serta uap bahan kimia volatil. Evaluasi existing control menunjukkan pengendalian belum optimal dalam menurunkan risiko ke tingkat rendah. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penguatan pengendalian teknis dan administratif, seperti ventilasi lokal, rotasi kerja, penggunaan alat pelindung diri yang sesuai, serta pengaturan waktu kerja-istirahat, diperlukan untuk menurunkan risiko residual. Penilaian risiko berbasis SEG terbukti efektif dalam memetakan prioritas pengendalian dan memberikan dasar yang kuat untuk pengambilan keputusan K3 di industri sejenis.
Exposure to chemical agents and physical hazards in herbicide manufacturing environments poses serious health risks if not managed systematically. This study aims to conduct a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) of chemical and physical hazards encountered by workers in the production, packaging, and warehouse areas of a herbicide manufacturing industry, using a Similar Exposure Group (SEG) approach. The methodology follows the ISO 31000:2018 risk management framework and international best practices for occupational health risk assessment. Data were obtained through environmental monitoring reports, safety data sheets (SDS), OHSERA records, and interviews with relevant stakeholders. Risks were assessed using a semi-quantitative matrix based on likelihood and severity scores, with health severity validation referring to ACGIH and recent peer-reviewed scientific literature. The findings indicate that the Process SEG faces high risks from exposure to Monoisopropylamine (MIPA) and Potassium Hydroxide (KOH), while the Packaging and Warehouse SEGs are significantly affected by noise, vibration, heat, and volatile chemical vapors. Evaluation of existing controls reveals that current measures are not sufficiently effective in reducing risks to acceptable levels. The study concludes that stronger technical and administrative controls—such as local exhaust ventilation, work rotation, appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and regulated work-rest schedules—are essential to achieve low residual risks. Risk assessment based on SEGs has proven effective in mapping control priorities and provides a solid foundation for occupational health and safety decision-making in similar industrial settings.
The manufacturing sector is more likely to face challenges in safety implementation due to its high-risk operational nature. Measuring safety climate is essential to evaluate how well safety efforts are understood and practiced by workers. Safety climate reflects employees’ shared perceptions of safety values, policies, and practices in the workplace. This study aims to assess the safety climate among production workers at PT X, focusing on six dimensions: management commitment, safety communication, safety rules and procedures, supportive environment, personal accountability, and safety training, and to identify areas needing improvement. A quantitative, cross-sectional design was used, employing a self-administered questionnaire adapted from Lestari et al. (2020). Data from 81 respondents were analyzed using mean difference tests. The safety climate was rated as good, with a mean score of 5.14 out of 6.00. No significant differences were found across demographic groups, except for perceived management commitment, which varied by length of service. Findings highlight the importance of genuine management commitment in fostering a strong safety culture. However, improvement is still needed in personal accountability and safety training to enhance overall safety performance at PT X.
This Health Risk Assessment research that was implemented at PT X North Operations Area. The aims of this study was to review the data on personal dose exposure measurement results for 1 measurement period 2015 - 2017 nd conduct a health risk assessment using a semi-quantitative analysis method with reference to the IPIECA & OGP Risk Assessment Matrix Year 2006. The results of this study identified 9 SEGs, but after being studied quantitatively there were SEGs that needed to be classified into several sub-groups and health hazards only referred to secondary documents as many as 10 health hazards. There is a variety of personal dose measurement results in 1 SEG showing one of the weaknesses in the classification of SEG which only refers to job title. The Residual Risk Level in each SEG for all gas hazards (Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene) is at a low risk level, except for H2S which is in the medium risk category. Meanwhile, noise is classified as low risk in SEG GS Operators, MWT Operators, Gas Operators, Welder, Company Representatives and noise is a medium risk in several SEG Technician shops, especially during metalizing work. The H2S risk level cannot be lowered to low considering that the severity level is at a high level (4). Reducing the risk level of noise hazards can be implemented by consistent implementation of HCP and it is necessary to measure the effectiveness of the earmuff / earplugs function to determine the effective dose received by workers. Health risks at the Low Risk level must still be managed so that the risk level does not increase so that PT X continues to implement existing controls and ensure the implementation a comprehensive HRA study by conducting observations / interviews to determine the effectiveness of implementing existing controls on the Potential Risk Level and Residual Risk Level
Industri agrokimia menghadapi risiko keselamatan tinggi akibat penggunaan bahan kimia berbahaya dan proses produksi yang kompleks. Safety leadership menjadi krusial dalam menciptakan lingkungan kerja yang aman dan meminimalkan risiko kecelakaan serta dampak negatif terhadap kesehatan pekerja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis profil safety leadership di PT X dan menganalisis implementasinya berdasarkan LEAD Model. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan mixed method, dengan data kuantitatif melalui kuesioner yang diadaptasi dari LEAD Scale dan data kualitatif melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi lapangan, dan tinjauan dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa safety leadership di PT X memiliki karakteristik yang positif dengan dimensi Leverage, Energise, Adapt, dan Defend. Dimensi Leverage menunjukkan skor tertinggi (4,56), menandakan efektivitas pemimpin dalam memanfaatkan sumber daya. Namun, dimensi Defend memiliki skor terendah (4,12), menunjukkan perlunya peningkatan dalam strategi perlindungan dan mitigasi risiko. Subdimensi dengan skor tertinggi adalah Clarity (4,63), sedangkan yang terendah adalah Accountability (4,12). Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa PT X telah berhasil menerapkan safety leadership dengan baik, namun masih ada ruang untuk peningkatan, terutama dalam aspek akuntabilitas. Saran yang diberikan meliputi pengembangan sistem pemantauan yang lebih efektif, mendorong keterlibatan aktif karyawan dalam program keselamatan, dan membangun budaya keselamatan yang proaktif.
The agrochemical industry faces high safety risks due to the use of hazardous chemicals and complex production processes. Safety leadership is crucial in creating a safe work environment and minimizing the risk of accidents and negative impacts on workers' health. This study aims to analyze the safety leadership profile at PT X and evaluate its implementation based on the LEAD Model. The research method employs a mixed- method approach, utilizing quantitative data collected through questionnaires adapted from the LEAD Scale and qualitative data through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document reviews. The study results indicate that safety leadership at PT X exhibits positive characteristics across the dimensions of Leverage, Energise, Adapt, and Defend. The Leverage dimension scored the highest (4.56), indicating the effectiveness of leaders in utilizing resources. However, the Defend dimension scored the lowest (4.12), highlighting the need for improvements in protection strategies and risk mitigation. The subdimension with the highest score is Clarity (4.63), while Accountability scored the lowest (4.12). The conclusion of this study is that PT X has successfully implemented safety leadership, but there is still room for improvement, particularly in accountability aspects. Recommendations include developing a more effective monitoring system, encouraging active employee participation in safety programs, and fostering a proactive safety culture.
Working processess at Hydro Cracking Complex HCC have chemical dan physical hazards for the workers. This study asssessed about health risk hazard and Health Risk Assessment HRA by using semiquantitative method to determine score, exposure, consequence, and likelihood, then we rsquo ll calculate them into Risk Assessment Matriks RAM . The guideline that we use is from International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association IPIECA and the International Association of Oil Gas Producers OGP.
The chemical manufacturing industry is one of the industrial sectors with high hazard potential and complex work processes, requiring the implementation of a strong occupational safety system. One critical aspect that must be explored in depth is the level of safety culture maturity within a company. This study aims to analyze the maturity level of safety culture at PT. XYZ and identify the differences in perception and engagement among employees. The assessment was conducted using a questionnaire instrument consisting of various safety culture dimensions and elements, supported by data from interviews, focus group discussions, and document reviews. Based on the analysis results, the overall safety culture maturity level at PT. XYZ was found to be at level 3 or Calculative. This indicates that while the company has a structured and well-documented safety management system, safety values have not yet been fully internalized into daily work behaviors. In addition, the study found significant differences in perceptions across job levels and departments, where workers in operational roles had limited involvement in safety evaluation and organizational learning. Areas that require improvement include safety communication effectiveness, employee participation in incident analysis, and consistency in follow-up actions from findings and risk evaluations.